|
|
|
Re: WSDL Validator issue [message #77969 is a reply to message #77952] |
Tue, 30 June 2009 15:24 |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: valentinbaciu.hotmail.com
Hi Khaled, the WTP WSDL tools, the validator included, conform to the WSDL
schema provided by the WS-I Basic Profile 1.1. See the last paragraph here
http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.1-2004-08-24.htm l#WSDL_Extensions.
As you've pointed out, some of the WS* specifications require extensibility
elements in places not supported by the original WSDL 1.1 W3C note. The
underlying Java object models used to manipulate WSDL (JWSDL/WSDL4J and the
WTP WSDL EMF model) have also evolved to allow extensibility elements for
all WSDL elements.
I hope this helps.
Regards, Valentin
"khaled sharief" <khaledsharief@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b1ef36f70688811ff5686162e3ab8b0b$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Hi Ed,
>
> This is the version of WTP that I'm using.
> Version: 3.0.3.v200809250443
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Mohammad Khaled Sharief
>
|
|
|
Re: WSDL Validator issue [message #604250 is a reply to message #77916] |
Mon, 29 June 2009 12:41 |
Ed Merks Messages: 33264 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Khaled,
This is the XSD newsgroup, not a WSDL newsgroup. It's best to ask on
the Web Tools newsgroup, which I've added to the "to" list of the reply,
so no need to repost. You might want to clarify which version of WTP
you're using.
khaled sharief wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As per WSDL 1.1 Spec its not valid to have extensibility elements in
> the porttype element but when i place any extensibility element in
> porttype
> e.g.
>
> <jaxws:bindings>
> <jaxws:class name="Service1"/>
> </jaxws:bindings>
>
> the validator doesn't report any problem. This is also the same in
> Altova XML Spy.
>
> Did i miss anything in the specification or will this be a bug in WSDL
> validator and Altova XML Spy validator.
>
> Reference - http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl#A3
>
> Regards,
> Khaled Sharief
>
>
>
>
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04045 seconds