(cdt8.1 + cygwin)Invalid project path: Include path not found (\cygdrive\f\.....) [message #812600] |
Sun, 04 March 2012 02:46 |
Todd Leftart Messages: 3 Registered: January 2012 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Seems this is an old problem.
I created a C++ executable project with toolchain "Cygwin GCC".
Then in the Project Properties, C/C++ Build / Settings, Cygwin C++ Compiler / Includes, I added a new include path "/cygdrive/f/xxxx/include".
The project was build successfully, and the indexer works fine, too. I think CDT knows that "/cygdrive/f/" is "F:\" very well.
But the IDE gives out a waring "Invalid project path: Include path not found (\cygdrive\f\xxxx\include).", and in the Project Explorer, the "\cygdrive\f\xxxx\include" entry under "Includes" are gray and not-expandable.
not a very big problem, just curious, is that a problem of my settings or a bug of CDT?
|
|
|
Re: (cdt8.1 + cygwin)Invalid project path: Include path not found (\cygdrive\f\.....) [message #814800 is a reply to message #812600] |
Tue, 06 March 2012 22:45 |
AK Mising name Messages: 10 Registered: August 2011 |
Junior Member |
|
|
It's one of those bugs which came with the worst eclipse version ever: Indigo. My proposal is to go back to CDT 7 which means: use Helios.
More detail:
Include paths are detected by Eclipse itself. The user can not change these includes except if you delete the *.sc files in your workspace. Maybe this could help:
www.eclipse.org / forums / index.php/mv/msg/171339/788114/#msg_788114
<EDIT> I am unable to post links because I have not reached 25 board messages. It is very easy to circumvent such policy. Which idiot implements such scoring algorithms instead of fixing one of those uncountable Eclipse CDT bugs?</EDIT>.
BTW: The Indigo release is a horrible mess. I detected a lot Show Stoppers and not even one is fixed in the latest SR2. One example which heads in the same direction is http : // bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=353719.
[Updated on: Tue, 06 March 2012 22:51] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03029 seconds