|
Re: Difference between EMF SDO and Tuscany [message #71440 is a reply to message #71421] |
Fri, 26 January 2007 21:13  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com
Christian,
EMF's SDO implementation is an implement of SDO 1.0. Tuscany has an
implementation of SDO 2.x. EMF's SDO 1.0 implementation relies on a
design where the SDO types and properties are adapters of the Ecore
model whereas Tuscany's SDO 2.0 implement extends EMF 2.2.2's Ecore
model to directly implement the SDO type and property APIs, resulting in
potentially better performance. In both implementations, every
DataObject will also be an EObject/InternalEObject.
Christian Frederiksen wrote:
> What is the relationship between EMF SDO and Tuscany SDO?
>
>
>
>
|
|
|
Re: Difference between EMF SDO and Tuscany [message #599530 is a reply to message #71421] |
Fri, 26 January 2007 21:13  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Christian,
EMF's SDO implementation is an implement of SDO 1.0. Tuscany has an
implementation of SDO 2.x. EMF's SDO 1.0 implementation relies on a
design where the SDO types and properties are adapters of the Ecore
model whereas Tuscany's SDO 2.0 implement extends EMF 2.2.2's Ecore
model to directly implement the SDO type and property APIs, resulting in
potentially better performance. In both implementations, every
DataObject will also be an EObject/InternalEObject.
Christian Frederiksen wrote:
> What is the relationship between EMF SDO and Tuscany SDO?
>
>
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05540 seconds