Only few elements are displayed from generated model [message #512344] |
Thu, 04 February 2010 12:18  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi all,
there is a strange behavior of my GMF diagram. When i'm drawing a new
model started from the "New Diagram..." wizard all elements are
displayed properly in the model, even if i initializ a new one and
reopen them.
BUT: I've a workflow implemented that generates the model. However, when
i try to initialize a diagram from the generated model, only few
elements are displayed, some are ignored. When i add nodes from the same
type by using the palette into the diagram, that hides some generated
nodes, these additional nodes are displayed without any problems after
reopening or initializing the diagram.
I really don't know why this happens. Unfortunately, there is no
expection in the log.
I need help!!!!
Thanks in advance Timothy
|
|
|
Re: Only few elements are displayed from generated model [message #512495 is a reply to message #512344] |
Fri, 05 February 2010 05:06  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Okay, i have narrowed the problem to some degree, since i found out,
that the diagram internal model creates no links to the domain model for
some elements? I don'T know why, because when i create the same nodes
with the diagram the mapping is correct???
Timothy Marc schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> there is a strange behavior of my GMF diagram. When i'm drawing a new
> model started from the "New Diagram..." wizard all elements are
> displayed properly in the model, even if i initializ a new one and
> reopen them.
>
> BUT: I've a workflow implemented that generates the model. However, when
> i try to initialize a diagram from the generated model, only few
> elements are displayed, some are ignored. When i add nodes from the same
> type by using the palette into the diagram, that hides some generated
> nodes, these additional nodes are displayed without any problems after
> reopening or initializing the diagram.
> I really don't know why this happens. Unfortunately, there is no
> expection in the log.
>
> I need help!!!!
> Thanks in advance Timothy
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04341 seconds