| Errors in Xtext Grammar File [message #50944] |
Sat, 13 June 2009 16:04  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: oba.informatik.uni-kiel.de
Hi,
in the grammar editor of Xtext, some obvious errors are not shown.
Additionally, some errors are shown sometimes but not shown after a few
minutes although they are not fixed yet.
I have seen that there was a bug report regarding this issue:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=203671
Unfortunately, I can't deduce anything from that reports... What is the
current status? Will this bug in the editor be fixed soon?
What would I need to do and where would I need to start if I wanted to
fix it myself?
Example:
Rule :
Rule1 | Rule2
;
Rule 1:
lala=ID
;
Rule 1:
lala=ID
;
There are at least two bugs in the grammer above. These errors are
sometimes shown sometimes not..
Thanks
Inanc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Errors in Xtext Grammar File [message #51165 is a reply to message #51112] |
Sun, 14 June 2009 10:33  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi myname,
I'm afraid you cannot use Xtext with Ganymede as we depend on EMF 2.5
which in turn requires Eclipse 3.5 Galileo.
The only way to overcome this is to compile EMF and Xtext yourself which
will propably no valid option for you.
Regards,
Sebastian
Am 14.06.2009 16:20 Uhr, schrieb myName:
> Sven Efftinge wrote:
>> So the answer is, yes, it has been fixed in TMF Xtext. :-)
>
> Thanks for your answer, Sven.
>
> Well, the thing is: In the getting started documentation of TMF Xtext,
> it says, that TMF Xtext needs Eclipse Galileo.
>
> I am working on a project where we develop in Eclipse Ganymede. Can you
> say anything about that?
> - How compatible is TMF Xtext in Eclipse Ganymede? Do I "loose" any
> features or so?
>
> Thanks
|
|
|
| Re: Errors in Xtext Grammar File [message #51218 is a reply to message #51138] |
Sun, 14 June 2009 11:01 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: oba.informatik.uni-kiel.de
Sven Efftinge wrote:
> It won't work, because the OSGi bundles explicitly require eclipse
> galileo bundles (via version ranges).
oh, thanks.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04612 seconds
Home