| org.eclipse.wst.sse.core.documentTypes extension point [message #112991] |
Tue, 21 June 2005 11:59  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Looking at the XML catalog contributions in
org.eclipse.wst.html.standard.dtds, I see other contributions like those
below. But there is no exsd schema for this in the SSE source. How are
these contributions used? Are there other variations of this extension
point for XML document types other than XHTML?
<extension point="org.eclipse.wst.sse.core.documentTypes">
<documentType elementName="html" displayName="XHTML 1.0 Strict"
namespaceURI="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" isXHTML="true"
hasFrameset="false" publicID="-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
systemID="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
</documentType>
Thanks!
Dave Carlson
|
|
|
| Re: org.eclipse.wst.sse.core.documentTypes extension point [message #113348 is a reply to message #112991] |
Thu, 23 June 2005 12:29  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:59:12 -0400, Dave Carlson <dcarlson@xmlmodeling.com> wrote:
> How are
> these contributions used? Are there other variations of this extension
> point for XML document types other than XHTML?
"If you build it they will come", eh?
This extension point is not currently used too much, though there's an
historic hint at mapping a public ID to a specific systemID,
as well as allowing more "dynamic" addition of new doctype's by
add-on providers, where certain characteristics could be "soft coded"
(e.g. "isXHTML"). Current code is mix of soft and hard coding, which we
hope to clean up post .7, pre 1.0 ... as well as assess this extension point,
and document if useful.
Have problem you're trying to solve?
There's some interesting "enxtended resolution" feature requests open.
(usually with XML Catalog or Content Model in the summary).
|
|
|
| Re: org.eclipse.wst.sse.core.documentTypes extension point [message #113475 is a reply to message #113348] |
Thu, 23 June 2005 20:17 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Thanks, David. I am setting up some XML catalogs for standard e-commerce
schemas and was using the XHTML entries for examples of the extension
points. Didn't know if these documentTypes extensions would be helpful or
relevant.
I will look through the related Bugzilla requests.
Thanx,
Dave Carlson
"David Williams" <david_williams@us.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:op.sstz29s1ac05ss@news.eclipse.org...
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:59:12 -0400, Dave Carlson
> <dcarlson@xmlmodeling.com> wrote:
>
>> How are
>> these contributions used? Are there other variations of this extension
>> point for XML document types other than XHTML?
>
>
> "If you build it they will come", eh?
> This extension point is not currently used too much, though there's an
> historic hint at mapping a public ID to a specific systemID,
> as well as allowing more "dynamic" addition of new doctype's by
> add-on providers, where certain characteristics could be "soft coded"
> (e.g. "isXHTML"). Current code is mix of soft and hard coding, which we
> hope to clean up post .7, pre 1.0 ... as well as assess this extension
> point,
> and document if useful.
>
> Have problem you're trying to solve?
> There's some interesting "enxtended resolution" feature requests open.
> (usually with XML Catalog or Content Model in the summary).
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04489 seconds
Home