Home » Modeling » UML2 » Instance Specification in Composite Structure diagram
|
Re: Instance Specification in Composite Structure diagram [message #476659 is a reply to message #476657] |
Wed, 21 November 2007 19:35 |
Kenn Hussey Messages: 1620 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Tatiana,
There are some (really) old threads about how to represent links; have you
doing a Web search of the newsgroups (http://www.eclipse.org/newsgroups/)?
Kenn
"Tatiana Fesenko" <tatiana.fesenko@borland.com> wrote in message
news:6785c526250c8c9fa8a7f5338e5@news.eclipse.org...
> Hello all,
>
> I have a question concerning Instance Specification in Composite Structure
> diagram.
> UML spec 07-02-03 9.3.13 Structured Classifier, Figure 9.26 - 'A instance
> of the Car class' shows Instance specification with nested instance
> specifications connected by links. But Instance Specification cannot own
> other InstanceSpecifications. If those nested Instance Specifications are
> InstanceValues they should be shown outside and connected to the instance
> (UML 07-02-03 7.3.23 InstanceValue An instance value can appear using
> textual or graphical notation. When textual, as can appear for the value
> of an attribute slot, the name of the instance is shown. When graphical, a
> reference value is shown by connecting to the instance).
> So, I am confused. Can anybody tell me, how model for these picture looks
> like. *.uml file will be the best answer.
> Best wishes,
> Tatiana.
>
>
|
|
|
Re: Instance Specification in Composite Structure diagram [message #476660 is a reply to message #476657] |
Wed, 21 November 2007 20:03 |
james bruck Messages: 1724 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Tatiana,
I believe those inner items ( leftfront, leftrear etc ) are Slots and not
InstanceSpecification's. The definingFeature of the slots would be the
parts corresponding to the various tires. Have a look at Figure 7.53 at the
explanation of Slots.
Regards,
- James.
"Tatiana Fesenko" <tatiana.fesenko@borland.com> wrote in message
news:6785c526250c8c9fa8a7f5338e5@news.eclipse.org...
> Hello all,
>
> I have a question concerning Instance Specification in Composite Structure
> diagram.
>
> UML spec 07-02-03 9.3.13 Structured Classifier, Figure 9.26 - 'A instance
> of the Car class' shows Instance specification with nested instance
specifications
> connected by links. But Instance Specification cannot own other
InstanceSpecifications.
> If those nested Instance Specifications are InstanceValues they should be
> shown outside and connected to the instance (UML 07-02-03 7.3.23
InstanceValue
> An instance value can appear using textual or graphical notation. When
textual,
> as can appear for the value of an attribute slot, the name of the instance
> is shown. When graphical, a reference value is shown by connecting to the
> instance).
>
> So, I am confused. Can anybody tell me, how model for these picture looks
> like. *.uml file will be the best answer.
>
> Best wishes,
> Tatiana.
>
>
|
|
|
Re: Instance Specification in Composite Structure diagram [message #476661 is a reply to message #476660] |
Wed, 21 November 2007 22:51 |
james bruck Messages: 1724 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Tatiana,
If you are still having issues with this I can produce the .uml.
- James.
"James Bruck" <jbruck@ca.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:fi22uj$589$2@build.eclipse.org...
> Hi Tatiana,
>
> I believe those inner items ( leftfront, leftrear etc ) are Slots and not
> InstanceSpecification's. The definingFeature of the slots would be the
> parts corresponding to the various tires. Have a look at Figure 7.53 at
> the
> explanation of Slots.
>
> Regards,
>
> - James.
>
>
> "Tatiana Fesenko" <tatiana.fesenko@borland.com> wrote in message
> news:6785c526250c8c9fa8a7f5338e5@news.eclipse.org...
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have a question concerning Instance Specification in Composite
>> Structure
>> diagram.
>>
>> UML spec 07-02-03 9.3.13 Structured Classifier, Figure 9.26 - 'A instance
>> of the Car class' shows Instance specification with nested instance
> specifications
>> connected by links. But Instance Specification cannot own other
> InstanceSpecifications.
>> If those nested Instance Specifications are InstanceValues they should be
>> shown outside and connected to the instance (UML 07-02-03 7.3.23
> InstanceValue
>> An instance value can appear using textual or graphical notation. When
> textual,
>> as can appear for the value of an attribute slot, the name of the
>> instance
>> is shown. When graphical, a reference value is shown by connecting to the
>> instance).
>>
>> So, I am confused. Can anybody tell me, how model for these picture looks
>> like. *.uml file will be the best answer.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Tatiana.
>>
>>
>
>
|
|
|
Re: Instance Specification in Composite Structure diagram [message #476662 is a reply to message #476661] |
Thu, 22 November 2007 12:17 |
Tatiana Fesenko Messages: 530 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
James,
Thanks a lot.
If you produce the .uml it would be great. I am interested in all elements
shown on the figure.
Best regards,
Tatiana.
> Tatiana,
>
> If you are still having issues with this I can produce the .uml.
>
> - James.
>
> "James Bruck" <jbruck@ca.ibm.com> wrote in message
> news:fi22uj$589$2@build.eclipse.org...
>
>> Hi Tatiana,
>>
>> I believe those inner items ( leftfront, leftrear etc ) are Slots and
>> not
>> InstanceSpecification's. The definingFeature of the slots would be
>> the
>> parts corresponding to the various tires. Have a look at Figure 7.53
>> at
>> the
>> explanation of Slots.
>> Regards,
>>
>> - James.
>>
>> "Tatiana Fesenko" <tatiana.fesenko@borland.com> wrote in message
>> news:6785c526250c8c9fa8a7f5338e5@news.eclipse.org...
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I have a question concerning Instance Specification in Composite
>>> Structure
>>> diagram.
>>> UML spec 07-02-03 9.3.13 Structured Classifier, Figure 9.26 - 'A
>>> instance of the Car class' shows Instance specification with nested
>>> instance
>>>
>> specifications
>>
>>> connected by links. But Instance Specification cannot own other
>>>
>> InstanceSpecifications.
>>
>>> If those nested Instance Specifications are InstanceValues they
>>> should be shown outside and connected to the instance (UML 07-02-03
>>> 7.3.23
>>>
>> InstanceValue
>>
>>> An instance value can appear using textual or graphical notation.
>>> When
>>>
>> textual,
>>
>>> as can appear for the value of an attribute slot, the name of the
>>> instance
>>> is shown. When graphical, a reference value is shown by connecting
>>> to the
>>> instance).
>>> So, I am confused. Can anybody tell me, how model for these picture
>>> looks like. *.uml file will be the best answer.
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>> Tatiana.
|
|
|
Re: Instance Specification in Composite Structure diagram [message #476668 is a reply to message #476662] |
Mon, 26 November 2007 14:47 |
james bruck Messages: 1724 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
I believe this is what you are looking for.... let me know if I messed
something up.
Cheers,
- James.
"Tatiana Fesenko" <tatiana.fesenko@borland.com> wrote in message
news:6785c52625288c9fb213277dbce@news.eclipse.org...
> James,
>
> Thanks a lot.
> If you produce the .uml it would be great. I am interested in all elements
> shown on the figure.
>
> Best regards,
> Tatiana.
>
>> Tatiana,
>>
>> If you are still having issues with this I can produce the .uml.
>>
>> - James.
>>
>> "James Bruck" <jbruck@ca.ibm.com> wrote in message
>> news:fi22uj$589$2@build.eclipse.org...
>>
>>> Hi Tatiana,
>>>
>>> I believe those inner items ( leftfront, leftrear etc ) are Slots and
>>> not
>>> InstanceSpecification's. The definingFeature of the slots would be
>>> the
>>> parts corresponding to the various tires. Have a look at Figure 7.53
>>> at
>>> the
>>> explanation of Slots.
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> - James.
>>>
>>> "Tatiana Fesenko" <tatiana.fesenko@borland.com> wrote in message
>>> news:6785c526250c8c9fa8a7f5338e5@news.eclipse.org...
>>>
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> I have a question concerning Instance Specification in Composite
>>>> Structure
>>>> diagram.
>>>> UML spec 07-02-03 9.3.13 Structured Classifier, Figure 9.26 - 'A
>>>> instance of the Car class' shows Instance specification with nested
>>>> instance
>>>>
>>> specifications
>>>
>>>> connected by links. But Instance Specification cannot own other
>>>>
>>> InstanceSpecifications.
>>>
>>>> If those nested Instance Specifications are InstanceValues they
>>>> should be shown outside and connected to the instance (UML 07-02-03
>>>> 7.3.23
>>>>
>>> InstanceValue
>>>
>>>> An instance value can appear using textual or graphical notation.
>>>> When
>>>>
>>> textual,
>>>
>>>> as can appear for the value of an attribute slot, the name of the
>>>> instance
>>>> is shown. When graphical, a reference value is shown by connecting
>>>> to the
>>>> instance).
>>>> So, I am confused. Can anybody tell me, how model for these picture
>>>> looks like. *.uml file will be the best answer.
>>>>
>>>> Best wishes,
>>>> Tatiana.
>
>
-
Attachment: Instance.uml
(Size: 6.21KB, Downloaded 268 times)
|
|
|
Re: Instance Specification in Composite Structure diagram [message #625559 is a reply to message #476657] |
Wed, 21 November 2007 19:35 |
Kenn Hussey Messages: 1620 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Tatiana,
There are some (really) old threads about how to represent links; have you
doing a Web search of the newsgroups (http://www.eclipse.org/newsgroups/)?
Kenn
"Tatiana Fesenko" <tatiana.fesenko@borland.com> wrote in message
news:6785c526250c8c9fa8a7f5338e5@news.eclipse.org...
> Hello all,
>
> I have a question concerning Instance Specification in Composite Structure
> diagram.
> UML spec 07-02-03 9.3.13 Structured Classifier, Figure 9.26 - 'A instance
> of the Car class' shows Instance specification with nested instance
> specifications connected by links. But Instance Specification cannot own
> other InstanceSpecifications. If those nested Instance Specifications are
> InstanceValues they should be shown outside and connected to the instance
> (UML 07-02-03 7.3.23 InstanceValue An instance value can appear using
> textual or graphical notation. When textual, as can appear for the value
> of an attribute slot, the name of the instance is shown. When graphical, a
> reference value is shown by connecting to the instance).
> So, I am confused. Can anybody tell me, how model for these picture looks
> like. *.uml file will be the best answer.
> Best wishes,
> Tatiana.
>
>
|
|
|
Re: Instance Specification in Composite Structure diagram [message #625560 is a reply to message #476657] |
Wed, 21 November 2007 20:03 |
james bruck Messages: 1724 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Tatiana,
I believe those inner items ( leftfront, leftrear etc ) are Slots and not
InstanceSpecification's. The definingFeature of the slots would be the
parts corresponding to the various tires. Have a look at Figure 7.53 at the
explanation of Slots.
Regards,
- James.
"Tatiana Fesenko" <tatiana.fesenko@borland.com> wrote in message
news:6785c526250c8c9fa8a7f5338e5@news.eclipse.org...
> Hello all,
>
> I have a question concerning Instance Specification in Composite Structure
> diagram.
>
> UML spec 07-02-03 9.3.13 Structured Classifier, Figure 9.26 - 'A instance
> of the Car class' shows Instance specification with nested instance
specifications
> connected by links. But Instance Specification cannot own other
InstanceSpecifications.
> If those nested Instance Specifications are InstanceValues they should be
> shown outside and connected to the instance (UML 07-02-03 7.3.23
InstanceValue
> An instance value can appear using textual or graphical notation. When
textual,
> as can appear for the value of an attribute slot, the name of the instance
> is shown. When graphical, a reference value is shown by connecting to the
> instance).
>
> So, I am confused. Can anybody tell me, how model for these picture looks
> like. *.uml file will be the best answer.
>
> Best wishes,
> Tatiana.
>
>
|
|
|
Re: Instance Specification in Composite Structure diagram [message #625561 is a reply to message #476660] |
Wed, 21 November 2007 22:51 |
james bruck Messages: 1724 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Tatiana,
If you are still having issues with this I can produce the .uml.
- James.
"James Bruck" <jbruck@ca.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:fi22uj$589$2@build.eclipse.org...
> Hi Tatiana,
>
> I believe those inner items ( leftfront, leftrear etc ) are Slots and not
> InstanceSpecification's. The definingFeature of the slots would be the
> parts corresponding to the various tires. Have a look at Figure 7.53 at
> the
> explanation of Slots.
>
> Regards,
>
> - James.
>
>
> "Tatiana Fesenko" <tatiana.fesenko@borland.com> wrote in message
> news:6785c526250c8c9fa8a7f5338e5@news.eclipse.org...
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have a question concerning Instance Specification in Composite
>> Structure
>> diagram.
>>
>> UML spec 07-02-03 9.3.13 Structured Classifier, Figure 9.26 - 'A instance
>> of the Car class' shows Instance specification with nested instance
> specifications
>> connected by links. But Instance Specification cannot own other
> InstanceSpecifications.
>> If those nested Instance Specifications are InstanceValues they should be
>> shown outside and connected to the instance (UML 07-02-03 7.3.23
> InstanceValue
>> An instance value can appear using textual or graphical notation. When
> textual,
>> as can appear for the value of an attribute slot, the name of the
>> instance
>> is shown. When graphical, a reference value is shown by connecting to the
>> instance).
>>
>> So, I am confused. Can anybody tell me, how model for these picture looks
>> like. *.uml file will be the best answer.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> Tatiana.
>>
>>
>
>
|
|
|
Re: Instance Specification in Composite Structure diagram [message #625562 is a reply to message #476661] |
Thu, 22 November 2007 12:17 |
Tatiana Fesenko Messages: 530 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
James,
Thanks a lot.
If you produce the .uml it would be great. I am interested in all elements
shown on the figure.
Best regards,
Tatiana.
> Tatiana,
>
> If you are still having issues with this I can produce the .uml.
>
> - James.
>
> "James Bruck" <jbruck@ca.ibm.com> wrote in message
> news:fi22uj$589$2@build.eclipse.org...
>
>> Hi Tatiana,
>>
>> I believe those inner items ( leftfront, leftrear etc ) are Slots and
>> not
>> InstanceSpecification's. The definingFeature of the slots would be
>> the
>> parts corresponding to the various tires. Have a look at Figure 7.53
>> at
>> the
>> explanation of Slots.
>> Regards,
>>
>> - James.
>>
>> "Tatiana Fesenko" <tatiana.fesenko@borland.com> wrote in message
>> news:6785c526250c8c9fa8a7f5338e5@news.eclipse.org...
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I have a question concerning Instance Specification in Composite
>>> Structure
>>> diagram.
>>> UML spec 07-02-03 9.3.13 Structured Classifier, Figure 9.26 - 'A
>>> instance of the Car class' shows Instance specification with nested
>>> instance
>>>
>> specifications
>>
>>> connected by links. But Instance Specification cannot own other
>>>
>> InstanceSpecifications.
>>
>>> If those nested Instance Specifications are InstanceValues they
>>> should be shown outside and connected to the instance (UML 07-02-03
>>> 7.3.23
>>>
>> InstanceValue
>>
>>> An instance value can appear using textual or graphical notation.
>>> When
>>>
>> textual,
>>
>>> as can appear for the value of an attribute slot, the name of the
>>> instance
>>> is shown. When graphical, a reference value is shown by connecting
>>> to the
>>> instance).
>>> So, I am confused. Can anybody tell me, how model for these picture
>>> looks like. *.uml file will be the best answer.
>>>
>>> Best wishes,
>>> Tatiana.
|
|
|
Re: Instance Specification in Composite Structure diagram [message #625568 is a reply to message #476662] |
Mon, 26 November 2007 14:47 |
james bruck Messages: 1724 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
I believe this is what you are looking for.... let me know if I messed
something up.
Cheers,
- James.
"Tatiana Fesenko" <tatiana.fesenko@borland.com> wrote in message
news:6785c52625288c9fb213277dbce@news.eclipse.org...
> James,
>
> Thanks a lot.
> If you produce the .uml it would be great. I am interested in all elements
> shown on the figure.
>
> Best regards,
> Tatiana.
>
>> Tatiana,
>>
>> If you are still having issues with this I can produce the .uml.
>>
>> - James.
>>
>> "James Bruck" <jbruck@ca.ibm.com> wrote in message
>> news:fi22uj$589$2@build.eclipse.org...
>>
>>> Hi Tatiana,
>>>
>>> I believe those inner items ( leftfront, leftrear etc ) are Slots and
>>> not
>>> InstanceSpecification's. The definingFeature of the slots would be
>>> the
>>> parts corresponding to the various tires. Have a look at Figure 7.53
>>> at
>>> the
>>> explanation of Slots.
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> - James.
>>>
>>> "Tatiana Fesenko" <tatiana.fesenko@borland.com> wrote in message
>>> news:6785c526250c8c9fa8a7f5338e5@news.eclipse.org...
>>>
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> I have a question concerning Instance Specification in Composite
>>>> Structure
>>>> diagram.
>>>> UML spec 07-02-03 9.3.13 Structured Classifier, Figure 9.26 - 'A
>>>> instance of the Car class' shows Instance specification with nested
>>>> instance
>>>>
>>> specifications
>>>
>>>> connected by links. But Instance Specification cannot own other
>>>>
>>> InstanceSpecifications.
>>>
>>>> If those nested Instance Specifications are InstanceValues they
>>>> should be shown outside and connected to the instance (UML 07-02-03
>>>> 7.3.23
>>>>
>>> InstanceValue
>>>
>>>> An instance value can appear using textual or graphical notation.
>>>> When
>>>>
>>> textual,
>>>
>>>> as can appear for the value of an attribute slot, the name of the
>>>> instance
>>>> is shown. When graphical, a reference value is shown by connecting
>>>> to the
>>>> instance).
>>>> So, I am confused. Can anybody tell me, how model for these picture
>>>> looks like. *.uml file will be the best answer.
>>>>
>>>> Best wishes,
>>>> Tatiana.
>
>
-
Attachment: Instance.uml
(Size: 6.21KB, Downloaded 202 times)
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Apr 26 14:12:31 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04559 seconds
|