Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Archived » XML Schema Definition (XSD) » XSDSimpleFinal has no EXTENSION
XSDSimpleFinal has no EXTENSION [message #48834] Fri, 09 July 2004 06:07 Go to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: jtaylor.nextance.com

The XSDSimpleFinal class has no value for "extension", but if I'm reading
the W3C spec correctly, it indicates that this is one of the valid values.

Also, to test whether or not xsdSimpleTypeDefinition.getLexicalFinal()
contains XSDSimpleFinal.RESTRICTION_LITERAL, do I need to test for both
XSDSimpleFinal.RESTRICTION_LITERAL and XSDSimpleFinal.ALL_LITERAL?

Thanks,

James

Report message to a moderator

Re: XSDSimpleFinal has no EXTENSION [message #48893 is a reply to message #48834] Mon, 12 July 2004 12:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com

--------------54BA90BAFCDBB4D665BCE2D2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

James,

There may have been some errata about this, but the definition I see
(http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#defn-final) only has this:

final = (#all | (list | union | restriction)


and this:

{final}
A subset of {restriction, list, union}.


You should probably be checking if getFinal contains RESTRICTION; if you check
getLexicalFinal, you'll have to look for ALL as well.


James Taylor wrote:

> The XSDSimpleFinal class has no value for "extension", but if I'm reading
> the W3C spec correctly, it indicates that this is one of the valid values.
>
> Also, to test whether or not xsdSimpleTypeDefinition.getLexicalFinal()
> contains XSDSimpleFinal.RESTRICTION_LITERAL, do I need to test for both
> XSDSimpleFinal.RESTRICTION_LITERAL and XSDSimpleFinal.ALL_LITERAL?
>
> Thanks,
>
> James

--------------54BA90BAFCDBB4D665BCE2D2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
James,
<p>There may have been some errata about this, but the definition I see
(<A HREF="http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#defn-final">http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#defn-final</A>) only has this:
<blockquote>final = (#all | (list | union | restriction)
<br>&nbsp;</blockquote>
and this:
<blockquote>{final}
<br>A subset of {restriction, list, union}.
<br>&nbsp;</blockquote>
You should probably be checking if getFinal contains RESTRICTION; if you
check getLexicalFinal, you'll have to look for ALL as well.
<br>&nbsp;
<p>James Taylor wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>The XSDSimpleFinal class has no value for "extension",
but if I'm reading
<br>the W3C spec correctly, it indicates that this is one of the valid
values.
<p>Also, to test whether or not xsdSimpleTypeDefinition.getLexicalFinal()
<br>contains XSDSimpleFinal.RESTRICTION_LITERAL, do I need to test for
both
<br>XSDSimpleFinal.RESTRICTION_LITERAL and XSDSimpleFinal.ALL_LITERAL?
<p>Thanks,
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; James</blockquote>
</html>

--------------54BA90BAFCDBB4D665BCE2D2--

Report message to a moderator

Re: XSDSimpleFinal has no EXTENSION [message #49616 is a reply to message #48893] Tue, 27 July 2004 19:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: jtaylor.nextance.com

Ed,

I was looking at XML Schema Part 1: Structures
( http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-1-20010502/#Simple_T ype_Definitions),
which lists the following possible options for a Simple Type Definition:

{final}
A subset of {extension, list, restriction, union}.

Seems like there's a conflict?

James

Ed Merks wrote:

> James,

> There may have been some errata about this, but the definition I see
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#defn-final) only has this:

> final = (#all | (list | union | restriction)


> and this:

> {final}
> A subset of {restriction, list, union}.


> You should probably be checking if getFinal contains RESTRICTION; if you
check
> getLexicalFinal, you'll have to look for ALL as well.


> James Taylor wrote:

> > The XSDSimpleFinal class has no value for "extension", but if I'm reading
> > the W3C spec correctly, it indicates that this is one of the valid values.
> >
> > Also, to test whether or not xsdSimpleTypeDefinition.getLexicalFinal()
> > contains XSDSimpleFinal.RESTRICTION_LITERAL, do I need to test for both
> > XSDSimpleFinal.RESTRICTION_LITERAL and XSDSimpleFinal.ALL_LITERAL?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > James

Report message to a moderator

Re: XSDSimpleFinal has no EXTENSION [message #49645 is a reply to message #49616] Wed, 28 July 2004 13:03 Go to previous message
Eclipse UserFriend
Originally posted by: merks.ca.ibm.com

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------040903030303060809040200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

James,

Yes, it is contradictory. If the syntax doesn't allow "extension" then
it's hard to imagine how the property can be populated with an
"extension" value. I'm not sure how the errata resolved this issue...


James Taylor wrote:

>Ed,
>
>I was looking at XML Schema Part 1: Structures
>( http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-1-20010502/#Simple_T ype_Definitions),
>which lists the following possible options for a Simple Type Definition:
>
>{final}
>A subset of {extension, list, restriction, union}.
>
>Seems like there's a conflict?
>
> James
>
>Ed Merks wrote:
>
>
>
>>James,
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>There may have been some errata about this, but the definition I see
>>(http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#defn-final) only has this:
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> final = (#all | (list | union | restriction)
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>and this:
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> {final}
>> A subset of {restriction, list, union}.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>You should probably be checking if getFinal contains RESTRICTION; if you
>>
>>
>check
>
>
>>getLexicalFinal, you'll have to look for ALL as well.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>James Taylor wrote:
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>>The XSDSimpleFinal class has no value for "extension", but if I'm reading
>>>the W3C spec correctly, it indicates that this is one of the valid values.
>>>
>>>Also, to test whether or not xsdSimpleTypeDefinition.getLexicalFinal()
>>>contains XSDSimpleFinal.RESTRICTION_LITERAL, do I need to test for both
>>>XSDSimpleFinal.RESTRICTION_LITERAL and XSDSimpleFinal.ALL_LITERAL?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>> James
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>

--------------040903030303060809040200
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-15"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
James,<br>
<br>
Yes, it is contradictory.

Report message to a moderator

Re: XSDSimpleFinal has no EXTENSION [message #589683 is a reply to message #48834] Mon, 12 July 2004 12:09 Go to previous message
Ed Merks is currently offline Ed MerksFriend
Messages: 33142
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
--------------54BA90BAFCDBB4D665BCE2D2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

James,

There may have been some errata about this, but the definition I see
(http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#defn-final) only has this:

final = (#all | (list | union | restriction)


and this:

{final}
A subset of {restriction, list, union}.


You should probably be checking if getFinal contains RESTRICTION; if you check
getLexicalFinal, you'll have to look for ALL as well.


James Taylor wrote:

> The XSDSimpleFinal class has no value for "extension", but if I'm reading
> the W3C spec correctly, it indicates that this is one of the valid values.
>
> Also, to test whether or not xsdSimpleTypeDefinition.getLexicalFinal()
> contains XSDSimpleFinal.RESTRICTION_LITERAL, do I need to test for both
> XSDSimpleFinal.RESTRICTION_LITERAL and XSDSimpleFinal.ALL_LITERAL?
>
> Thanks,
>
> James

--------------54BA90BAFCDBB4D665BCE2D2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
James,
<p>There may have been some errata about this, but the definition I see
(<A HREF="http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#defn-final">http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#defn-final</A>) only has this:
<blockquote>final = (#all | (list | union | restriction)
<br>&nbsp;</blockquote>
and this:
<blockquote>{final}
<br>A subset of {restriction, list, union}.
<br>&nbsp;</blockquote>
You should probably be checking if getFinal contains RESTRICTION; if you
check getLexicalFinal, you'll have to look for ALL as well.
<br>&nbsp;
<p>James Taylor wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>The XSDSimpleFinal class has no value for "extension",
but if I'm reading
<br>the W3C spec correctly, it indicates that this is one of the valid
values.
<p>Also, to test whether or not xsdSimpleTypeDefinition.getLexicalFinal()
<br>contains XSDSimpleFinal.RESTRICTION_LITERAL, do I need to test for
both
<br>XSDSimpleFinal.RESTRICTION_LITERAL and XSDSimpleFinal.ALL_LITERAL?
<p>Thanks,
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; James</blockquote>
</html>

--------------54BA90BAFCDBB4D665BCE2D2--

Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/

Report message to a moderator

Re: XSDSimpleFinal has no EXTENSION [message #589941 is a reply to message #48893] Tue, 27 July 2004 19:12 Go to previous message
James Taylor is currently offline James TaylorFriend
Messages: 21
Registered: July 2009
Junior Member
Ed,

I was looking at XML Schema Part 1: Structures
( http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-1-20010502/#Simple_T ype_Definitions),
which lists the following possible options for a Simple Type Definition:

{final}
A subset of {extension, list, restriction, union}.

Seems like there's a conflict?

James

Ed Merks wrote:

> James,

> There may have been some errata about this, but the definition I see
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#defn-final) only has this:

> final = (#all | (list | union | restriction)


> and this:

> {final}
> A subset of {restriction, list, union}.


> You should probably be checking if getFinal contains RESTRICTION; if you
check
> getLexicalFinal, you'll have to look for ALL as well.


> James Taylor wrote:

> > The XSDSimpleFinal class has no value for "extension", but if I'm reading
> > the W3C spec correctly, it indicates that this is one of the valid values.
> >
> > Also, to test whether or not xsdSimpleTypeDefinition.getLexicalFinal()
> > contains XSDSimpleFinal.RESTRICTION_LITERAL, do I need to test for both
> > XSDSimpleFinal.RESTRICTION_LITERAL and XSDSimpleFinal.ALL_LITERAL?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > James

Report message to a moderator

Re: XSDSimpleFinal has no EXTENSION [message #589949 is a reply to message #49616] Wed, 28 July 2004 13:03 Go to previous message
Ed Merks is currently offline Ed MerksFriend
Messages: 33142
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------040903030303060809040200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

James,

Yes, it is contradictory. If the syntax doesn't allow "extension" then
it's hard to imagine how the property can be populated with an
"extension" value. I'm not sure how the errata resolved this issue...


James Taylor wrote:

>Ed,
>
>I was looking at XML Schema Part 1: Structures
>( http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-1-20010502/#Simple_T ype_Definitions),
>which lists the following possible options for a Simple Type Definition:
>
>{final}
>A subset of {extension, list, restriction, union}.
>
>Seems like there's a conflict?
>
> James
>
>Ed Merks wrote:
>
>
>
>>James,
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>There may have been some errata about this, but the definition I see
>>(http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#defn-final) only has this:
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> final = (#all | (list | union | restriction)
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>and this:
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> {final}
>> A subset of {restriction, list, union}.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>You should probably be checking if getFinal contains RESTRICTION; if you
>>
>>
>check
>
>
>>getLexicalFinal, you'll have to look for ALL as well.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>>James Taylor wrote:
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>>The XSDSimpleFinal class has no value for "extension", but if I'm reading
>>>the W3C spec correctly, it indicates that this is one of the valid values.
>>>
>>>Also, to test whether or not xsdSimpleTypeDefinition.getLexicalFinal()
>>>contains XSDSimpleFinal.RESTRICTION_LITERAL, do I need to test for both
>>>XSDSimpleFinal.RESTRICTION_LITERAL and XSDSimpleFinal.ALL_LITERAL?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>> James
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>

--------------040903030303060809040200
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-15"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
James,<br>
<br>
Yes, it is contradictory.

Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:Create 'template' xml from xsd model
Next Topic:NullPointerException in XSDECoreBuilder
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Fri Apr 26 10:01:24 GMT 2024

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05081 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top

Sign up to our Newsletter

A fresh new issue delivered monthly