| Running a JUnit test remotly on 2 (or more) machine in PARALLEL [message #84409] |
Wed, 27 September 2006 13:21  |
 Bertrand Quenin
Messages: 70
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
Hi,
I've problems with parallel test execution (it simply doesn't work).
I've created a JUnit test (the simplest test ever), and its associated
artifact.
I've created 2 locations: A and B,
I've paired the artifact with both location A and location B in a
deployment.
Of course, agent controllers are running on machine A and B.
When I execute the test suite with this deployment, test runs on machine A
when the location pair "artifact/A" is the top most in the deployment,
and, similarly, runs on machine B when the location "artifact/B" is the
topmost in the deployment pairs list.
What i'd expect is to have the testsuite running in parallel on machine A
& B and get 2 test execution results. Is it possible ? If yes, how can i
achieve this ?
|
|
|
|
| Re: Running a JUnit test remotly on 2 (or more) machine in PARALLEL [message #84709 is a reply to message #84632] |
Mon, 02 October 2006 08:10  |
Bertrand Quenin
Messages: 70
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
Joe Toomey wrote:
> Hi Bertrand,
> What you describe is something that was envisioned in the design but
> never implemented. As you point out, today the test is executed on the
> first paired location. Please submit an enhancement request for this
> type of functionality,
Done, here it is: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=159434
and also consider contributing if you'd like to
> see it implemented promptly. I'd be happy to assist in explaining how
> the current implementation works.
I would be pleased too. As I'm a bit in a hurry, i's love to implement
this with your help. I've reverse the TPTP core code a lot of times and i
know approximately how it works.
An ideal solution would be to implement this in an extension, this way,
I could work in parallel of current developments.
Eventually, i've no ideo about becoming a contributor, how does it work ?
Thanks for your help.
> Thanks,
> --Joe
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03348 seconds
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
