| [API Tools] Binary compatibility rules ("How to evolve Java APIs") [message #68905] |
Thu, 23 July 2009 08:57  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
Although there is a link to the "Evolving Java-based APIs" document, I
did not find a clear statement that this is "completely" implemented (or
supposed to be).
It would be nice to know if the API Tool team considers deviations as
bugs (or whether there are known deviations)
Kind regards,
Jan
|
|
|
| Re: [API Tools] Binary compatibility rules ("How to evolve Java APIs") [message #69097 is a reply to message #68905] |
Mon, 27 July 2009 05:14  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi again,
ok, maybe my mail was a bit bustling. I do not expect anybody to sign
with blood that the tool adheres to said document. :-)
Though a short statement that this is the general goal (or is not) would
be nice.
Kind regards,
Jan
Jan Lohre schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Although there is a link to the "Evolving Java-based APIs" document, I
> did not find a clear statement that this is "completely" implemented (or
> supposed to be).
> It would be nice to know if the API Tool team considers deviations as
> bugs (or whether there are known deviations)
>
> Kind regards,
> Jan
|
|
|
| Re: [API Tools] Binary compatibility rules ("How to evolve Java APIs") [message #599901 is a reply to message #68905] |
Mon, 27 July 2009 05:14 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi again,
ok, maybe my mail was a bit bustling. I do not expect anybody to sign
with blood that the tool adheres to said document. :-)
Though a short statement that this is the general goal (or is not) would
be nice.
Kind regards,
Jan
Jan Lohre schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Although there is a link to the "Evolving Java-based APIs" document, I
> did not find a clear statement that this is "completely" implemented (or
> supposed to be).
> It would be nice to know if the API Tool team considers deviations as
> bugs (or whether there are known deviations)
>
> Kind regards,
> Jan
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05450 seconds
Home