Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Modeling » UML2 » No value in upperValue/lowerValue - meaning?
No value in upperValue/lowerValue - meaning? [message #624056] Wed, 25 July 2007 13:57
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: user.domain.invalid

Dear All,

I am just finishing off my XSLT for the compare tool & wrt
cardinalities/multiplicities I am stuck for some exact wording.

Basically is I run into a change etc in a multiplicity e.g.

<upperValue xmi:type="uml:LiteralUnlimitedNatural"
xmi:id="_WC4sUTqoEdyMeJ3mr5tnmg" value="1"/>

Then I can grab the value attribute & say "value =".

However if the value is the default it is not put in e.g.

<lowerValue xmi:type="uml:LiteralInteger"
xmi:id="_WC4sUDqoEdyMeJ3mr5tnmg"/>

So what would the the "UML correct" wording for when an upper or lower
value has no value?

Default? No Value?


TIA


Adam
Previous Topic:untyped property of a stereotype
Next Topic:untyped property of a stereotype
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Mar 31 23:46:25 GMT 2020

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02655 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top