Eclipse Community Forums: EGit / JGit

Help

Home

Home » Eclipse Projects » EGit / JGit » Egit and OSX 10.6.2

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Egit and OSX 10.6.2 [message #513408]

Wed, 10 February 2010 04:48

Matthew

Messages: 6
Registered: February 2010

Junior Member

I was wondering if anyone using OSX has been able to import a git repository.

I have tried the latest plugins as well as plugins dating back into 2009. All of them fail to import any repositories. I am however able to successfully import a repository both on my Linux box and my Windows one.

The error I get is: Couldn't create temporary repository.

This message comes up immediately after inputting the repository uri and clicking next. (It appears on the top of the Select a branch screen) It doesn't seem at all like it even attempts to hit the repository, the error appears immediately regardless of what repository uri I put in on the previous screen.

I was just wondering if anyone else had experienced this, and if anyone knows of a solution.

I would even appreciate it if someone could point me in the right direction of just finding out more information as to where exactly this error is occurring, is there a way to enable egit/jgit logging?

Anyways thanks for your time,

~Matthew

P.S. I am running Galileo, I have tried both the 64bit and 32 bit builds. I am running Snow Leopard in 64bit mode.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Egit and OSX 10.6.2 [message #513449 is a reply to message #513408]

Wed, 10 February 2010 09:34

Matthias Sohn

Messages: 1072
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Which EGit version are you using ?

Report message to a moderator

Re: Egit and OSX 10.6.2 [message #513564 is a reply to message #513408]

Wed, 10 February 2010 15:18

Matthew

Messages: 6
Registered: February 2010

Junior Member

I have tried the most recent (non-nightly):

Eclipse EGit Feature (Incubation) 0.6.0.201001271947
Eclipse JGit Feature (Incubation) 0.6.0.201001271946

I have also tried some older versions, but they all have the same result. The above version is the one I am mainly trying though.

Thanks

Report message to a moderator