Eclipse Community Forums: ServerTools (WTP)

Home » Language IDEs » ServerTools (WTP) » 3.1M2 and 1.0M1

Thu, 04 November 2004 11:28

Eclipse User

Should I expect WTP 1.0M1 to work with Eclipse 3.1M2. I notice that M2 is
planned to work with 3.1M4, but I couldn't find any reference to 3.1 in M1's
description.

Thanks,

Russell

Re: 3.1M2 and 1.0M1 [message #51886 is a reply to message #51831]

Thu, 04 November 2004 11:57

Eclipse User

Russell Gonsalves wrote:
> Should I expect WTP 1.0M1 to work with Eclipse 3.1M2. I notice that M2 is
> planned to work with 3.1M4, but I couldn't find any reference to 3.1 in M1's
> description.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Russell
>
>
Nope. Here is info from FAQ

'Web Tools Project Milestone one release doesn't work with the latest
Eclipse 3.1 milestones. This path was chosen to provide a new release as
quick as possible. All future release will be based on Eclipse 3.1
milestones.'

Re: 3.1M2 and 1.0M1 [message #51909 is a reply to message #51886]

Thu, 04 November 2004 12:32

Eclipse User

Thanks, Jeff.

Anyone know if the latest integration build (I20041015) works with 3.1M2?

Thanks,

Russell

"Jeff Duska" <Jeff.Duska@noaa.gov> wrote in message
news:cmdn0f$7sc$1@eclipse.org...
> Russell Gonsalves wrote:
> > Should I expect WTP 1.0M1 to work with Eclipse 3.1M2. I notice that M2
is
> > planned to work with 3.1M4, but I couldn't find any reference to 3.1 in
M1's
> > description.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Russell
> >
> >
> Nope. Here is info from FAQ
>
> 'Web Tools Project Milestone one release doesn't work with the latest
> Eclipse 3.1 milestones. This path was chosen to provide a new release as
> quick as possible. All future release will be based on Eclipse 3.1
> milestones.'

Re: 3.1M2 and 1.0M1 [message #52091 is a reply to message #51909]

Fri, 05 November 2004 15:28

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: daagar.gmail.com

Russell Gonsalves wrote:

> Thanks, Jeff.

> Anyone know if the latest integration build (I20041015) works with 3.1M2?

> Thanks,

> Russell

No promises, but I just successfully ran WTP I20041101 with 3.1M3.
*swoon*

Re: 3.1M2 and 1.0M1 [message #52114 is a reply to message #52091]

Fri, 05 November 2004 16:10

Eclipse User

Thanks for the info. That should be an N20041101 (not I20041101) :-(.
Curious as to when (before 1.0M2 works with 3.1M4) to expect the "I" level
to work with 3.1 (now M3)?

Russell

"daagar" <daagar@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cmgnpr$pap$1@eclipse.org...
> Russell Gonsalves wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Jeff.
>
> > Anyone know if the latest integration build (I20041015) works with
3.1M2?
>
> > Thanks,
>
> > Russell
>
>
> No promises, but I just successfully ran WTP I20041101 with 3.1M3.
> *swoon*
>

Re: 3.1M2 and 1.0M1 [message #53010 is a reply to message #52114]

Wed, 10 November 2004 02:19

Eclipse User

Hi everybody,
before shooting on the pianist (opening bugs:), can someone from official
source confirm or deny if N20041101 can work in 3.1M3? (i do mean M3 not
M2)
I find it is highly unstable and if i try to define a server a LOT of
weird things happens, included the fact that eclipse won't stop anymore
unless i kill it from the task manager.
Regards, Gabriele.

Russell Gonsalves wrote:

> Thanks for the info. That should be an N20041101 (not I20041101) :-(.
> Curious as to when (before 1.0M2 works with 3.1M4) to expect the "I" level
> to work with 3.1 (now M3)?

> Russell

> "daagar" <daagar@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:cmgnpr$pap$1@eclipse.org...
>> Russell Gonsalves wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks, Jeff.
>>
>> > Anyone know if the latest integration build (I20041015) works with
> 3.1M2?
>>
>> > Thanks,
>>
>> > Russell
>>
>>
>> No promises, but I just successfully ran WTP I20041101 with 3.1M3.
>> *swoon*
>>

Re: 3.1M2 and 1.0M1 [message #53166 is a reply to message #51886]

Thu, 11 November 2004 12:14

Eclipse User

Originally posted by: nick_edgar._no.spam.please_.ca.ibm.com

I'd be curious to know where the incompatibilities are. Eclipse 3.1 is
supposed to be backwards compatible with 3.0/3.0.1, and I'm not aware of any
major breaking API changes yet. Is it that Web Tools is using Eclipse
internals which are under flux, or are there breaking changes in Eclipse 3.1
that we're not aware of?

Nick

"Jeff Duska" <Jeff.Duska@noaa.gov> wrote in message
news:cmdn0f$7sc$1@eclipse.org...
> Russell Gonsalves wrote:
> > Should I expect WTP 1.0M1 to work with Eclipse 3.1M2. I notice that M2
is
> > planned to work with 3.1M4, but I couldn't find any reference to 3.1 in
M1's
> > description.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Russell
> >
> >
> Nope. Here is info from FAQ
>
> 'Web Tools Project Milestone one release doesn't work with the latest
> Eclipse 3.1 milestones. This path was chosen to provide a new release as
> quick as possible. All future release will be based on Eclipse 3.1
> milestones.'

Re: 3.1M2 and 1.0M1 [message #53220 is a reply to message #53166]

Thu, 11 November 2004 16:20

Eclipse User

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:14:11 -0500, Nick Edgar <nick_edgar@_no.spam.please_.ca.ibm.com> wrote:

> I'd be curious to know where the incompatibilities are. Eclipse 3.1 is
> supposed to be backwards compatible with 3.0/3.0.1, and I'm not aware of any
> major breaking API changes yet. Is it that Web Tools is using Eclipse
> internals which are under flux, or are there breaking changes in Eclipse 3.1
> that we're not aware of?
>

No breaking changes. For our WTP M1 I think part of the issue was specifing
explicit "match" statements in "requires" tags.

As we move forward, we in WTP have made some use of internal methods/classes, we
have feature requests for all the cases which we do not think we can
solve without some change in the base. (And, in fact, Eclipse M3 "bit" one such
use ... but is/was easy for us to fix temporarily).

Previous Topic:	Pollinate Status and Meeting Agenda 2004-11-11
Next Topic:	Installing Web Standard Tools

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Thu May 08 07:19:31 EDT 2025

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Breadcrumbs

Sign up to our Newsletter