Skip to main content



      Home
Home » Eclipse Projects » GEF » 2 unreaded messages
2 unreaded messages [message #87875] Sun, 20 July 2003 16:07 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: g.wagenknecht.planet-wagenknecht.de

Hi!

Does somebody else see two unreaded messages like I do or am I the only one
getting two unreaded messages each time I visit the GEF newsgroup?

Cu, Gunnar
Re: 2 unreaded messages [message #87891 is a reply to message #87875] Sun, 20 July 2003 20:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: valentinbaciu.hotmail.com

You're not alone ;-)
I think the newsgroup server hasn't recovered properly since the last
maintenance. Some other Eclipse newsgroups suffer from this condition as
well. By the way, I'm running MS Outlook Express.
Valentin

"Gunnar Wagenknecht" <g.wagenknecht@planet-wagenknecht.de> wrote in message
news:bfesq5$qjj$1@eclipse.org...
> Hi!
>
> Does somebody else see two unreaded messages like I do or am I the only
one
> getting two unreaded messages each time I visit the GEF newsgroup?
>
> Cu, Gunnar
>
>
And now there are 7. Yea! [message #88040 is a reply to message #87875] Wed, 23 July 2003 10:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: none.us.ibm.com

"Gunnar Wagenknecht" <g.wagenknecht@planet-wagenknecht.de> wrote in message
news:bfesq5$qjj$1@eclipse.org...
> Hi!
>
> Does somebody else see two unreaded messages like I do or am I the only
one
> getting two unreaded messages each time I visit the GEF newsgroup?
>
> Cu, Gunnar
>
>
Re: And now there are 7. Yea! [message #88083 is a reply to message #88040] Wed, 23 July 2003 12:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: g.wagenknecht.planet-wagenknecht.de

Randy Hudson wrote:
> "Gunnar Wagenknecht" <g.wagenknecht@planet-wagenknecht.de> wrote in
> message news:bfesq5$qjj$1@eclipse.org...

yep, SEVEN.

Webmaster of eclipse.org said that these problems exist since the last
rebuild of the newsserver but only on different news clients (mozilla no,
netscape and oe yes)...

Cu, Gunnar

BTW, what is the excact tense when using "since" in the above sentence? I
don't get it.

exist since
had existed since
have been existing since
Re: And now there are 7. Yea! [message #88324 is a reply to message #88083] Thu, 24 July 2003 18:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Gunnar Wagenknecht wrote:
> Webmaster of eclipse.org said that these problems exist since the last
> rebuild of the newsserver but only on different news clients (mozilla no,
> netscape and oe yes)...
>
> BTW, what is the excact tense when using "since" in the above sentence? I
> don't get it.
>
> exist since
> had existed since
> have been existing since

....these problems have existed since the last...

But don't take my word for it, I'm Scottish and can't be trusted as an
authority on English ;-)

--
Colin M Sharples/New Zealand/IBM, IT Architect, IBM Global Services
sharples@nz.ibm.com, t: 64-4-5769853, m: 64-21-402085, f: 64-4-5765616
"Sometimes I think the surest sign intelligent life exists
elsewhere in the Universe is that it's never tried to contact us"
Re: And now there are 7. Yea! [message #88341 is a reply to message #88324] Thu, 24 July 2003 20:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: muelleimer.usenet.katzien.de

Hallo!

* Colin Sharples <sharples@nz1.ibm.com> wrote:
> Gunnar Wagenknecht wrote:
>> exist since
>> had existed since
>> have been existing since
> ...these problems have existed since the last...

My school book said: 'since/for' -> have been existing.

> But don't take my word for it, I'm Scottish and can't be trusted as an
> authority on English ;-)

I cannot either: just school english and that rather bad :)

Jan
Re: And now there are 7. Yea! [message #88475 is a reply to message #88341] Fri, 25 July 2003 08:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: g.wagenknecht.planet-wagenknecht.de

Jan Schulz wrote:

> My school book said: 'since/for' -> have been existing.

That's why I'm asking. My schoolbook said this yeeeeaaaaars ago but after
dealing some years with english in companies, newsgroups, mails and
countries I don't feel realy comfortable with that.

Cu, Gunnar
Re: And now there are 7. Yea! [message #88627 is a reply to message #88341] Sun, 27 July 2003 18:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Jan Schulz wrote:
>>>exist since
>>>had existed since
>>>have been existing since
>>
>>...these problems have existed since the last...
>
> My school book said: 'since/for' -> have been existing.

This is probably one of those cases where common usage has overtaken the
strict grammar. I can't imagine anybody actually saying "have been
existing since" even if it is grammatically correct. I think that's a
gerund, a grammatical construct that has pretty much gone out of fashion
in colloquial English. But then, English grammar isn't really taught in
the UK any more - I learnt most of my English grammar from my Latin teacher!

--
Colin M Sharples/New Zealand/IBM, IT Architect, IBM Global Services
sharples@nz.ibm.com, t: 64-4-5769853, m: 64-21-402085, f: 64-4-5765616
"Sometimes I think the surest sign intelligent life exists
elsewhere in the Universe is that it's never tried to contact us"
Re: And now there are 7. Yea! [message #88643 is a reply to message #88627] Sun, 27 July 2003 19:42 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: g.wagenknecht.planet-wagenknecht.de

Colin Sharples wrote:
> I think that's a
> gerund, a grammatical construct that has pretty much gone out of
> fashion in colloquial English.

Thanks for the info!

Cu, Gunnar
Previous Topic:how do you reveal an edit part when model object selected via outline
Next Topic:GEF 2.1.1 and Eclipse 3.0 Integration Build
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Jul 18 04:22:18 EDT 2025

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.43654 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top