Home » Language IDEs » PHP Development Tools (PDT) » Preview for PDT 2.1 and request for sanity
| | | | | | |
| Re: Preview for PDT 2.1 and request for sanity [message #98874 is a reply to message #98739] |
Mon, 22 June 2009 08:13   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Roy,
I've been using the RC4 and then the RC5 builds, and they're both great,
and in some ways, even better than Fedora's built-in Eclipse + PDT
download (i.e., the AIO builds are better).
However, there are some problems when working with larger projects. For
example, I do some development using Moodle, which is a very large PHP
project, and just now I got a workbench error while it was trying to
build or whatever it does when processing the enormous amount of files.
Additionally, this was a problem in RC4, and I believe persists in RC5 -
basically, in the same large projects, features like mark occurrences
and type suggest take an enormously long amount of time. When I start
to type a variable, as much as one minute may pass before it lets me
complete typing. That is, when I type "$", what I type after does not
appear for about one minute (usually the first time when loading a
project for the day). Subsequent attempts are slightly faster, but
still on the order of seconds. This was not such a severe problem in
the 1.0.x series. I have disabled almost all of these helpful features
to make the performance of PDT reasonably acceptable.
Aside from that, 2.1 is definitely an improvement over 2.0, but these
issues continue to hassle me and tend to drive me back to phpeclipse,
which is already packaged with Fedora.
Incidentally, the packager for phpeclipse showed some interest in
packaging PDT for Fedora, so I hope the PDT team can coordinate with him
and maybe get PDT into Fedora. That would really be a wonderful turn out.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAko/dVcACgkQaVgOCFr0s2IK3wCfbOQ7eBxoXlKWWc9ujzC5 pcmq
gzkAoJpfb2/bS17VNQH35pSRi14y8zT9
=S6Ia
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
| Re: Preview for PDT 2.1 and request for sanity [message #98889 is a reply to message #98874] |
Mon, 22 June 2009 15:50 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Thank you all for the feedback, I really appreciate it!
Can you please open issue in Bugzilla about your request:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=PDT
- Roy
Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Roy,
> I've been using the RC4 and then the RC5 builds, and they're both great,
> and in some ways, even better than Fedora's built-in Eclipse + PDT
> download (i.e., the AIO builds are better).
> However, there are some problems when working with larger projects. For
> example, I do some development using Moodle, which is a very large PHP
> project, and just now I got a workbench error while it was trying to
> build or whatever it does when processing the enormous amount of files.
> Additionally, this was a problem in RC4, and I believe persists in RC5 -
> basically, in the same large projects, features like mark occurrences
> and type suggest take an enormously long amount of time. When I start
> to type a variable, as much as one minute may pass before it lets me
> complete typing. That is, when I type "$", what I type after does not
> appear for about one minute (usually the first time when loading a
> project for the day). Subsequent attempts are slightly faster, but
> still on the order of seconds. This was not such a severe problem in
> the 1.0.x series. I have disabled almost all of these helpful features
> to make the performance of PDT reasonably acceptable.
> Aside from that, 2.1 is definitely an improvement over 2.0, but these
> issues continue to hassle me and tend to drive me back to phpeclipse,
> which is already packaged with Fedora.
> Incidentally, the packager for phpeclipse showed some interest in
> packaging PDT for Fedora, so I hope the PDT team can coordinate with him
> and maybe get PDT into Fedora. That would really be a wonderful turn out.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> iEYEARECAAYFAko/dVcACgkQaVgOCFr0s2IK3wCfbOQ7eBxoXlKWWc9ujzC5 pcmq
> gzkAoJpfb2/bS17VNQH35pSRi14y8zT9
> =S6Ia
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Tישמל
טםו עוטד
|
|
| | |
| Re: Preview for PDT 2.1 and request for sanity [message #98932 is a reply to message #98904] |
Tue, 23 June 2009 17:11 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Basil Mohamed Gohar napsal(a):
>
> By the way, are ALL Bugzilla instances slow? At first I thought it was
> just Red Hat's, but it seems that's just par for the course. Any tips
> on what I can do to make it work faster for me, or do we just have to
> live with it?
Hi Basil,
eclipse's BugZilla is really very very slow and when i'm using this bugzilla, web browser
is freezing and web browser doesn't respond in many situations.
I want to tell, that this is very very annoying and I couldn't understand, why peoples,
which are responsible don't do something with this problem.
Many times I wanted create new ticket in eclipse's bugzilla, but because it's so very slow
i didn't
Peoples from eclipse dev team know about this problem for 100%, but the problem is
somewhere in other place and isn't so simple to speed up this.
But know about some thing or situation, when this problem doesn't occur.
Solution is MYLYN!!. I recommend to you, start using MYLYN and you will not problem with
slow bugzilla web app ;) ;) ;)
I hope this help
|
|
| | | |
| Re: Preview for PDT 2.1 and request for sanity [message #99734 is a reply to message #98739] |
Tue, 07 July 2009 12:04 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
I am using Mac OS X 10.5.7. I tried PDT 2.1 on a MacBook Pro (32 bit) and
on a Mac Pro (64 Bit). I can't set up the PHP Executable path as when
hitting the Browse button the dialog box doesn't show hidden files. This
works fine in PDT 2.0. If I type in the path directly, e.g.
usr/local/php5/bin (path tp Entropy PHP) I get various errors when I try
to run a test script.
Has anybody else seen this?
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Jul 12 10:59:21 EDT 2025
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.34403 seconds |
Home