|
| Re: connections leading to nowhere [message #119320 is a reply to message #119240] |
Tue, 24 February 2004 13:49   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: none.us.ibm.com
This is what the logic example does, and we borrowed this "laziness" from
VA-Java's composition editor.
If your application really has connections which go across or are within
containers, there are ways of handling this for your specific editor.
"Ingo Koch" <nospam@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:c1fr1l$gk4$1@eclipse.org...
> Hello Group,
>
> I have 2 nodes, connected with a wire.
> One of these nodes is within a container.
> When i downsize the container that way, that the the node within
> gets out of the bounds of the container, the node disappears. - thats ok.
> But the connection leads into nowhere, exactly there where the node is
> supposed to be...
>
> I know of the seperate connection layer and that this topic is sure
> problematic,
> but is there a way or are there plans to avoid this - i mean, that the
> connection leads "into" the container and ends at the containers bounds?
>
> I
|
|
|
| Re: connections leading to nowhere [message #119574 is a reply to message #119320] |
Thu, 26 February 2004 09:28 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: nospam.gmx.net
> If your application really has connections which go across or are within
> containers, there are ways of handling this for your specific editor.
Well, the screenshot was from the logic editor and my application
behaves the same way.
What would you suggest to do to handle this problem?
Regards, Ingo
>
> "Ingo Koch" <nospam@gmx.net> wrote in message
> news:c1fr1l$gk4$1@eclipse.org...
> > Hello Group,
> >
> > I have 2 nodes, connected with a wire.
> > One of these nodes is within a container.
> > When i downsize the container that way, that the the node within
> > gets out of the bounds of the container, the node disappears. - thats
ok.
> > But the connection leads into nowhere, exactly there where the node is
> > supposed to be...
> >
> > I know of the seperate connection layer and that this topic is sure
> > problematic,
> > but is there a way or are there plans to avoid this - i mean, that the
> > connection leads "into" the container and ends at the containers bounds?
> >
> > I
|
|
|
| Re: connections leading to nowhere [message #119598 is a reply to message #119574] |
Thu, 26 February 2004 09:45 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: none.us.ibm.com
I have no idea what the user would expect in this situation. Some clients
are clipping the anchor to the node's parent.
"Ingo Koch" <nospam@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:c1kvjh$26v$1@eclipse.org...
>
> > If your application really has connections which go across or are within
> > containers, there are ways of handling this for your specific editor.
>
> Well, the screenshot was from the logic editor and my application
> behaves the same way.
> What would you suggest to do to handle this problem?
>
> Regards, Ingo
>
>
>
>
> >
> > "Ingo Koch" <nospam@gmx.net> wrote in message
> > news:c1fr1l$gk4$1@eclipse.org...
> > > Hello Group,
> > >
> > > I have 2 nodes, connected with a wire.
> > > One of these nodes is within a container.
> > > When i downsize the container that way, that the the node within
> > > gets out of the bounds of the container, the node disappears. - thats
> ok.
> > > But the connection leads into nowhere, exactly there where the node is
> > > supposed to be...
> > >
> > > I know of the seperate connection layer and that this topic is sure
> > > problematic,
> > > but is there a way or are there plans to avoid this - i mean, that the
> > > connection leads "into" the container and ends at the containers
bounds?
> > >
> > > I
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03394 seconds
Home