| Something about CDT [message #81304] |
Sat, 27 September 2003 04:00  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm using SourceInsight before, it's a very good ide for source edit, I
think maybe CDT could refer some good feather from SourceInsight.
Thank you!
|
|
|
|
| Re: Something about CDT [message #81609 is a reply to message #81538] |
Thu, 02 October 2003 03:32  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
alain wrote:
> Qin Feng wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I'm using SourceInsight before, it's a very good ide for source edit, I
>> think maybe CDT could refer some good feather from SourceInsight.
>> Thank you!
>
> You will have to give more then that, what exactly in SourceInsight
> would be good to provide in CDT, since you've use this IDE.
Hopefully not the Font and Color settings... I still have sore eyes when
thinking about the screenshots.
What I think were good things to have is the graphical representation on
#include dependencies and usage dependencies, also like Source Navigator
from Redhat does have.
And, for sure, I'd like to have the refactoring stuff working in 2.0 asap.
;) But on this point, I think, I don't tell you any new.
|
|
|
| Re: Something about CDT [message #82054 is a reply to message #81609] |
Fri, 03 October 2003 22:44 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Henning Riedel wrote:
> alain wrote:
> > Qin Feng wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> I'm using SourceInsight before, it's a very good ide for source edit, I
> >> think maybe CDT could refer some good feather from SourceInsight.
> >> Thank you!
> >
> > You will have to give more then that, what exactly in SourceInsight
> > would be good to provide in CDT, since you've use this IDE.
> Hopefully not the Font and Color settings... I still have sore eyes when
> thinking about the screenshots.
> What I think were good things to have is the graphical representation on
> #include dependencies and usage dependencies, also like Source Navigator
> from Redhat does have.
> And, for sure, I'd like to have the refactoring stuff working in 2.0 asap.
> ;) But on this point, I think, I don't tell you any new.
Well, personally, I like more different colors in source editor:), which
could let me know which is member and which is temp var, helpful for
refactoring.
Another one is context window, useful in reading source, I think.
And replacing one word in the whole project is also useful for I want to
change a function name not only in a file but also in every where being
invoked.
Additionally, poping up a list and using tab to select a member when I
typing a dot after a object are also helpful.
Thank you for your hard work on CDT, and I'm waiting for Refactoring in
CDT later! :)
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03489 seconds
Home