Can't install VE 1.4 on Galileo 3.5 [message #618361] |
Sun, 07 February 2010 00:03 |
Harrison Curtis Messages: 6 Registered: August 2010 |
Junior Member |
|
|
There are so many conflicts with a fresh install of Eclipse 3.5 Galileo
that I think I have to reconsider using VE. I tried both the online and
offline instructions with the same issues:
Cannot complete the install because of a conflicting dependency.
Software being installed: Java EMF Model
1.4.0.v20090826-1446-7H-FPbAcggQleH8hJifHfUd
(org.eclipse.jem.feature.group 1.4.0.v20090826-1446-7H-FPbAcggQleH8hJifHfUd)
Software currently installed: Eclipse IDE for Java EE Developers
1.2.1.20090918-0703 (epp.package.jee 1.2.1.20090918-0703)
Only one of the following can be installed at once:
Java EMF Model 2.0.300.v200901272200 (org.eclipse.jem
2.0.300.v200901272200)
Java EMF Model 2.0.300.R3_1_maintenance (org.eclipse.jem
2.0.300.R3_1_maintenance)
Cannot satisfy dependency:
From: Eclipse IDE for Java EE Developers 1.2.1.20090918-0703
(epp.package.jee 1.2.1.20090918-0703)
To: org.eclipse.epp.package.jee.feature.feature.group
[1.2.1.20090918-0703]
Cannot satisfy dependency:
From: Java EE IDE Feature 1.2.1.20090918-0703
(org.eclipse.epp.package.jee.feature.feature.group 1.2.1.20090918-0703)
To: org.eclipse.jst.web_ui.feature.feature.group 0.0.0
Cannot satisfy dependency:
From: Java EMF Model 1.4.0.v20090826-1446-7H-FPbAcggQleH8hJifHfUd
(org.eclipse.jem.feature.group 1.4.0.v20090826-1446-7H-FPbAcggQleH8hJifHfUd)
To: org.eclipse.jem [2.0.300.R3_1_maintenance]
Cannot satisfy dependency:
From: JST Web Core 3.1.1.v200908121609-7S7CFyvFIhIehVidwyfk0m
(org.eclipse.jst.web_core.feature.feature.group
3.1.1.v200908121609-7S7CFyvFIhIehVidwyfk0m)
To: org.eclipse.jem [2.0.300.v200901272200]
Cannot satisfy dependency:
From: JST Web UI 3.1.1.v200908121609-7E77FBfDlwYa_9sdy2q77doi14gl
(org.eclipse.jst.web_ui.feature.feature.group
3.1.1.v200908121609-7E77FBfDlwYa_9sdy2q77doi14gl)
To: org.eclipse.jst.web_core.feature.feature.group
[3.1.1.v200908121609-7S7CFyvFIhIehVidwyfk0m]
Can someone suggest what tactic to take?
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02515 seconds