Eclipse Community Forums: M2M (model-to-model transformation) » [QVTO] Resolve on disjunctive mapping

Home » Archived » M2M (model-to-model transformation) » [QVTO] Resolve on disjunctive mapping

[QVTO] Resolve on disjunctive mapping [message #854691]

Tue, 24 April 2012 02:50

Eclipse User

I am trying to apply the resolveIn operation to a mapping that uses the disjuncts keyword. The result is always null. When I apply the resolve directly to the mappings that the original one delegates to, everything works fine.

Is there a specific reason that the trace does not support disjunctive mappings?

Re: [QVTO] Resolve on disjunctive mapping [message #855096 is a reply to message #854691]

Tue, 24 April 2012 10:14

Eclipse User

Hi

Pending a more informed reply...

I find the various resolve operators slightly hard to understand and the
interactions of disjuncts and inherits sometimes surprising. No doubt
many of the problems are due to my poor understanding, but I suspect
there are some areas where an imperfect QVTo implementation (or
specification) aggravates misunderstanding. The vagueness of the
specification may require you to do some empirical discovery to
determine which of the available constructs work reliably and in accord
with your evolved understanding.

HTH

Regards

Ed Willink

On 24/04/2012 07:50, Missing name Mising name wrote:
> I am trying to apply the resolveIn operation to a mapping that uses
> the disjuncts keyword. The result is always null. When I apply the
> resolve directly to the mappings that the original one delegates to,
> everything works fine.
>
> Is there a specific reason that the trace does not support disjunctive
> mappings?

Re: [QVTO] Resolve on disjunctive mapping [message #857300 is a reply to message #855096]

Thu, 26 April 2012 08:36

Eclipse User

I see that the specification is not very precise. But in this case, i think it would not hurt to change the implementation towards support for resolving on disjunctive mappings, since currently the result is always null. I think no one actually relies on this null result for his existing transformations. In addition, it does not sound too hard to implement, since the information about mapped objects only has to be propagated such that it is available for the disjunctive mapping. Bugzilla?

[Updated on: Thu, 26 April 2012 08:39] by Moderator

Re: [QVTO] Resolve on disjunctive mapping [message #857312 is a reply to message #857300]

Thu, 26 April 2012 08:50

Eclipse User

Hi

The Eclipse implementations endeavour to follow the specification, so if
you think the specification needs enhancement
http://www.omg.org/report_issue.htm is the appropriate channel.

Regards

Ed Willink

On 26/04/2012 13:36, Missing name Mising name wrote:
> I see that the specification is not very precise. But in this case, i
> think it would not hurt to change the implementation towards support
> for resolving on disjunctive mappings, since currently the result is
> always null. I think no one actually relies on this null result for
> his existing transformations. In addition, it does not sound too hard
> to implement, since the information about mapped objects only has to
> be propagated such that it is available for the disjunctive mapping.
> Bugzilla?

Previous Topic:	[qvto]how to run qvto stand-along
Next Topic:	[QVTO] Cloning intermediate class objects

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Mon Apr 21 11:39:41 EDT 2025

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Breadcrumbs

Sign up to our Newsletter