| [ATL] ADT feature in CVS inconsistent w/ repository [message #48011] |
Thu, 21 June 2007 13:36  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Originally posted by: matt.mcgill.gmail.com
Hello,
I'm putting together a prepared Eclipse bundle for TCS/ATL development,
and I was hoping to use the latest sources from CVS. I see that a commit
to org.eclipse.m2m.atl.adt-feature/feature.xml on 5/30/07 added
references to the following plugins:
org.eclipse.m2m.atl.service.core
org.eclipse.m2m.atl.service.sample
org.eclipse.m2m.atl.service.ui
These plugins do not appear to have been committed to the repository
just yet. I notice that others have also recently had difficulties with
the tools as checked out from source.
This should make me happy, because it means you're busily working away
=) I'm excited to play with the new functionality when it becomes
available.
In the mean time, I have a request: in the future, from time to time,
when the CVSHEAD is at a point where everything should be consistent
(not finished or bug-free, just consistent), could you tag it? That way
we can provide you with good feedback, instead of wasting your time with
transient problems caused by normal development activities.
Thanks!
-Matt McGill
|
|
|
| Re: [ATL] ADT feature in CVS inconsistent w/ repository [message #50684 is a reply to message #48011] |
Wed, 04 July 2007 08:47  |
 Frédéric Jouault
Messages: 572
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hello,
We have been working on the features, and the problem you reported
should now be solved.
Can you please confirm this?
Thanks,
Frédéric Jouault
Matt McGill wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm putting together a prepared Eclipse bundle for TCS/ATL development,
> and I was hoping to use the latest sources from CVS. I see that a commit
> to org.eclipse.m2m.atl.adt-feature/feature.xml on 5/30/07 added
> references to the following plugins:
> org.eclipse.m2m.atl.service.core
> org.eclipse.m2m.atl.service.sample
> org.eclipse.m2m.atl.service.ui
>
> These plugins do not appear to have been committed to the repository
> just yet. I notice that others have also recently had difficulties with
> the tools as checked out from source.
>
> This should make me happy, because it means you're busily working away
> =) I'm excited to play with the new functionality when it becomes
> available.
>
> In the mean time, I have a request: in the future, from time to time,
> when the CVSHEAD is at a point where everything should be consistent
> (not finished or bug-free, just consistent), could you tag it? That way
> we can provide you with good feedback, instead of wasting your time with
> transient problems caused by normal development activities.
>
> Thanks!
> -Matt McGill
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01518 seconds
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
