|
|
|
Re: Some source features are generated without the "Source for " prefix [message #672061 is a reply to message #672043] |
Thu, 19 May 2011 18:14 |
|
Just to make sure. Do both feature.xml files use %featureName?
Do you see any other pattern? Do you have bundles with the same name as the feature? Just wild guessing here as I have
no clue why this happens.
- thomas
On 2011-05-19 18:49, Eike Stepper wrote:
> Am 19.05.2011 15:03, schrieb Thomas Hallgren:
>> Hi Eike,
>>
>> Is the feature name subject to translations in the original feature? What does the feature.properties look like?
> I've attached the two files from the screenshot (2) for you. They look structurally identical and simple.
>
> Cheers
> /Eike
>
> ----
> http://www.esc-net.de
> http://thegordian.blogspot.com
> http://twitter.com/eikestepper
>
>
>>
>> - thomas
>>
>> On 2011-05-19 12:30, Eike Stepper wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I noticed that some of my source features are generated without the "Source for " prefix while others have this prefix.
>>> I've attached two install screenshots that illustrate this problem. When I compare the "good" features with the "bad"
>>> ones I can see no relevant difference. Is there something i could have overseen or could it be a bug in Bucky?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> /Eike
>>>
>>> ----
>>> http://www.esc-net.de
>>> http://thegordian.blogspot.com
>>> http://twitter.com/eikestepper
>>>
>>>
>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03896 seconds