| RE: [pdt-dev] PHP 5.3.0 support [message #72183] |
Fri, 30 May 2008 17:27  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
In a response to Runar Olsen,
> "Is there any plans for adding support for the new language features
introduced in PHP 5.3.0 any time soon? I'm currently working on a project of
mine where I have started to take advantage of the newly addition to the scope
operator which allows you to use a variable as the class name just like you
can when creating a new class. Today this results in a parse error in PDT."
http://www.eclipse.org/pdt/plans/php_plan_1_1.php marks milestone #2 for
PHP 5.3 features. support. But it is obviously not relevant since PHP 5.3
is delayed and there are features that are not code freeze yet.
Meantime, we should think about a list of wanted PHP 5.3 IDE features,
since there are a few syntax and semantic innovations in this release
(like namespaces, lsb, etc.).
Of course syntax coloring is the first step.
Any ideas?
|
|
|
| Re: [pdt-dev] PHP 5.3.0 support [message #72219 is a reply to message #72183] |
Sun, 01 June 2008 01:35  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
Some most needed features from me:
- Rework all PHP element views, so namespace will be visible as well.
- Code Assist namespace/static:: completion.
- Open namespace declaration.
Roy Ganor wrote:
> In a response to Runar Olsen,
>
>> "Is there any plans for adding support for the new language features
> introduced in PHP 5.3.0 any time soon? I'm currently working on a
> project of mine where I have started to take advantage of the newly
> addition to the scope operator which allows you to use a variable as the
> class name just like you can when creating a new class. Today this
> results in a parse error in PDT."
>
> http://www.eclipse.org/pdt/plans/php_plan_1_1.php marks milestone #2 for
> PHP 5.3 features. support. But it is obviously not relevant since PHP
> 5.3 is delayed and there are features that are not code freeze yet.
> Meantime, we should think about a list of wanted PHP 5.3 IDE features,
> since there are a few syntax and semantic innovations in this release
> (like namespaces, lsb, etc.).
>
> Of course syntax coloring is the first step.
> Any ideas?
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03759 seconds
Home