| Week Interval - Bug or Feature? [message #55343] |
Fri, 08 July 2005 14:28  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: none.none.none
Creating a group with a 1 week interval, I expected it to be based on 'true'
weeks rather based on arbitrary start points.
For example, the user inputs a start date and an end date for the report...
--If the user puts in 6/10/05-7/10/05, then BIRT will group weeks as
6/10/05,6/17/05,6/24/05
I'm using 1.01 M1
|
|
|
| Re: Week Interval - Bug or Feature? [message #55371 is a reply to message #55343] |
Fri, 08 July 2005 14:37  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: none.none.none
Oops... accidentally sent that before it was done. So here it is again...
Creating a group with a 1 week interval, I expected it to be based on 'true'
weeks rather than arbitrary start points.
For example, the user inputs a start date and an end date for the report...
--If the user puts in 6/10/05-7/1/05, then BIRT will group weeks as
6/10/05,6/17/05,6/24/05...
--If the user puts in 6/11/05-7/1/05, then BIRT will group weeks as
6/11/05,6/18/05,6/25/05...
So in other words, BIRT seems to simply take the start date and increment it
by 7 days... regardless what day of the week they fall on.
However, it does seem to work as I would expect for the month interval.
It'll group on month beginnings where it can.
I'm using 1.01 M1
So is this a bug, or is it intentional?
"chris" <none@none.none> wrote in message
news:damgjt$bug$1@news.eclipse.org...
> Creating a group with a 1 week interval, I expected it to be based on
> 'true' weeks rather based on arbitrary start points.
> For example, the user inputs a start date and an end date for the
> report...
>
> --If the user puts in 6/10/05-7/10/05, then BIRT will group weeks as
> 6/10/05,6/17/05,6/24/05
>
>
> I'm using 1.01 M1
>
|
|
|
| Re: Week Interval - Bug or Feature? [message #55693 is a reply to message #55371] |
Sun, 10 July 2005 03:35 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Chris
Could you log a bugzilla entry on the behavior you expect? Group by
"week" and group by 7days on a date fields should be handled differently, I
think what you see is a bug for grouping by "week".
Wenfeng
"chris" <none@none.none> wrote in message
news:damh59$cjf$1@news.eclipse.org...
> Oops... accidentally sent that before it was done. So here it is again...
>
> Creating a group with a 1 week interval, I expected it to be based on
> 'true' weeks rather than arbitrary start points.
> For example, the user inputs a start date and an end date for the
> report...
>
> --If the user puts in 6/10/05-7/1/05, then BIRT will group weeks as
> 6/10/05,6/17/05,6/24/05...
> --If the user puts in 6/11/05-7/1/05, then BIRT will group weeks as
> 6/11/05,6/18/05,6/25/05...
>
> So in other words, BIRT seems to simply take the start date and increment
> it by 7 days... regardless what day of the week they fall on.
> However, it does seem to work as I would expect for the month interval.
> It'll group on month beginnings where it can.
>
> I'm using 1.01 M1
>
> So is this a bug, or is it intentional?
>
>
> "chris" <none@none.none> wrote in message
> news:damgjt$bug$1@news.eclipse.org...
>> Creating a group with a 1 week interval, I expected it to be based on
>> 'true' weeks rather based on arbitrary start points.
>> For example, the user inputs a start date and an end date for the
>> report...
>>
>> --If the user puts in 6/10/05-7/10/05, then BIRT will group weeks as
>> 6/10/05,6/17/05,6/24/05
>>
>>
>> I'm using 1.01 M1
>>
>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02918 seconds
Home