| ATL rule transform: output model format [message #83046] |
Fri, 30 May 2008 11:14  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: min.kong.morganstanley.com
Hi,
Is XMI the *only* output model format supported by an ATL *rule transform*?
If not, what are the other available formats for the output model as a
result of a rule transform, and how does one configure these formats?
Thanks,
Min
|
|
|
|
| Re: ATL rule transform: output model format [message #83442 is a reply to message #83061] |
Mon, 02 June 2008 10:40  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: min.kong.morganstanley.com
Hi,
What I meant by "output format" is the serialization form/language by
which the output is produced, as a result of an ATL rule transform.
My understanding is that, an ATL rule transform always produces the output
in XMI (while the output data/content can express/represent an UML model,
any model based on MOF, or models of other metamodel languages).
What I'm interested in, is getting an ATL rule transform output in a
non-XMI format. I am not sure if it is possible with ATL rules. I think
that an ATL rule transform always gives a file in XMI. Please confirm.
-Min
>Aamir Mehmood wrote:
> Min wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is XMI the *only* output model format supported by an ATL *rule transform*?
>>
>> If not, what are the other available formats for the output model as a
>> result of a rule transform, and how does one configure these formats?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Min
>>
> Hi Min, I will also be eager to view other comments but at least i know
> that some other formats like .uml and .ecore and written in xmi file
> format. So xmi will be the underlaying language but the file formats are
> different. I wonder what else u mean by file formats !!!
> Regards,
> -aamir-
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04268 seconds
Home