Skip to main content



      Home
Home » Modeling » Epsilon » @gmf not recognized - setup problem?
@gmf not recognized - setup problem? [message #7174] Tue, 23 December 2008 07:41 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Editing the 'filesystem' example fails with an error: "Encountered "@ gmf
package" at line... However, pure Emfatic editing seems to work properly,
including ecore model generation.

It seems as if Eugenia is not properly installed or doesn't work in my
installation at all.

Installed Software (Windows XP, SP3)
----------------------------------------------------
- Eclipse Ganymede 3.4.0
+ Emfatic 0.3.0.200810132307
+ Epsilon Core 0.8.3
+ Epsilon EMF/GMF Live Validation 0.8.3
+ Epsilon EMF/GMF Scripting Validation 0.8.3
+ Epsilon Eugenia 0.8.3
+ ...
+ openArchitectureWare 4.3.0
+ GMF 3.4.0
+ ...
among others

Plug-in Details
----------------------------------------------------
...
Eugenia Plug-in 0.8.3
Eugenia Runtime Plug-in 0.8.3
...

The same installation on my notebook shows the same problem, probably a
very stupid (beginner's) problem...
Re: @gmf not recognized - setup problem? [message #7198 is a reply to message #7174] Tue, 23 December 2008 07:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Hi Reto,

I assume you are getting the error in the Emfatic editor. The latest
version of Emfatic does not seem to support annotations without details.
I'd suggest you add a dummy detail as a workaround:

e.g. @gmf(foo="bar")

Cheers,
Dimitris

Reto Weiss wrote:
> Editing the 'filesystem' example fails with an error: "Encountered "@
> gmf package" at line... However, pure Emfatic editing seems to work
> properly, including ecore model generation.
>
> It seems as if Eugenia is not properly installed or doesn't work in my
> installation at all.
>
> Installed Software (Windows XP, SP3)
> ----------------------------------------------------
> - Eclipse Ganymede 3.4.0
> + Emfatic 0.3.0.200810132307
> + Epsilon Core 0.8.3
> + Epsilon EMF/GMF Live Validation 0.8.3
> + Epsilon EMF/GMF Scripting Validation 0.8.3
> + Epsilon Eugenia 0.8.3
> + ...
> + openArchitectureWare 4.3.0
> + GMF 3.4.0
> + ...
> among others
>
> Plug-in Details
> ----------------------------------------------------
> ..
> Eugenia Plug-in 0.8.3
> Eugenia Runtime Plug-in 0.8.3
> ..
>
> The same installation on my notebook shows the same problem, probably a
> very stupid (beginner's) problem...
>
>
Re: @gmf not recognized - setup problem? [message #7222 is a reply to message #7174] Tue, 23 December 2008 08:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
I guess I found the answer myself:
---
Certain versions of Emfatic do not support annotations without details
(e.g. @gmf or @gmf.diagram). You can use dummy details as a workaround
(e.g. @gmf(foo="bar"))
---
Re: @gmf not recognized - setup problem? [message #7246 is a reply to message #7198] Tue, 23 December 2008 08:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Yes, I just found it myself. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Re: @gmf not recognized - setup problem? [message #7269 is a reply to message #7246] Tue, 23 December 2008 08:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
No worries. Actually, I added the sentence you found in the
troubleshooting section after I responded to your message.

Cheers,
Dimitris

Reto Weiss wrote:
> Yes, I just found it myself. Sorry for the inconvenience.
>
Re: @gmf not recognized - setup problem? [message #7288 is a reply to message #7269] Tue, 23 December 2008 08:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
I felt like a fool, thank you for this clarification.

Now things work fine - really cool, I like Eugenia because tweaking all
the GMF helper models (once the are magically created) isn't a very
straight forward approach, I fear.

Is there any ongoing development in this (Eugenia) area?
Any links about that?
Re: @gmf not recognized - setup problem? [message #7303 is a reply to message #7288] Tue, 23 December 2008 10:02 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
One thing that is in the development queue is enabling users to
customize the produced GMF models by contributing transformations that
will be executed on top of the built-in ones. There are also plans to
add first-class support for SVG images in nodes (see
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=254990). Needless to say,
we are always open to any suggestions for improvement by the community -
so if you have any, we would really like to hear them!

Cheers,
Dimitris

Reto Weiss wrote:
> I felt like a fool, thank you for this clarification.
>
> Now things work fine - really cool, I like Eugenia because tweaking all
> the GMF helper models (once the are magically created) isn't a very
> straight forward approach, I fear.
>
> Is there any ongoing development in this (Eugenia) area? Any links about
> that?
>
Re: @gmf not recognized - setup problem? [message #563293 is a reply to message #7174] Tue, 23 December 2008 07:47 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
Hi Reto,

I assume you are getting the error in the Emfatic editor. The latest
version of Emfatic does not seem to support annotations without details.
I'd suggest you add a dummy detail as a workaround:

e.g. @gmf(foo="bar")

Cheers,
Dimitris

Reto Weiss wrote:
> Editing the 'filesystem' example fails with an error: "Encountered "@
> gmf package" at line... However, pure Emfatic editing seems to work
> properly, including ecore model generation.
>
> It seems as if Eugenia is not properly installed or doesn't work in my
> installation at all.
>
> Installed Software (Windows XP, SP3)
> ----------------------------------------------------
> - Eclipse Ganymede 3.4.0
> + Emfatic 0.3.0.200810132307
> + Epsilon Core 0.8.3
> + Epsilon EMF/GMF Live Validation 0.8.3
> + Epsilon EMF/GMF Scripting Validation 0.8.3
> + Epsilon Eugenia 0.8.3
> + ...
> + openArchitectureWare 4.3.0
> + GMF 3.4.0
> + ...
> among others
>
> Plug-in Details
> ----------------------------------------------------
> ..
> Eugenia Plug-in 0.8.3
> Eugenia Runtime Plug-in 0.8.3
> ..
>
> The same installation on my notebook shows the same problem, probably a
> very stupid (beginner's) problem...
>
>
Re: @gmf not recognized - setup problem? [message #563318 is a reply to message #7174] Tue, 23 December 2008 08:22 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
I guess I found the answer myself:
---
Certain versions of Emfatic do not support annotations without details
(e.g. @gmf or @gmf.diagram). You can use dummy details as a workaround
(e.g. @gmf(foo="bar"))
---
Re: @gmf not recognized - setup problem? [message #563343 is a reply to message #7198] Tue, 23 December 2008 08:23 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
Yes, I just found it myself. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Re: @gmf not recognized - setup problem? [message #563365 is a reply to message #7246] Tue, 23 December 2008 08:25 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
No worries. Actually, I added the sentence you found in the
troubleshooting section after I responded to your message.

Cheers,
Dimitris

Reto Weiss wrote:
> Yes, I just found it myself. Sorry for the inconvenience.
>
Re: @gmf not recognized - setup problem? [message #563388 is a reply to message #7269] Tue, 23 December 2008 08:46 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
I felt like a fool, thank you for this clarification.

Now things work fine - really cool, I like Eugenia because tweaking all
the GMF helper models (once the are magically created) isn't a very
straight forward approach, I fear.

Is there any ongoing development in this (Eugenia) area?
Any links about that?
Re: @gmf not recognized - setup problem? [message #563407 is a reply to message #7288] Tue, 23 December 2008 10:02 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
One thing that is in the development queue is enabling users to
customize the produced GMF models by contributing transformations that
will be executed on top of the built-in ones. There are also plans to
add first-class support for SVG images in nodes (see
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=254990). Needless to say,
we are always open to any suggestions for improvement by the community -
so if you have any, we would really like to hear them!

Cheers,
Dimitris

Reto Weiss wrote:
> I felt like a fool, thank you for this clarification.
>
> Now things work fine - really cool, I like Eugenia because tweaking all
> the GMF helper models (once the are magically created) isn't a very
> straight forward approach, I fear.
>
> Is there any ongoing development in this (Eugenia) area? Any links about
> that?
>
Previous Topic:@gmf not recognized - setup problem?
Next Topic:org.eclipse.epsilon.eugenia.validation missing from an Epsilon product build
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu May 08 21:17:26 EDT 2025

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.09839 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top