| advice on pure notational models [message #60995] |
Wed, 11 October 2006 16:29  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: vcciubot.uwaterloo.ca
Hi all,
I already have a gmf based model.
What's the best approach of creating alternate views based on information
derived from the model but not necessarily matching structurally the model.
So assuming I have a model of a circuit, a gmf circuit editor, I'd like to
create an eclipse view for the dataflow of the circuit.
(1) Should I use gmf with some dummy emf model for this type of view?
(2) Can I use gmf without a conceptual model?
(2) Should I use gef?
Thanks for your suggestions!
vlad
|
|
|
|
| Re: advice on pure notational models [message #61334 is a reply to message #61239] |
Thu, 12 October 2006 06:18  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: 5d5.mail.ru
Check out org.eclipse.gmf.examples.design2d project; it's a diagram
editor without domain model.
Artem Tikhomirov wrote:
> Generally, GMF is not limited to diagrams "matching structurally the model",
> hence I'd say (1) and (3) are not very correct questions. Answer for (2) is
> "yes".
>
>
> Artem
>
> "Vlad Ciubotariu" <vcciubot@uwaterloo.ca> wrote in message
> news:pan.2006.10.11.20.29.57.720167@uwaterloo.ca...
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I already have a gmf based model.
>>
>> What's the best approach of creating alternate views based on information
>> derived from the model but not necessarily matching structurally the
>> model.
>>
>> So assuming I have a model of a circuit, a gmf circuit editor, I'd like to
>> create an eclipse view for the dataflow of the circuit.
>>
>> (1) Should I use gmf with some dummy emf model for this type of view?
>> (2) Can I use gmf without a conceptual model?
>> (2) Should I use gef?
>>
>> Thanks for your suggestions!
>>
>> vlad
>>
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.06986 seconds
Home