|
Re: Sybase deployment framework [message #560528 is a reply to message #560520] |
Wed, 09 November 2005 15:23 |
Karl Reti Messages: 4 Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
David,
There are several parts to the connection profile / deployment tools
proposed for STP.
1. The connection profile framework from DTP
2. The datasource navigator in DTP (this can be extended to support
non-database profiles)
3. A deployment framework including package editors and deployment
configuration editors (plus others stuff)
4. Connection profile extensions for the specific containers - celtix,
servicemix etc
1 and 2 are already in DTP and under EPL
3 is being EPL'ed for contribution into STP
4 is to be built in STP
The connection profiles you saw the other week are specific extensions for a
variety of App Servers, these are not currently being planned for
contribution.
Hope this helps
Regards
Karl
"David Bosschaert" <davidb@iona.com> wrote in message
news:dkt1lq$ft3$1@news.eclipse.org...
> After having seen a demo of the Sybase Eclipse functionality, I started
> looking in the Eclipse DTP code, since that already contains pieces of the
> Sybase connectivity functionality.
>
> I can see that the Connection Profile Extension point
> (org.eclipse.datatools.connectivity.connectionProfile) could be the
> basis for the connection mechanism to SOA containers too, something needed
> by the STP SOAN subproject.
> I remember from the Sybase presentation that there was also a SOA
> Container (or appserver) connection profile that
> contained functionality like deploy, pause, start and stop.
>
> Where the basic connectionProfile stuff is already available in DTP, I
> couldn't fint the SOA deploy stuff yet. Is this code available somewhere?
>
> Thanks,
>
> David Bosschaert
> Principal Engineer
> IONA Technologies
|
|
|
Re: Sybase deployment framework [message #560535 is a reply to message #560528] |
Wed, 09 November 2005 15:36 |
David Bosschaert Messages: 29 Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Great! I would be interested 3 as you mention below. Any idea when I can
have a look at that?
Thanks,
David
Karl Reti wrote:
> David,
> There are several parts to the connection profile / deployment tools
> proposed for STP.
>
> 1. The connection profile framework from DTP
> 2. The datasource navigator in DTP (this can be extended to support
> non-database profiles)
> 3. A deployment framework including package editors and deployment
> configuration editors (plus others stuff)
> 4. Connection profile extensions for the specific containers - celtix,
> servicemix etc
>
> 1 and 2 are already in DTP and under EPL
> 3 is being EPL'ed for contribution into STP
> 4 is to be built in STP
>
> The connection profiles you saw the other week are specific extensions for a
> variety of App Servers, these are not currently being planned for
> contribution.
>
> Hope this helps
> Regards
> Karl
>
>
> "David Bosschaert" <davidb@iona.com> wrote in message
> news:dkt1lq$ft3$1@news.eclipse.org...
>
>>After having seen a demo of the Sybase Eclipse functionality, I started
>>looking in the Eclipse DTP code, since that already contains pieces of the
>>Sybase connectivity functionality.
>>
>>I can see that the Connection Profile Extension point
>>(org.eclipse.datatools.connectivity.connectionProfile) could be the
>>basis for the connection mechanism to SOA containers too, something needed
>>by the STP SOAN subproject.
>>I remember from the Sybase presentation that there was also a SOA
>>Container (or appserver) connection profile that
>>contained functionality like deploy, pause, start and stop.
>>
>>Where the basic connectionProfile stuff is already available in DTP, I
>>couldn't fint the SOA deploy stuff yet. Is this code available somewhere?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>David Bosschaert
>>Principal Engineer
>>IONA Technologies
>
>
>
|
|
|
Re: Sybase deployment framework [message #560557 is a reply to message #560535] |
Wed, 09 November 2005 17:28 |
Karl Reti Messages: 4 Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
We are working on that now, as soon as I have a date I will let you know..
Karl
"David Bosschaert" <davidb@iona.com> wrote in message
news:dkt4v4$ksf$1@news.eclipse.org...
> Great! I would be interested 3 as you mention below. Any idea when I can
> have a look at that?
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
> Karl Reti wrote:
>> David,
>> There are several parts to the connection profile / deployment tools
>> proposed for STP.
>>
>> 1. The connection profile framework from DTP
>> 2. The datasource navigator in DTP (this can be extended to support
>> non-database profiles)
>> 3. A deployment framework including package editors and deployment
>> configuration editors (plus others stuff)
>> 4. Connection profile extensions for the specific containers - celtix,
>> servicemix etc
>>
>> 1 and 2 are already in DTP and under EPL
>> 3 is being EPL'ed for contribution into STP
>> 4 is to be built in STP
>>
>> The connection profiles you saw the other week are specific extensions
>> for a variety of App Servers, these are not currently being planned for
>> contribution.
>>
>> Hope this helps
>> Regards
>> Karl
>>
>>
>> "David Bosschaert" <davidb@iona.com> wrote in message
>> news:dkt1lq$ft3$1@news.eclipse.org...
>>
>>>After having seen a demo of the Sybase Eclipse functionality, I started
>>>looking in the Eclipse DTP code, since that already contains pieces of
>>>the Sybase connectivity functionality.
>>>
>>>I can see that the Connection Profile Extension point
>>>(org.eclipse.datatools.connectivity.connectionProfile) could be the
>>>basis for the connection mechanism to SOA containers too, something
>>>needed by the STP SOAN subproject.
>>>I remember from the Sybase presentation that there was also a SOA
>>>Container (or appserver) connection profile that
>>>contained functionality like deploy, pause, start and stop.
>>>
>>>Where the basic connectionProfile stuff is already available in DTP, I
>>>couldn't fint the SOA deploy stuff yet. Is this code available somewhere?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>David Bosschaert
>>>Principal Engineer
>>>IONA Technologies
>>
>>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03519 seconds