| Newbie: aspectj runtime [message #66763] |
Wed, 09 August 2006 06:43  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: Daniel.Hirscher.innovations.de
Hi,
I played around with ADJT and could get running some examples
and tests. I also tested with AOP in plug-in projects.
Then I realized that I have to add the aspectj runtime
to the manifest.mf as plug-in dependency.
So, why is this needed?
I thought the aspects are woven into the class files.
What does the runtime do?
I would like to use AOP in my plug-in projects but the
dependency to AJDT is not what I want.
Are there other solutions to get the runtime without
a dependency to AJDT? What are the best practices?
Regards,
Daniel
|
|
|
| Re: Newbie: aspectj runtime [message #66866 is a reply to message #66763] |
Wed, 09 August 2006 09:31  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
Yes, aspects are woven into class files, but there will be references to
classes in the runtime library. This needs to be distributed with your
plugins. This is unavoidable, but you don't need a dependency on AJDT,
only on the very small org.aspectj.runtime plugin.
Regards,
Matt.
Daniel Hirscher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I played around with ADJT and could get running some examples
> and tests. I also tested with AOP in plug-in projects.
> Then I realized that I have to add the aspectj runtime
> to the manifest.mf as plug-in dependency.
>
> So, why is this needed?
> I thought the aspects are woven into the class files.
> What does the runtime do?
>
> I would like to use AOP in my plug-in projects but the
> dependency to AJDT is not what I want.
>
> Are there other solutions to get the runtime without
> a dependency to AJDT? What are the best practices?
>
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
|
|
|
| Re: Newbie: aspectj runtime [message #594634 is a reply to message #66763] |
Wed, 09 August 2006 09:31 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
Yes, aspects are woven into class files, but there will be references to
classes in the runtime library. This needs to be distributed with your
plugins. This is unavoidable, but you don't need a dependency on AJDT,
only on the very small org.aspectj.runtime plugin.
Regards,
Matt.
Daniel Hirscher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I played around with ADJT and could get running some examples
> and tests. I also tested with AOP in plug-in projects.
> Then I realized that I have to add the aspectj runtime
> to the manifest.mf as plug-in dependency.
>
> So, why is this needed?
> I thought the aspects are woven into the class files.
> What does the runtime do?
>
> I would like to use AOP in my plug-in projects but the
> dependency to AJDT is not what I want.
>
> Are there other solutions to get the runtime without
> a dependency to AJDT? What are the best practices?
>
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02822 seconds
Home