|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: New Use Case documents added to Wiki [message #562915 is a reply to message #8774] |
Mon, 28 November 2005 13:33  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: steven.t.novakovich.nokia.com
Minna Bloigu wrote:
> To begin the week with interesting discussions, there are new use cases
> added to Wiki for commenting:
>
> - Build the project (priority 1, modified from an earlier post in this
> newsgroup)
> http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-build-project
>
> - Edit source code (priority 1)
> http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-edit-source-code
>
> - Create a new class (priority 2, updated to wiki from an earlier post in
> this newsgroup
> http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-create-class
>
> - Sign the application (priority 2)
> http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-sign-application
>
> These use cases do not currently have a responsible owner, so we will update
> them according to discussions before an owner is agreed. If you would like
> to provide more input to these use cases or become an owner, please inform
> us. All comments are welcomed.
>
> Rgds,
> Minna
>
>
Hi Minna,
Thanks for the additions to the Wiki.
I am interested in working on the "Edit source code" part.
Can you please list everything that a "use case owner" is expected to do?
I may not have enough "free time" to be a use case owner.
:Steven in Dallas
|
|
|
| Re: New Use Case documents added to Wiki [message #562942 is a reply to message #8810] |
Tue, 29 November 2005 01:45 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Good to hear from you Steve,
and it is nice to notice that there is interest to these subjects.
We have added a proposal of the requirements process and the use cases to
wiki. You can take a look at http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-process and
comment the proposal as well if you like.
In the process proposal we suggest that after a use case is approved to be
in a scope of MTJ, the owner of the use case is responsible of describing
the use case in a more detailed level. The use case can be reviewed again
after the use case is sufficiently outlined and the feature functionality
described. If the use case is approved to be specified enough, the described
feature can be implemented based on the use case contents.
The owner of the use case in the implementation phase does not have to be
the same as the one defining the use case contents and feature
functionality. The proposed MTJ requirements process diagram in the wiki
describes the different steps and phases for a use case perhaps little
better.
Rgds,
Minna
>
> Hi Minna,
>
> Thanks for the additions to the Wiki.
> I am interested in working on the "Edit source code" part.
>
> Can you please list everything that a "use case owner" is expected to do?
>
> I may not have enough "free time" to be a use case owner.
>
> :Steven in Dallas
|
|
|
| Re: New Use Case documents added to Wiki [message #563019 is a reply to message #8817] |
Thu, 01 December 2005 12:13 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: steven.t.novakovich.nokia.com
Minna Bloigu wrote:
> Good to hear from you Steve,
> and it is nice to notice that there is interest to these subjects.
>
> We have added a proposal of the requirements process and the use cases to
> wiki. You can take a look at http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-process and
> comment the proposal as well if you like.
>
> In the process proposal we suggest that after a use case is approved to be
> in a scope of MTJ, the owner of the use case is responsible of describing
> the use case in a more detailed level. The use case can be reviewed again
> after the use case is sufficiently outlined and the feature functionality
> described. If the use case is approved to be specified enough, the described
> feature can be implemented based on the use case contents.
>
> The owner of the use case in the implementation phase does not have to be
> the same as the one defining the use case contents and feature
> functionality. The proposed MTJ requirements process diagram in the wiki
> describes the different steps and phases for a use case perhaps little
> better.
>
> Rgds,
> Minna
>
>
>>Hi Minna,
>>
>>Thanks for the additions to the Wiki.
>>I am interested in working on the "Edit source code" part.
>>
>>Can you please list everything that a "use case owner" is expected to do?
>>
>>I may not have enough "free time" to be a use case owner.
>>
>>:Steven in Dallas
>
>
>
>
Hi Minna,
Thanks for the clarifications and the link to updates.
I'll check everything out and get back to you in this "chain" of posts.
:Steven
|
|
|
| Re: New Use Case documents added to Wiki [message #563099 is a reply to message #8817] |
Fri, 02 December 2005 16:11 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: steven.t.novakovich.nokia.com
Minna Bloigu wrote:
> Good to hear from you Steve,
> and it is nice to notice that there is interest to these subjects.
>
> We have added a proposal of the requirements process and the use cases to
> wiki. You can take a look at http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-process and
> comment the proposal as well if you like.
>
> In the process proposal we suggest that after a use case is approved to be
> in a scope of MTJ, the owner of the use case is responsible of describing
> the use case in a more detailed level. The use case can be reviewed again
> after the use case is sufficiently outlined and the feature functionality
> described. If the use case is approved to be specified enough, the described
> feature can be implemented based on the use case contents.
>
> The owner of the use case in the implementation phase does not have to be
> the same as the one defining the use case contents and feature
> functionality. The proposed MTJ requirements process diagram in the wiki
> describes the different steps and phases for a use case perhaps little
> better.
>
> Rgds,
> Minna
>
>
>>Hi Minna,
>>
>>Thanks for the additions to the Wiki.
>>I am interested in working on the "Edit source code" part.
>>
>>Can you please list everything that a "use case owner" is expected to do?
>>
>>I may not have enough "free time" to be a use case owner.
>>
>>:Steven in Dallas
>
>
>
>
Moi Minna,
I can be the "owner" of the "Edit source code" part.
I will think about things related to the use case you've put together so
far and make some additional proposals next week.
:Steven in Dallas
|
|
|
| Manage runtime updated [message #563149 is a reply to message #8774] |
Thu, 08 December 2005 08:09 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi all,
a new version of the manage runtime use case is now added to Wiki for
community review. The name of the use case is changed to Manage SDK in order
to reflect more the idea of the contents in the document.
The Manage SDK use case is on its own page and editable, but the limitations
with the characters that the eclipse Wiki allows might require that we have
to split
it to several pages. If you can't edit the page, you can send your comments
to this newsgroup or via email.
Manage runtime documents are located in:
MTJ > MTJ Use Cases > Manage runtime
http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-manage-runtime
or you can access directly the latest addition Manage SDK in:
MTJ > MTJ Use Cases > Manage runtime > Manage SDK
http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/MTJ-manage-SDK
Rgds,
Minna
|
|
|
| Re: Manage runtime updated [message #563206 is a reply to message #10888] |
Mon, 12 December 2005 02:06 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Following the proposed MTJ Use Case process, the Manage SDK Use Case is now
in Community Review until 18.12.05. During this time you can give your
comments and change requests to the use case. We hope to get the PMC
approval to start the implementation of this Use Case in the beginning of
next week.
Rgds,
Minna
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05346 seconds
Home