Eclipse Community Forums: EMF » Extra getPackage in model generation

Help

Home

Home » Modeling » EMF » Extra getPackage in model generation

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Extra getPackage in model generation [message #482458]

Wed, 26 August 2009 15:51

Paul Glezen

Messages: 60
Registered: July 2009

Member

When I generate my model code, my FactoryImpl has the following extra
getPackage() method generated (the second one). Each time I generate, I
simply delete the second one and move on.

/**
* 
* 
* @generated
*/
public xyz.ast.Package getPackage() {
return (xyz.ast.Package)getEPackage();
}

/**
* 
* 
* @deprecated
* @generated
*/
@Deprecated
public static xyz.ast.Package getPackage() {
return xyz.ast.Package.eINSTANCE;
}

Is there a way I can prevent the erroneous "deprecated" method from
being generated?

Report message to a moderator

Re: Extra getPackage in model generation [message #482532 is a reply to message #482458]

Wed, 26 August 2009 22:56

Ed Merks

Messages: 30687
Registered: July 2009

Senior Member

Paul,

Hmmm. Did you set your package prefix to be the empty string? That's
certainly not expected nor something that's supported...

Paul Glezen wrote:
> When I generate my model code, my FactoryImpl has the following extra
> getPackage() method generated (the second one). Each time I generate,
> I simply delete the second one and move on.
>
> /**
> * 
> * 
> * @generated
> */
> public xyz.ast.Package getPackage() {
> return (xyz.ast.Package)getEPackage();
> }
>
> /**
> * 
> * 
> * @deprecated
> * @generated
> */
> @Deprecated
> public static xyz.ast.Package getPackage() {
> return xyz.ast.Package.eINSTANCE;
> }
>
> Is there a way I can prevent the erroneous "deprecated" method from
> being generated?

Report message to a moderator

Re: Extra getPackage in model generation [message #482555 is a reply to message #482532]

Thu, 27 August 2009 03:30

Paul Glezen

Messages: 60
Registered: July 2009

Member

Guilty. :(

Ed Merks wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Hmmm. Did you set your package prefix to be the empty string? That's
> certainly not expected nor something that's supported...
>
>

Report message to a moderator