|
|
Re: CVS or GIT? [message #730056 is a reply to message #729893] |
Tue, 27 September 2011 14:49 |
Hernan Gonzalez Messages: 188 Registered: October 2010 Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina |
Senior Member |
|
|
Ah, thanks. I failed to guess that https:// is for authorized access, http:// for anonymous (is that so? perhaps the wiki should'nt mention then https:// as valid protocol for anonymous access)
I don't recall now when/how I was directed to the CVS download, (from the Eclipse software update?) perhaps it would be convenient to add some warning file to the CVS files, to state that not the valid repositories are in GIT.
A doubt about required plugins: the help page lists
org.eclipse.graphiti
org.eclipse.graphiti.ui
org.eclipse.graphiti.mm
as (apparently) the "core" (needed) plugins, "org.eclipse.graphiti.pattern" for an "framework for an alternative generic approach to combine all implementation aspects in one pattern" (no idea about what that means, I guess for a normal scenario it's not needed), plus other miscelaneous (docs, tutorials, tests) plugins: org.eclipse.graphiti.doc org.eclipse.graphiti.examples.common org.eclipse.graphiti.examples.tutorial org.eclipse.graphiti.tests
In the repository (and in the 0.8.1 download file) I see more plugins. Apart from sources, and some that are seemingly doc-test related, I see:
org.eclipse.graphiti.export.batik
org.eclipse.graphiti.ui.capabilities
org.eclipse.graphiti.releng (only in repository)
org.eclipse.graphiti.site (only in repository ; website?)
I wonder if which ones are needed, and if the above page needs some update.
[Updated on: Tue, 27 September 2011 17:43] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.23983 seconds