I miss Visual Age for Java.... [message #582204] |
Sun, 15 September 2002 18:24 |
John Messages: 52 Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
I really don't understand the reason for wich IBM doesn't want support
and develope anymore Visual Age for Java. Eclipse is a hybrid between
Visual Age and JBuilder and so I find Eclipse is a worst tool than VAJ. A
lot
of good features like the versioning system, copying the classes, the
layout,
the kind of debugging, the way you run a class etc. have been lost with
Eclipse. We are working "officially" with JBuilder but some of us continue
to use Visual Age, because it is more powerful and "easier" to use then
JBuilder.
Now our tech support intend soon to "officialize" Eclipse, but I and other
people still think that we have really lost a very powerful tool like
Visual Age for Java.
I really hope IBM change its idea, or at least that Eclipse retrieve all
the
good things of Visual Age.
John
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03588 seconds