Skip to main content



      Home
Home » Language IDEs » Java Development Tools (JDT) » Differences in launchers for 3.4 and 3.5?
Differences in launchers for 3.4 and 3.5? [message #517748] Mon, 01 March 2010 17:23 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
We have some developers who have recently upgraded to 3.5.1 IDE from 3.4, while the majority of our development team continues with 3.4.

One immediate issue that we've noticed is that the Eclispe launchers created in 3.5 are not properly read by the 3.4 IDE. Specifically, on the "plugins" tab, all plugins are shown as unselected in 3.4, while the same launcher file opened in 3.5 shows a proeprly populated list of plugins.

I've inspected the launch files created in both 3.4 and 3.5, and they appear nearly identical to me, with reagrd to the selected workspace plugins. Is there any known issue with using a 3.5 launcher file in a 3.4 workspace, or alternatively, is there any reason to expect that this either should or should not work.

Thanks,
Don
Re: Differences in launchers for 3.4 and 3.5? [message #517826 is a reply to message #517748] Tue, 02 March 2010 04:41 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
Don P wrote:
> We have some developers who have recently upgraded to 3.5.1 IDE from
> 3.4, while the majority of our development team continues with 3.4.
>
> One immediate issue that we've noticed is that the Eclispe launchers
> created in 3.5 are not properly read by the 3.4 IDE. Specifically, on
> the "plugins" tab, all plugins are shown as unselected in 3.4, while
> the same launcher file opened in 3.5 shows a proeprly populated list
> of plugins.
>
> I've inspected the launch files created in both 3.4 and 3.5, and they
> appear nearly identical to me, with reagrd to the selected workspace
> plugins. Is there any known issue with using a 3.5 launcher file in a
> 3.4 workspace,
Can't comment on the particular case but compatibility is only provided
from 3.4 to 3.5 and not backwards i.e. if a project uses 3.5 stuff then
this is not supported to work with 3.4.

Dani
> or alternatively, is there any reason to expect that this either
> should or should not work.
>
> Thanks,
> Don
Previous Topic:Problem with generated java files from annotation processor
Next Topic:Continuosly window limits paints when resizing
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Mar 27 17:14:59 EDT 2025

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.02503 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top