|
|
Re: Package Level Javadoc [message #485791 is a reply to message #485779] |
Tue, 15 September 2009 03:03 |
Paul Glezen Messages: 60 Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
Fair enough, Ed. Now would that be an ask-me-later, file-a-bug,
maybe-next-release, let-me-think-about-it no? Or a drop-dead, wtf,
are-you-nuts, get-lost, screw-that, hell no?
Just wondering. ;)
Ed Merks wrote:
> Paul,
>
> No.
>
>
> Paul Glezen wrote:
>> Is there a mechanism for specifying package-level Javadocs (generating
>> either package.html or package-info.java) for generating code from an
>> EMF model?
|
|
|
Re: Package Level Javadoc [message #485884 is a reply to message #485791] |
Tue, 15 September 2009 12:41 |
Ed Merks Messages: 33216 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Paul,
Given that a particular EPackage and result in quite a large number of
Java packages, i.e, the interface package, the implementation package,
the util package, the item providers package, and so on, it's a lot of
different things you'd need to generate. They'd typically not be small
either, to be useful, so I'm more tending toward the end of your list of
explicatives. :-P
Paul Glezen wrote:
> Fair enough, Ed. Now would that be an ask-me-later, file-a-bug,
> maybe-next-release, let-me-think-about-it no? Or a drop-dead, wtf,
> are-you-nuts, get-lost, screw-that, hell no?
>
> Just wondering. ;)
>
> Ed Merks wrote:
>> Paul,
>>
>> No.
>>
>>
>> Paul Glezen wrote:
>>> Is there a mechanism for specifying package-level Javadocs
>>> (generating either package.html or package-info.java) for generating
>>> code from an EMF model?
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03288 seconds