| Eclipse Galileo and PDT 2.1 - stability [message #98122] |
Fri, 05 June 2009 10:08  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
i'm using ganymede and pdt 2.0.1 now and I want to ask you how it's with stability in last
PDT 2.1 builds ?
Are there any exceptions, lost of data or somewhat what should impede in development ?
Somebody who have any experiences with newset builds, share yours experience about this
problematic.
Are this newset build ready for production development ?
Thank you very much for your advices and suggestions
|
|
|
|
| Re: Eclipse Galileo and PDT 2.1 - stability [message #98227 is a reply to message #98197] |
Mon, 08 June 2009 15:45  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Rik napsal(a):
> I am using the last All In One version. I don't notice any problem over the
> previous version.
> I'm very happy of PDT. The only true lack is in javascript language
> validator: good, but far away from real use anche compatibility with
> existent software. You can see that loading jQuery etc.: Tons of warnings
> and errors... that really are not. But this is the same in previous version,
> so nothing worse.
> About PHP I am fully happy od PDT. I've also tried Netbeans but, despite
> it's gorgeus friendly installation/use, is a little bit less advanced.
> Eclipse Galileo and PDT 2.1 PHP vote: 9/10 :)
>
>
Hi Rik,
many thanks for your response, only one question. How long do you using Galileo with PDT 2.1.
And really any null point exception or something similar ?
Warnings in JS files aren't problem for me, because i'm using Aptana plugin, which have
cosmic/magic support for JS and for all JS libs too (for me are very important jQuery,
mootools and DOJO and when MODx 0.9.7 will be out ExtJS support will be very important for
me as well)
Thank you for reaction
|
|
|
| Re: Eclipse Galileo and PDT 2.1 - stability [message #98242 is a reply to message #98227] |
Tue, 09 June 2009 02:28 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: nomail.nomail.it
Hi sNop,
sorry, delete what I said... too much developing is confusing/burning my
brain! :)
Actually I'm working with the stable version Ganymede. I have Galileo only
at home, so I can't say how stable or problematic is. My vote should be
referred to the latest stable version, not Galileo.
OK for Aptana plugin. I tested it with stand alone version of Aptana and
only for javascript is good (not for PHP because too simplistic). I'll never
try to join Aptana plugin with PDT... any danger?
"sNop" <snop3@seznam.cz> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:h0jpp4$sod$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Rik napsal(a):
>> I am using the last All In One version. I don't notice any problem over
>> the
>> previous version.
>> I'm very happy of PDT. The only true lack is in javascript language
>> validator: good, but far away from real use anche compatibility with
>> existent software. You can see that loading jQuery etc.: Tons of warnings
>> and errors... that really are not. But this is the same in previous
>> version,
>> so nothing worse.
>> About PHP I am fully happy od PDT. I've also tried Netbeans but, despite
>> it's gorgeus friendly installation/use, is a little bit less advanced.
>> Eclipse Galileo and PDT 2.1 PHP vote: 9/10 :)
>>
>>
>
> Hi Rik,
>
> many thanks for your response, only one question. How long do you using
> Galileo with PDT 2.1.
>
> And really any null point exception or something similar ?
>
> Warnings in JS files aren't problem for me, because i'm using Aptana
> plugin, which have
> cosmic/magic support for JS and for all JS libs too (for me are very
> important jQuery,
> mootools and DOJO and when MODx 0.9.7 will be out ExtJS support will be
> very important for
> me as well)
>
> Thank you for reaction
|
|
|
| Re: Eclipse Galileo and PDT 2.1 - stability [message #98301 is a reply to message #98242] |
Tue, 09 June 2009 06:43 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Rik napsal(a):
> Hi sNop,
> sorry, delete what I said... too much developing is confusing/burning my
> brain! :)
> Actually I'm working with the stable version Ganymede. I have Galileo only
> at home, so I can't say how stable or problematic is. My vote should be
> referred to the latest stable version, not Galileo.
>
> OK for Aptana plugin. I tested it with stand alone version of Aptana and
> only for javascript is good (not for PHP because too simplistic). I'll never
> try to join Aptana plugin with PDT... any danger?
>
>
>
Hi Rik,
I very recommand to you join Aptana with PDT, there aren't any problems and Aptana fully
support Eclipse 3.4 now.
I'm using Aptana with PDT min. 2 years, I'm using Aptana JS plugin for editing JS files
(WTP have cleaner program code, Aptana haven't, but Aptana functionality abality is about
80% more than WTP) ;)
And i'm using Aptana html editor for editing html files and aptana css for css files.
And XML files are supported too.
Nothing better than Aptana for web development doesn't exist ;)
You can very detaily set up every element of the formating, tabbing, ...:
http://yfrog.com/8drik1p
|
|
|
| Re: Eclipse Galileo and PDT 2.1 - stability [message #98316 is a reply to message #98301] |
Tue, 09 June 2009 10:35 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: nomail.nomail.it
I'm sure Aptana manages html/js/css very better than PDT package because
I've tested it as a standalone product and is very evident from the first 2
seconds.
Let's see your jpg...... great!
Is it possibile to modify "PDT all in one" package or is needed to start
from Eclipse clean installation adding PDT and Aptana plugins?
If you have some special advice and/or links let me know.
Many thanks.
"sNop" <snop3@seznam.cz> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:h0lech$kvl$1@build.eclipse.org...
> Rik napsal(a):
>> Hi sNop,
>> sorry, delete what I said... too much developing is confusing/burning my
>> brain! :)
>> Actually I'm working with the stable version Ganymede. I have Galileo
>> only
>> at home, so I can't say how stable or problematic is. My vote should be
>> referred to the latest stable version, not Galileo.
>>
>> OK for Aptana plugin. I tested it with stand alone version of Aptana and
>> only for javascript is good (not for PHP because too simplistic). I'll
>> never
>> try to join Aptana plugin with PDT... any danger?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Hi Rik,
>
> I very recommand to you join Aptana with PDT, there aren't any problems
> and Aptana fully
> support Eclipse 3.4 now.
>
> I'm using Aptana with PDT min. 2 years, I'm using Aptana JS plugin for
> editing JS files
> (WTP have cleaner program code, Aptana haven't, but Aptana functionality
> abality is about
> 80% more than WTP) ;)
>
> And i'm using Aptana html editor for editing html files and aptana css for
> css files.
> And XML files are supported too.
>
> Nothing better than Aptana for web development doesn't exist ;)
>
> You can very detaily set up every element of the formating, tabbing, ...:
> http://yfrog.com/8drik1p
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Eclipse Galileo and PDT 2.1 - stability [message #98449 is a reply to message #98375] |
Thu, 11 June 2009 14:32 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Rik napsal(a):
> I've just tried to install on the fly. After the restart it says that
> org.eclipse.jdt.core must be updated.
> Done.
> Now I have Aptana installed but I don't see nothing different from before,
> nor I see Aptana in preferences as you shown in your jpg.
> I'll try it another time with more time. :-)
>
>
I hasn't any problem with installation anytime, bu this is OT, Aptana problems should be
posted here:
http://forums.aptana.com/
or on the aptana's IRC #aptana
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03714 seconds
Home