|
|
Re: File attachments [message #625311 is a reply to message #560139] |
Wed, 22 September 2010 08:19 |
BasicGuy Messages: 5 Registered: September 2010 |
Junior Member |
|
|
Thanks for your reply.
Tom Seidel wrote on Tue, 21 September 2010 06:30 |
One question: Do you think it also makes sense to provide an information type where several files can be attached, to group many files within one information unit?
|
Well, if you make a type which is a dynamic (you can add or remove) collection of attachments, that would be great.
Actually you already have this concept implemented in the email type. So, maybe you could make this generic in a way that some of the other basic types (txt, rich text, source code, task, etc) would accept attachments. If you have a group of attachments, you would anyway want to be able to describe the group. That description may as well be in the txt, rich text, etc. type. In any case a simple group of attachments with a plain text description would be excellent.
Quote: |
You cannot view the content of this file in Remus, we'll just provide a link, which opens the file with the default system-application
|
I hope that with "link" you mean a link to a file which has been copied to the repository, and not a link to where ever the file may be on disk. Non-embedded attachments quite often get obsolete over time (like URLs).
[Updated on: Wed, 22 September 2010 08:26] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: File attachments [message #628700 is a reply to message #625311] |
Thu, 23 September 2010 17:43 |
Tom Seidel Messages: 91 Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
BasicGuy wrote on Wed, 22 September 2010 04:19 |
Well, if you make a type which is a dynamic (you can add or remove) collection of attachments, that would be great.
Actually you already have this concept implemented in the email type. So, maybe you could make this generic in a way that some of the other basic types (txt, rich text, source code, task, etc) would accept attachments. If you have a group of attachments, you would anyway want to be able to describe the group. That description may as well be in the txt, rich text, etc. type. In any case a simple group of attachments with a plain text description would be excellent.
|
Ok, filed
BasicGuy wrote on Wed, 22 September 2010 04:19 |
I hope that with "link" you mean a link to a file which has been copied to the repository, and not a link to where ever the file may be on disk. Non-embedded attachments quite often get obsolete over time (like URLs).
|
Of course. The information unit embedds the file also "physically".
Cheerz,
Tom
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03370 seconds