| (no subject) [message #687104] |
Mon, 30 May 2011 18:18  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
the last days, I tried to understand the NET4J framework, to implement
an own protocol.
Now I found one point, which I dont understand.
There are some factories and element processors, which a implemented
inside the org.eclipse.net4j.util plugin.
The factory will be registered but now inside the
org.eclipse.emf.cdo.server plugin
Exactly this are:
<extension point="org.eclipse.net4j.util.factories">
<factory
productGroup="org.eclipse.net4j.Negotiators"
type="challenge"
class="org.eclipse.net4j.util.security.ChallengeNegotiatorFactory"
/>
</extension>
and:
<extension point="org.eclipse.net4j.util.elementProcessors">
<elementProcessor
class="org.eclipse.net4j.util.security.ChallengeNegotiatorConfigurer"
/>
</extension>
Do this was forgotten and it is a bug, or is there a specific reason?
Greetings
Heiko
|
|
|
|
| (no subject) [message #687156 is a reply to message #687129] |
Tue, 07 June 2011 17:36  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Eike
thanks for your answer.
I've looked into the old versions of net4j and CDO inside the svn
repository and since CDO 2.0 there are this combination.
If I do understand right the net4j framework with his IContainer system
and the factories, it is impossible to create a ChallengeNegotiator over
the container method
container.getElement(NegotiatorFactory.PRODUCT_GROUP, type, description);
as there will not used the cdo server plugin.
Greetings
Heiko
Am 02.06.2011 12:56, schrieb Eike Stepper:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> Unfortunately I do not remember excatly why that has been changed. I
> think it was related with the fact that you normally want to provide
> your own implementations. Note that you can easily contribute the
> factories of your choice from your own bundle.
>
> Cheers
> /Eike
>
> ----
> http://www.esc-net.de
> http://thegordian.blogspot.com
> http://twitter.com/eikestepper
>
>
> Am 31.05.2011 00:18, schrieb Heiko Ahlig:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the last days, I tried to understand the NET4J framework, to implement
>> an own protocol.
>>
>> Now I found one point, which I dont understand.
>> There are some factories and element processors, which a implemented
>> inside the org.eclipse.net4j.util plugin.
>>
>> The factory will be registered but now inside the
>> org.eclipse.emf.cdo.server plugin
>>
>> Exactly this are:
>>
>> <extension point="org.eclipse.net4j.util.factories">
>> <factory
>> productGroup="org.eclipse.net4j.Negotiators"
>> type="challenge"
>> class="org.eclipse.net4j.util.security.ChallengeNegotiatorFactory"
>> />
>> </extension>
>>
>> and:
>>
>> <extension point="org.eclipse.net4j.util.elementProcessors">
>> <elementProcessor
>> class="org.eclipse.net4j.util.security.ChallengeNegotiatorConfigurer"
>> />
>> </extension>
>>
>> Do this was forgotten and it is a bug, or is there a specific reason?
>>
>> Greetings
>>
>> Heiko
|
|
|
| (no subject) [message #687366 is a reply to message #687104] |
Thu, 02 June 2011 06:56 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Heiko,
Unfortunately I do not remember excatly why that has been changed. I think it was related with the fact that you normally want to provide your own implementations. Note that you can easily contribute the factories of your choice from your own bundle.
Cheers
/Eike
----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
Am 31.05.2011 00:18, schrieb Heiko Ahlig:
> Hi,
>
> the last days, I tried to understand the NET4J framework, to implement an own protocol.
>
> Now I found one point, which I dont understand.
> There are some factories and element processors, which a implemented inside the org.eclipse.net4j.util plugin.
>
> The factory will be registered but now inside the org.eclipse.emf.cdo.server plugin
>
> Exactly this are:
>
> <extension point="org.eclipse.net4j.util.factories">
> <factory
> productGroup="org.eclipse.net4j.Negotiators"
> type="challenge"
> class="org.eclipse.net4j.util.security.ChallengeNegotiatorFactory"
> />
> </extension>
>
> and:
>
> <extension point="org.eclipse.net4j.util.elementProcessors">
> <elementProcessor class="org.eclipse.net4j.util.security.ChallengeNegotiatorConfigurer"
> />
> </extension>
>
> Do this was forgotten and it is a bug, or is there a specific reason?
>
> Greetings
>
> Heiko
|
|
|
| (no subject) [message #687405 is a reply to message #687129] |
Tue, 07 June 2011 17:36 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Eike
thanks for your answer.
I've looked into the old versions of net4j and CDO inside the svn
repository and since CDO 2.0 there are this combination.
If I do understand right the net4j framework with his IContainer system
and the factories, it is impossible to create a ChallengeNegotiator over
the container method
container.getElement(NegotiatorFactory.PRODUCT_GROUP, type, description);
as there will not used the cdo server plugin.
Greetings
Heiko
Am 02.06.2011 12:56, schrieb Eike Stepper:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> Unfortunately I do not remember excatly why that has been changed. I
> think it was related with the fact that you normally want to provide
> your own implementations. Note that you can easily contribute the
> factories of your choice from your own bundle.
>
> Cheers
> /Eike
>
> ----
> http://www.esc-net.de
> http://thegordian.blogspot.com
> http://twitter.com/eikestepper
>
>
> Am 31.05.2011 00:18, schrieb Heiko Ahlig:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the last days, I tried to understand the NET4J framework, to implement
>> an own protocol.
>>
>> Now I found one point, which I dont understand.
>> There are some factories and element processors, which a implemented
>> inside the org.eclipse.net4j.util plugin.
>>
>> The factory will be registered but now inside the
>> org.eclipse.emf.cdo.server plugin
>>
>> Exactly this are:
>>
>> <extension point="org.eclipse.net4j.util.factories">
>> <factory
>> productGroup="org.eclipse.net4j.Negotiators"
>> type="challenge"
>> class="org.eclipse.net4j.util.security.ChallengeNegotiatorFactory"
>> />
>> </extension>
>>
>> and:
>>
>> <extension point="org.eclipse.net4j.util.elementProcessors">
>> <elementProcessor
>> class="org.eclipse.net4j.util.security.ChallengeNegotiatorConfigurer"
>> />
>> </extension>
>>
>> Do this was forgotten and it is a bug, or is there a specific reason?
>>
>> Greetings
>>
>> Heiko
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.24155 seconds
Home