Eclipse Community Forums: EMF » MinimalEObjectImpl

Help

Home

Home » Modeling » EMF » MinimalEObjectImpl(Difference between EObjectImpl and MinimalEObjectImpl)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

MinimalEObjectImpl [message #641622]

Fri, 26 November 2010 11:17

Ranjith Chungath

Messages: 15
Registered: July 2009

Junior Member

Hi All,

I need to know the difference between using EObjectImpl and MinimalEObjectImpl.

In the GenModel, The "Root Extends Class" property is by default set as EObjectImpl. If I set it to MinimalEObjectImpl, I am getting a considerable Memory improvement.

But, I would like to know the Pros and Cons of the same.
Basically, what are the EMF features that we would loose if we use MinimalEObjectImpl.

Thanks,
Ranjith

Report message to a moderator

Re: MinimalEObjectImpl [message #641631 is a reply to message #641622]

Fri, 26 November 2010 11:46

Eike Stepper

Messages: 6682
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Hi Ranjith,

Ed has blogged about the details: http://ed-merks.blogspot.com/2009/01/emf-ultra-slim-diet.htm l

Cheers
/Eike

----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper

Am 26.11.2010 12:17, schrieb Ranjith Chungath:
> Hi All,
>
> I need to know the difference between using EObjectImpl and MinimalEObjectImpl.
> In the GenModel, The "Root Extends Class" property is by default set as EObjectImpl. If I set it to MinimalEObjectImpl, I am getting a considerable Memory improvement.
>
> But, I would like to know the Pros and Cons of the same.
> Basically, what are the EMF features that we would loose if we use MinimalEObjectImpl.
>
> Thanks,
> Ranjith
>

Cheers
/Eike

----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper

Report message to a moderator