| executable file size different from one built in command line. Why? [message #91640] |
Wed, 14 January 2004 03:40  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Dear all,
Does anybody know why the size of executable files which are built in
different among CDT versions with same Makefile? Have used CDT
1.1/1.2(standard), and noticed the size of executable files are different
little bit. Also, size of executable files are different from file made in
comman line with Linux (same Makefile)
Does anybody have clue?
Thanks,
Ho.
|
|
|
| Re: executable file size different from one built in command line. Why? [message #91655 is a reply to message #91640] |
Wed, 14 January 2004 04:49  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
One thing though,
I have imported existing source tree into CDT and compile. Language is C.
I noticed that if there is empty directories, then they are not imported
into CDT. Why is this happing? Any thought?
Thanks in advance,
Ho.
"Ho An" <ho.an@samsung.com> wrote in message
news:bu2v41$na7$1@eclipse.org...
> Dear all,
>
> Does anybody know why the size of executable files which are built in
> different among CDT versions with same Makefile? Have used CDT
> 1.1/1.2(standard), and noticed the size of executable files are different
> little bit. Also, size of executable files are different from file made
in
> comman line with Linux (same Makefile)
>
> Does anybody have clue?
> Thanks,
> Ho.
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.08208 seconds
Home