| Repository install for use only with Mylyn [message #55318] | 
Wed, 06 August 2008 14:45   | 
 
Eclipse User  | 
 | 
 | 
   | 
 
Originally posted by: gary.pinkham.kronos.com 
 
I was curious if anyone has any suggestions on picking a repository for  
use only with Mylyn.     My employer has an issue tracker (DevTrack) and  
scm(Accurev) which do not work with Mylyn (nor do I really want to spend  
the effort to make them work with Mylyn)   So I was thinking of setting up  
a repository for my team (9 people) to use.   Since I don't need the  
"other" features of Bugzilla or Trac or xPlanner etc..  I wanted to hear  
from the community which one best supports Mylyn (and hopefully is the  
easiest to get running)..    
 
Thanks 
Gary
 |  
 |  
  | 
| Re: Repository install for use only with Mylyn [message #55476 is a reply to message #55318] | 
Thu, 07 August 2008 08:13   | 
 
Eclipse User  | 
 | 
 | 
   | 
 
Hi Gary, 
 
just some thoughts... 
 
1. Did you consider to use/add an HTTP wrapper around this issue tracker and use the generic web 
connector? It could be as easy as an CGI script and return text (not HTML) for easier parsing. 
In this way, you would stay connected to your standard issue tracker. 
 
2. Bugzilla is the reference implementation for Mylyn. But I guess Bugzilla is difficult to setup 
and has a wealth of configurations... But these are my personal feelings since I never set up a 
Bugzilla repository. 
 
3. Trac is very nice IHMO, and the Mylyn support should be good (Steffen did it as I remember). So I 
would go that way otherwise. 
 
4. xPlanner seems to be a bit more difficult to set up and I had the impression that it is not 
actively developed any longer... But if you want to do agile / extreme programming, this could be 
the best choice. 
 
Cheers, Jörg 
 
On 08/06/08 20:45, Gary Pinkhkam wrote: 
> I was curious if anyone has any suggestions on picking a repository for 
> use only with Mylyn.     My employer has an issue tracker (DevTrack) and 
> scm(Accurev) which do not work with Mylyn (nor do I really want to spend 
> the effort to make them work with Mylyn)   So I was thinking of setting 
> up a repository for my team (9 people) to use.   Since I don't need the 
> "other" features of Bugzilla or Trac or xPlanner etc..  I wanted to hear 
> from the community which one best supports Mylyn (and hopefully is the 
> easiest to get running)..   
> Thanks 
> Gary 
>
 |  
 |  
  | 
| Re: Repository install for use only with Mylyn [message #592260 is a reply to message #55318] | 
Thu, 07 August 2008 08:13   | 
 
Eclipse User  | 
 | 
 | 
   | 
 
Hi Gary, 
 
just some thoughts... 
 
1. Did you consider to use/add an HTTP wrapper around this issue tracker and use the generic web 
connector? It could be as easy as an CGI script and return text (not HTML) for easier parsing. 
In this way, you would stay connected to your standard issue tracker. 
 
2. Bugzilla is the reference implementation for Mylyn. But I guess Bugzilla is difficult to setup 
and has a wealth of configurations... But these are my personal feelings since I never set up a 
Bugzilla repository. 
 
3. Trac is very nice IHMO, and the Mylyn support should be good (Steffen did it as I remember). So I 
would go that way otherwise. 
 
4. xPlanner seems to be a bit more difficult to set up and I had the impression that it is not 
actively developed any longer... But if you want to do agile / extreme programming, this could be 
the best choice. 
 
Cheers, Jörg 
 
On 08/06/08 20:45, Gary Pinkhkam wrote: 
> I was curious if anyone has any suggestions on picking a repository for 
> use only with Mylyn.     My employer has an issue tracker (DevTrack) and 
> scm(Accurev) which do not work with Mylyn (nor do I really want to spend 
> the effort to make them work with Mylyn)   So I was thinking of setting 
> up a repository for my team (9 people) to use.   Since I don't need the 
> "other" features of Bugzilla or Trac or xPlanner etc..  I wanted to hear 
> from the community which one best supports Mylyn (and hopefully is the 
> easiest to get running)..   
> Thanks 
> Gary 
>
 |  
 |  
  | 
Powered by 
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.26485 seconds