Home » Archived » Buckminster » Any experience using buckminster and AspectJ?
|
| Re: Any experience using buckminster and AspectJ? [message #502622 is a reply to message #502616] |
Wed, 09 December 2009 08:07   |
|
Hi Alain,
The general rule of thumb when using Buckminster is that if you can build it in your IDE, you should be able to build
the same thing headlessly. Your workspace is built the same way regardless. Are you encountering any specific problems?
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
On 2009-12-09 08:43, Alain Helfenstein wrote:
> Hi
>
> Does anyone have some experience using buckminster to build projects
> that use AspectJ?
>
> I read about this bug
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=252641 that explains a
> possible workaround for headless pde builds.
>
> But did this also works for buckminster?
>
> Thanks for any response,
> Alain.
|
|
|
| Re: Any experience using buckminster and AspectJ? [message #502635 is a reply to message #502622] |
Wed, 09 December 2009 08:54 |
 Alain 
Messages: 115
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Thomas,
thanks a lot for your answer.
In the IDE, I have installed the AJDT feature that exports a builder for
the projects that uses AspectJ.
In the .project file we have now the following lines that replaces the
"org.eclipse.jdt.core.javabuilder" buildCommand:
<buildCommand>
<name>org.eclipse.ajdt.core.ajbuilder</name>
<arguments>
</arguments>
</buildCommand>
But for the headless buckminster build, a headless ajbuilder is missing.
There is a workaround for headless pde build. But I'm not shure if I can
use the same workaround for the buckminster build.
The steps to follow in order to implement the workaround are as follows
(see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=252641):
1. unzip the plugin into your eclipse/dropins directory.
2. run eclipse once so that this plugin is recognized and installed by
the P2
installer
3. in your headless build script, make sure that the eclipse antrunner
points
to the org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build/scripts/build.xml ant script
4. ensure that the following property is available to ant:
ajdt.pdebuild.home =
<path_to_ajdt.pde_plugin> (you can add this as a vm arg to
-Dajdt.pdebuild.home=<path_to_ajdt.pde_plugin>)
5. run your build script
How to implement the point 3 if I want to use buckminster?
So my question was, if anybody have already solved this issue.
Kind regards,
Alain.
Thomas Hallgren schrieb:
> Hi Alain,
> The general rule of thumb when using Buckminster is that if you can
> build it in your IDE, you should be able to build the same thing
> headlessly. Your workspace is built the same way regardless. Are you
> encountering any specific problems?
>
> Regards,
> Thomas Hallgren
>
>
> On 2009-12-09 08:43, Alain Helfenstein wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Does anyone have some experience using buckminster to build projects
>> that use AspectJ?
>>
>> I read about this bug
>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=252641 that explains a
>> possible workaround for headless pde builds.
>>
>> But did this also works for buckminster?
>>
>> Thanks for any response,
>> Alain.
>
|
|
|
| Re: Any experience using buckminster and AspectJ? [message #502641 is a reply to message #502635] |
Wed, 09 December 2009 09:22 |
|
Hi Alain,
I'm trying to understand why you would need a workaround in the first place. When using Buckminster, you won't run into
any limitations that might exist when you run a PDE build headlessly.
So if you have your build running in your IDE, perhaps you should just try and run it headlessly with Buckminster and
see if it works. If it doesn't, then we can take it from there.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
|
|
|
| Re: Any experience using buckminster and AspectJ? [message #502765 is a reply to message #502641] |
Wed, 09 December 2009 16:15 |
Alain
Messages: 115
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Thomas
Thanks for your answer.
As far as I see the problem is as follows:
1. I can't install the original AJDT plugin (that i use in my IDE) into
a hedless environment, because if I do so, a exception will be thrown,
that the SWTException class is missing.
2. Instead of that, I install the "org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build" plugin
that, do to the description, supports the build of aspectj plugins
headlessly.
3. Because the projects (using aspectj) does not have a
org.eclipse.jdt.core.javabuilder build-command no classes will be built
using a default headless installation (whitout
org.eclipse.jdt.core.javabuilder).
As effect, simply the class can not be found e.g. "NameProvider cannot
be resolved"
4. That the plugin org.eclipse.jdt.core.javabuilder takes effect, the
documentation sais, that I should make shure, that the eclipse antrunner
points to the org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build/scripts/build.xml ant script.
And now the question: How to do this for buckminster?
Thanks for your response,
Alain.
|
|
|
| Re: Any experience using buckminster and AspectJ? [message #502796 is a reply to message #502765] |
Wed, 09 December 2009 17:39 |
|
Hi Alain,
Please install the org.eclipse.buckminster.pde.headless.feature into your headless buckminster. It contains the javabuilder.
I don't know what the build.xml in question does, or where it's supposed to get called from, so I cannot advice on #4.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
On 2009-12-09 17:15, Alain Helfenstein wrote:
> Hi Thomas
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> As far as I see the problem is as follows:
>
> 1. I can't install the original AJDT plugin (that i use in my IDE) into
> a hedless environment, because if I do so, a exception will be thrown,
> that the SWTException class is missing.
>
> 2. Instead of that, I install the "org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build" plugin
> that, do to the description, supports the build of aspectj plugins
> headlessly.
>
> 3. Because the projects (using aspectj) does not have a
> org.eclipse.jdt.core.javabuilder build-command no classes will be built
> using a default headless installation (whitout
> org.eclipse.jdt.core.javabuilder).
> As effect, simply the class can not be found e.g. "NameProvider cannot
> be resolved"
>
> 4. That the plugin org.eclipse.jdt.core.javabuilder takes effect, the
> documentation sais, that I should make shure, that the eclipse antrunner
> points to the org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build/scripts/build.xml ant script.
>
> And now the question: How to do this for buckminster?
>
> Thanks for your response,
> Alain.
|
|
| |
| Re: Any experience using buckminster and AspectJ? [message #502981 is a reply to message #502969] |
Thu, 10 December 2009 14:08 |
|
On 2009-12-10 14:33, Alain Helfenstein wrote:
> Hi Thomas
>
> I give it another try.
>
> The documentation of the headless AJDT (AspectJ) sais, that you should
> install the org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build plugin into your headless pde
> build environment.
>
> Then you should change the main entry point of the eclipse ant runner to
> the org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build/scripts/build.xml script instead of the
> org.eclipse.pde.build/scripts/build.xml
>
> But is it right, that buckminster does not call the
> org.eclipse.pde.build/scripts/build.xml?
>
That's right. Buckminster will not call that. We just build as you normally would build when you have the workspace in
the IDE. No special tricks are used in a headless environment.
- thomas
|
|
| |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Apr 19 22:35:02 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03440 seconds |
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
