VE installation failed [message #107856] |
Fri, 23 September 2005 12:09 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: biti509.163.com
i've ever installed ve into eclipse3.0 successfully.
now i try to install ve into eclipse3.1 in the same way, but faile.
i've installed the plug-in: Eclipse build 3.1, EMF build 2.1.0 and GEF
Build 3.1.
EMF and GEF are available and can be seen in eclipse.
But ve cannot be seen in eclipse.
dose anyone meet with the same problem?
|
|
|
Re: VE installation failed [message #107908 is a reply to message #107856] |
Fri, 23 September 2005 15:38 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: richkulp.us.NO_SPAM.ibm.com
You need Eclipse 3.1 SDK, not Eclsipe 3.1 runtime. And using the udpate
manager scan for new features you should see VE 1.1.0 available. You
should install that and then scan for updates again and now VE 1.1.0.1
will be available.
exquisitus wrote:
> i've ever installed ve into eclipse3.0 successfully.
> now i try to install ve into eclipse3.1 in the same way, but faile.
> i've installed the plug-in: Eclipse build 3.1, EMF build 2.1.0 and GEF
> Build 3.1. EMF and GEF are available and can be seen in eclipse.
> But ve cannot be seen in eclipse.
>
> dose anyone meet with the same problem?
>
>
--
Thanks,
Rich Kulp
|
|
|
|
Re: VE installation failed [message #610853 is a reply to message #107856] |
Fri, 23 September 2005 15:38 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: richkulp.us.NO_SPAM.ibm.com
You need Eclipse 3.1 SDK, not Eclsipe 3.1 runtime. And using the udpate
manager scan for new features you should see VE 1.1.0 available. You
should install that and then scan for updates again and now VE 1.1.0.1
will be available.
exquisitus wrote:
> i've ever installed ve into eclipse3.0 successfully.
> now i try to install ve into eclipse3.1 in the same way, but faile.
> i've installed the plug-in: Eclipse build 3.1, EMF build 2.1.0 and GEF
> Build 3.1. EMF and GEF are available and can be seen in eclipse.
> But ve cannot be seen in eclipse.
>
> dose anyone meet with the same problem?
>
>
--
Thanks,
Rich Kulp
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03545 seconds