Home » Modeling » EMF » EMF Validation
| |
| Re: EMF Validation [message #726492 is a reply to message #726405] |
Sun, 18 September 2011 09:34   |
 Volker Schilling
Messages: 14
Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Am 18.09.2011 00:22, schrieb Ed Merks:
> Volker,
>
> Comments below.
>
>
> On 17/09/2011 3:07 PM, Volker Schilling wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I had a little application that runs with an EMF model. Now I'm trying
>> to validate cross document references using ab project builder and EMF
>> Valifation Framework. It works perfect in most cases. ...
>>
>> I have an Eclipse Workspace Resource called: TestCase1.case
>>
>> 1) If I rename this resource to TestCase2.case
>> EcoreUtil.UnresolvedProxyCrossReferencer.find(...) finds a broken cross
>> document reference - so far so good.
>>
>> 2) If I rename this resource to
>> testCase1.caseEcoreUtil.UnresolvedProxyCrossReferencer.find(...) doesent
>> find a broken cross document reference if I call the Constraint Checker
>> from the builder.
>>
>> Is there anyone that can help me?
> So you've only changed the case of the file? And you're running on
> Windows where the file system isn't case sensitive? That might well
> explain it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Volker
Hi Ed,
thanks for your response!
Yes I run on Windows. The problem is, after I load the resource in my
Editor the cross reference is broken and I can't resolve the proxy.
If I run the validation from the editor itself after I load it throught
an editing domain, the validation detetcts the broken reference but not
in the builder.
From the builder I call it like this:
ResourceSet resourceSet = new ResourceSetImpl();
URI fileURI = URI.createFileURI(resource.getLocation().toOSString());
emfResource = resourceSet.getResource(fileURI, true);
if (emfResource != null) {
IStatus status = validator.validate(emfResource.getContents());
try {
MarkerUtil.createMarkers(status);
} catch (CoreException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
From the Editor I call it like this:
URI resourceURI = EditUIUtil.getURI(getEditorInput());
Resource resource = null;
try {
resource = editingDomain.getResourceSet().getResource(resourceURI, true);
}
catch (Exception e) {
resource = editingDomain.getResourceSet().getResource(resourceURI,
false);
}
IBatchValidator validator =
(IBatchValidator)ModelValidationService.getInstance()
.newValidator(EvaluationMode.BATCH);
validator.setIncludeLiveConstraints(true);
if (resource != null) {
IStatus status = validator.validate(resource.getContents());
try {
MarkerUtil.createMarkers(status);
} catch (CoreException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
Is there a mistake in the way I call it, and why is there a difference.
I can life with the fact, that windows fs don't care about the case,
but only if the editor can handle the corss reference correct in that case.
Thanks,
Volker
|
|
|
| Re: EMF Validation [message #726529 is a reply to message #726492] |
Sun, 18 September 2011 14:04 |
Ed Merks
Messages: 33252
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Volker,<br>
<br>
Comments below.<br>
<br>
On 18/09/2011 2:34 AM, Volker Schilling wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:j54da6$d3c$1@news.eclipse.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Am 18.09.2011 00:22, schrieb Ed Merks:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Volker,
Comments below.
On 17/09/2011 3:07 PM, Volker Schilling wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi folks,
I had a little application that runs with an EMF model. Now I'm trying
to validate cross document references using ab project builder and EMF
Valifation Framework. It works perfect in most cases. ...
I have an Eclipse Workspace Resource called: TestCase1.case
1) If I rename this resource to TestCase2.case
EcoreUtil.UnresolvedProxyCrossReferencer.find(...) finds a broken cross
document reference - so far so good.
2) If I rename this resource to
testCase1.caseEcoreUtil.UnresolvedProxyCrossReferencer.find(...) doesent
find a broken cross document reference if I call the Constraint Checker
from the builder.
Is there anyone that can help me?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">So you've only changed the case of the file? And you're running on
Windows where the file system isn't case sensitive? That might well
explain it.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Thanks,
Volker
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Hi Ed,
thanks for your response!
Yes I run on Windows. The problem is, after I load the resource in my
Editor the cross reference is broken and I can't resolve the proxy.</pre>
</blockquote>
I believe the workspace itself isn't case insensitive, even if the
file system is...<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:j54da6$d3c$1@news.eclipse.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
If I run the validation from the editor itself after I load it throught
an editing domain, the validation detetcts the broken reference but not
in the builder.
From the builder I call it like this:
ResourceSet resourceSet = new ResourceSetImpl();
URI fileURI = URI.createFileURI(resource.getLocation().toOSString()); </pre>
</blockquote>
You're not accessing it via the workspace. Is there a reason for
not using platform:/resource?<br>
<ul>
<li class="toclevel-2"><a
href="http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/EMF/FAQ#How_do_I_map_between_an_EMF_Resource_and_an_Eclipse_IFile.3F"><span
class="tocnumber">2.44</span> <span class="toctext">How do
I map between an EMF Resource and an Eclipse IFile?</span></a><br>
</li>
</ul>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:j54da6$d3c$1@news.eclipse.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
emfResource = resourceSet.getResource(fileURI, true);
if (emfResource != null) {
IStatus status = validator.validate(emfResource.getContents());
try {
MarkerUtil.createMarkers(status);
} catch (CoreException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
From the Editor I call it like this:
URI resourceURI = EditUIUtil.getURI(getEditorInput());
Resource resource = null;
try {
resource = editingDomain.getResourceSet().getResource(resourceURI, true);
}
catch (Exception e) {
resource = editingDomain.getResourceSet().getResource(resourceURI,
false);
}
IBatchValidator validator =
(IBatchValidator)ModelValidationService.getInstance()
.newValidator(EvaluationMode.BATCH);
validator.setIncludeLiveConstraints(true);
if (resource != null) {
IStatus status = validator.validate(resource.getContents());
try {
MarkerUtil.createMarkers(status);
} catch (CoreException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
Is there a mistake in the way I call it, and why is there a difference.</pre>
</blockquote>
In one case you're accessing the file system directly and in the
other you're using the workspace.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:j54da6$d3c$1@news.eclipse.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
I can life with the fact, that windows fs don't care about the case,
but only if the editor can handle the corss reference correct in that case.
Thanks,
Volker
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
| Re: EMF Validation [message #726532 is a reply to message #726529] |
Sun, 18 September 2011 14:38 |
Volker Schilling
Messages: 14
Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Am 18.09.2011 16:04, schrieb Ed Merks:
> Volker,
>
> Comments below.
>
> On 18/09/2011 2:34 AM, Volker Schilling wrote:
>> Am 18.09.2011 00:22, schrieb Ed Merks:
>>> Volker,
>>>
>>> Comments below.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17/09/2011 3:07 PM, Volker Schilling wrote:
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> I had a little application that runs with an EMF model. Now I'm trying
>>>> to validate cross document references using ab project builder and EMF
>>>> Valifation Framework. It works perfect in most cases. ...
>>>>
>>>> I have an Eclipse Workspace Resource called: TestCase1.case
>>>>
>>>> 1) If I rename this resource to TestCase2.case
>>>> EcoreUtil.UnresolvedProxyCrossReferencer.find(...) finds a broken cross
>>>> document reference - so far so good.
>>>>
>>>> 2) If I rename this resource to
>>>> testCase1.caseEcoreUtil.UnresolvedProxyCrossReferencer.find(...) doesent
>>>> find a broken cross document reference if I call the Constraint Checker
>>>> from the builder.
>>>>
>>>> Is there anyone that can help me?
>>> So you've only changed the case of the file? And you're running on
>>> Windows where the file system isn't case sensitive? That might well
>>> explain it.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Volker
>> Hi Ed,
>>
>> thanks for your response!
>>
>> Yes I run on Windows. The problem is, after I load the resource in my
>> Editor the cross reference is broken and I can't resolve the proxy.
> I believe the workspace itself isn't case insensitive, even if the file
> system is...
>>
>> If I run the validation from the editor itself after I load it throught
>> an editing domain, the validation detetcts the broken reference but not
>> in the builder.
>>
>> From the builder I call it like this:
>>
>> ResourceSet resourceSet = new ResourceSetImpl();
>> URI fileURI = URI.createFileURI(resource.getLocation().toOSString());
> You're not accessing it via the workspace. Is there a reason for not
> using platform:/resource?
>
> * 2.44 How do I map between an EMF Resource and an Eclipse IFile?
> <http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/EMF/FAQ#How_do_I_map_between_an_EMF_Resource_and_an_Eclipse_IFile.3F>
>
>
>>
>>
>> emfResource = resourceSet.getResource(fileURI, true);
>>
>> if (emfResource != null) {
>>
>> IStatus status = validator.validate(emfResource.getContents());
>>
>> try {
>> MarkerUtil.createMarkers(status);
>> } catch (CoreException e) {
>> e.printStackTrace();
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>> From the Editor I call it like this:
>>
>> URI resourceURI = EditUIUtil.getURI(getEditorInput());
>>
>> Resource resource = null;
>>
>> try {
>>
>> resource = editingDomain.getResourceSet().getResource(resourceURI, true);
>>
>> }
>> catch (Exception e) {
>>
>> resource = editingDomain.getResourceSet().getResource(resourceURI,
>> false);
>>
>> }
>>
>> IBatchValidator validator =
>> (IBatchValidator)ModelValidationService.getInstance()
>> .newValidator(EvaluationMode.BATCH);
>>
>> validator.setIncludeLiveConstraints(true);
>>
>> if (resource != null) {
>>
>> IStatus status = validator.validate(resource.getContents());
>>
>> try {
>> MarkerUtil.createMarkers(status);
>> } catch (CoreException e) {
>> e.printStackTrace();
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>> Is there a mistake in the way I call it, and why is there a difference.
> In one case you're accessing the file system directly and in the other
> you're using the workspace.
>> I can life with the fact, that windows fs don't care about the case,
>> but only if the editor can handle the corss reference correct in that case.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Volker
>>
>>
>>
Thanks!
now ist is detected as expected!
Greetings,
Volker
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Nov 10 19:50:35 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03730 seconds |
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
