Skip to main content



      Home
Home » Language IDEs » C / C++ IDE (CDT) » executable file size different from one built in command line. Why?
executable file size different from one built in command line. Why? [message #91640] Wed, 14 January 2004 03:40 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Dear all,

Does anybody know why the size of executable files which are built in
different among CDT versions with same Makefile? Have used CDT
1.1/1.2(standard), and noticed the size of executable files are different
little bit. Also, size of executable files are different from file made in
comman line with Linux (same Makefile)

Does anybody have clue?
Thanks,
Ho.
Re: executable file size different from one built in command line. Why? [message #91655 is a reply to message #91640] Wed, 14 January 2004 04:49 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
One thing though,
I have imported existing source tree into CDT and compile. Language is C.
I noticed that if there is empty directories, then they are not imported
into CDT. Why is this happing? Any thought?

Thanks in advance,
Ho.


"Ho An" <ho.an@samsung.com> wrote in message
news:bu2v41$na7$1@eclipse.org...
> Dear all,
>
> Does anybody know why the size of executable files which are built in
> different among CDT versions with same Makefile? Have used CDT
> 1.1/1.2(standard), and noticed the size of executable files are different
> little bit. Also, size of executable files are different from file made
in
> comman line with Linux (same Makefile)
>
> Does anybody have clue?
> Thanks,
> Ho.
>
>
Previous Topic:EclipseCon - Tutorials
Next Topic:Roadmap to large-scale real-time development
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Jul 24 21:12:38 EDT 2025

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05109 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top