| PDE Manifest editor - classpath utility is kind of confusing [message #59274] |
Wed, 01 February 2006 16:14  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
I created a bundle with the 3.2M4 PDE that included additional jars
(contained within) in its classpath. I added the jars under the manifest
editor's Runtime tab which was easy enough. However, then when I built my
bundle (via the generated Ant script) the compiled code wasn't included.
It took me a while to track down the issue, but I realized that after
adding libraries to my classpath, the root of the bundle was no longer
included. This is fine, and adding "." solved the problem, but the PDE
manifest editor doesn't seem to make this fact very obvious. I had to
click "New" to add a new classpath entry, which presented a dialog box
that appeared to be geared towards adding additional libraries (jars).
E.g., the input box in the dialog is initially filled with "library.jar",
with "library" highlighted so that it can easily be overwritten.
Does this seem unintuitive to anyone else? Is there somewhere else that
allows me to specify that I want the bundle's root included in the
classpath?
Thanks,
Jeremy Volkman
|
|
|
|
| Re: PDE Manifest editor - classpath utility is kind of confusing [message #60526 is a reply to message #59350] |
Thu, 09 February 2006 11:40  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: jeff_nospam_mcaffer.ca.ibm.com
Interesting. Could you enter a bug report against PDE UI with the details
of your workflow.
Thanks!
Jeff
"Peter Neubauer" <pnb@scancoin.se> wrote in message
news:drsd81$2db$1@utils.eclipse.org...
> Jeremy Volkman wrote:
> > Does this seem unintuitive to anyone else? Is there somewhere else that
> > allows me to specify that I want the bundle's root included in the
> > classpath?
> Yes, we have this problem too. We add the "Bundle-Classpath: .," etc in
> the Manifest via the text editor view. it then appears in the runtime
> box, but I don't think there is another way yet. Very confusing when
> running your bundles outside the PDE.
>
> /peter
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05478 seconds
Home