|
|
| Re: Any experience using buckminster and AspectJ? [message #502635 is a reply to message #502622] |
Wed, 09 December 2009 03:54   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Thomas,
thanks a lot for your answer.
In the IDE, I have installed the AJDT feature that exports a builder for
the projects that uses AspectJ.
In the .project file we have now the following lines that replaces the
"org.eclipse.jdt.core.javabuilder" buildCommand:
<buildCommand>
<name>org.eclipse.ajdt.core.ajbuilder</name>
<arguments>
</arguments>
</buildCommand>
But for the headless buckminster build, a headless ajbuilder is missing.
There is a workaround for headless pde build. But I'm not shure if I can
use the same workaround for the buckminster build.
The steps to follow in order to implement the workaround are as follows
(see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=252641):
1. unzip the plugin into your eclipse/dropins directory.
2. run eclipse once so that this plugin is recognized and installed by
the P2
installer
3. in your headless build script, make sure that the eclipse antrunner
points
to the org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build/scripts/build.xml ant script
4. ensure that the following property is available to ant:
ajdt.pdebuild.home =
<path_to_ajdt.pde_plugin> (you can add this as a vm arg to
-Dajdt.pdebuild.home=<path_to_ajdt.pde_plugin>)
5. run your build script
How to implement the point 3 if I want to use buckminster?
So my question was, if anybody have already solved this issue.
Kind regards,
Alain.
Thomas Hallgren schrieb:
> Hi Alain,
> The general rule of thumb when using Buckminster is that if you can
> build it in your IDE, you should be able to build the same thing
> headlessly. Your workspace is built the same way regardless. Are you
> encountering any specific problems?
>
> Regards,
> Thomas Hallgren
>
>
> On 2009-12-09 08:43, Alain Helfenstein wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Does anyone have some experience using buckminster to build projects
>> that use AspectJ?
>>
>> I read about this bug
>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=252641 that explains a
>> possible workaround for headless pde builds.
>>
>> But did this also works for buckminster?
>>
>> Thanks for any response,
>> Alain.
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any experience using buckminster and AspectJ? [message #502765 is a reply to message #502641] |
Wed, 09 December 2009 11:15 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Thomas
Thanks for your answer.
As far as I see the problem is as follows:
1. I can't install the original AJDT plugin (that i use in my IDE) into
a hedless environment, because if I do so, a exception will be thrown,
that the SWTException class is missing.
2. Instead of that, I install the "org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build" plugin
that, do to the description, supports the build of aspectj plugins
headlessly.
3. Because the projects (using aspectj) does not have a
org.eclipse.jdt.core.javabuilder build-command no classes will be built
using a default headless installation (whitout
org.eclipse.jdt.core.javabuilder).
As effect, simply the class can not be found e.g. "NameProvider cannot
be resolved"
4. That the plugin org.eclipse.jdt.core.javabuilder takes effect, the
documentation sais, that I should make shure, that the eclipse antrunner
points to the org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build/scripts/build.xml ant script.
And now the question: How to do this for buckminster?
Thanks for your response,
Alain.
|
|
|
| Re: Any experience using buckminster and AspectJ? [message #502796 is a reply to message #502765] |
Wed, 09 December 2009 12:39 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Alain,
Please install the org.eclipse.buckminster.pde.headless.feature into your headless buckminster. It contains the javabuilder.
I don't know what the build.xml in question does, or where it's supposed to get called from, so I cannot advice on #4.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
On 2009-12-09 17:15, Alain Helfenstein wrote:
> Hi Thomas
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> As far as I see the problem is as follows:
>
> 1. I can't install the original AJDT plugin (that i use in my IDE) into
> a hedless environment, because if I do so, a exception will be thrown,
> that the SWTException class is missing.
>
> 2. Instead of that, I install the "org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build" plugin
> that, do to the description, supports the build of aspectj plugins
> headlessly.
>
> 3. Because the projects (using aspectj) does not have a
> org.eclipse.jdt.core.javabuilder build-command no classes will be built
> using a default headless installation (whitout
> org.eclipse.jdt.core.javabuilder).
> As effect, simply the class can not be found e.g. "NameProvider cannot
> be resolved"
>
> 4. That the plugin org.eclipse.jdt.core.javabuilder takes effect, the
> documentation sais, that I should make shure, that the eclipse antrunner
> points to the org.eclipse.ajdt.pde.build/scripts/build.xml ant script.
>
> And now the question: How to do this for buckminster?
>
> Thanks for your response,
> Alain.
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Any experience using buckminster and AspectJ? [message #503443 is a reply to message #502616] |
Sun, 13 December 2009 22:32 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi.
It seams, that the AspectJ developpment team must supply a feature, that
implements its AJDT builder headlessly. I opened a Issue on the
"bugs.eclipse.org" for that:
Bug 297713 - AJDT for Headless Buckminster build process
It would be very kind, if the Buckminster dev-team could support the
AJDT-dev team in resolving this issue.
Thenks for your help,
Alain.
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05075 seconds
Home