Home » Modeling » Papyrus » Current available CVS for Papyrus
| | |
| Re: Current available CVS for Papyrus [message #468996 is a reply to message #468994] |
Sat, 01 November 2008 01:25   |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Indeed, that's what it looks like which might be a bit of a problem
because support for the UML 2.2 API would require the UML 3.0 component
which has been built against EMF 2.5 which in turn requires Eclipse 3.5.
So, is the papyrus component really committed to the UML 2.1.2 metamodel
without any reasonable option to use the UML 2.2 metamodel?
For me, the distinction matters because the Executable UML metamodel is
aligned to UML 2.2 instead of UML 2.1.2
-- Nicolas.
Kenn Hussey wrote:
> I believe it's being done against Ganymede at this point...
>
> Kenn
>
> "Nicolas Rouquette" <nicolas.rouquette@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote in message
> news:geffi3$cg4$1@build.eclipse.org...
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for the link.
>>
>> Can you please clarify what is the configuration (branch, head) of Eclipse
>> against which you develop papyrus?
>>
>>
>> -- Nicolas.
>>
>> Sébastien Gérard wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the Papyrus team is currently working very hard to produce the first
>>> bundle of code for Papyrus. We should be able to deliver this bundle to
>>> the Eclipse IP review process early November, this year of course ;-)
>>>
>>> For whose who are very impatiant to have a look, please look at here:
>>> https://speedy.supelec.fr/Papyrus/svn/Papyrus/core/experimen t/papyrus-gmf/
>>>
>>> And do not hesitate to send us bugs/bug fiixes and other new features if
>>> you want.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> --Séb.
>
>
|
|
| | | |
| Re: Building papyrus. [message #469005 is a reply to message #469004] |
Wed, 12 November 2008 09:32 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Nicolas,
Sorry for the delay. We can found a Papyrus build on the Obeo site. We
have published two Update site:
* The first site contains all plugins selected for the IPZilla (Papyrus
Core and the GMF diagrams : EMFTree, Class, Activity, Sequence and
UseCase diagrams)
- it required this :
- Eclipse Ganymede
- EMF Runtime and Tools 2.4.1
- GMF Runtime 1.1.2
- UML2 End Users 2.2.1
- OCL 2.0 End Users 1.2.2
- EMF Model Query Runtime 1.2.0
- This Update-Site is here :
http://www.obeo.fr/download/papyrus/incubation
* The second site contains all plugins in development/experimentation
(all IPZIlla plugins and several integration plugins kind like Papyrus I
diagrams, UMl2tools clazz diagram integration, Java reverse ...)
- it required additionnal plugins :
- EMFT EcoreTools Runtime 0.8.0
- MDT UML2Tools Runtime 0.8.1
- This Update-Site is here :
http://www.obeo.fr/download/papyrus/all
Regards,
Jérôme.
--
Obeo, Model Driven Company
--
"Code is a model, Show me the model!"
http://www.benois.fr
Le mercredi 05 novembre 2008 à 12:56 +0100, S?bastien G?rard a écrit :
> Bonjour Nicolas,
>
> yes, we are going to do that. Rmi and Jerome are going to setup an update
> site that will enable you to download Papyrus in your eclipse. They will
> provide you that facilities at last for tomorrow. They will post the
> information as soon it is ready.
>
> Cheers,
> Sbastien.
>
> "Nicolas Rouquette" <nicolas.rouquette@jpl.nasa.gov> a crit dans le message
> de news: geicb5$v5f$1@build.eclipse.org...
> > Could someone post instructions for building the papyrus component?
> >
> > -- Nicolas.
|
|
| | | |
| Re: Building papyrus. [message #469261 is a reply to message #469253] |
Mon, 26 January 2009 14:34 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply Sébastien. So, to summarize on the status of the
kits, 0.7.0 is later than 1.11.0, but has a lower number because of
Eclipse numbering rules. However, 1.11.0, although older, is currently
still the preferred version because it is more capable.
Any feedback on what SVN URL we should be using to build from source?
I looked on the MDT web site and checked the wiki, but didn't see
anything relevant.
Tom
Sébastien Gérard wrote:
> Version 1.11.0 available on the www.papyrusuml.org website is the original
> version of Papyrus and the most advanced current version of the tool. But
> this version is relying on pure GEF and on EMF.
>
> The new version of Papyrus (resulting from the merging of two other existing
> UML modeler, one of the TopCASED project and on eof the oskitt project) has
> been acceptedd as an eclipse project under the umbrella of MDT. In this
> context, being in its incubation phace is numbering as to be 0.x.y.
> Finally, as we only go through the ipzilla process of Eclipse, we had not
> the eclipse svn service, so we used our previous svn service but it was
> notpossible there to propose rcp. For that resaon, there were momentally
> available on the obeo web site whoch one of the participants of the project.
> Now, we have the svn provided from Eclipse and other facilities, so
> everything sould be available soon in a transparent manner on the
> www.eclipse.org/mdt web site uder the Papyrus component.
>
> Sébastien.
>
>
> "Tom Morris" <tfmorris@gmail.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
> glaaj2$9c2$1@build.eclipse.org...
>> Jerome BENOIS wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry for the delay. We can found a Papyrus build on the Obeo site. We
>>> have published two Update site:
>> ...
>>> - This Update-Site is here :
>>> http://www.obeo.fr/download/papyrus/incubation
>> How does the version (0.7.0 currently) on this commercial site relate to
>> the version on the papyrusuml.org site (1.11.0 currently)?
>>
>> Which is later and/or preferred?
>>
>> Tom
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Building papyrus. [message #469327 is a reply to message #469250] |
Mon, 09 February 2009 11:27 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Tom Morris wrote:
> Nicolas Rouquette asked:
>
>> Could someone post instructions for building the papyrus component?
>
> To which Jerome Benois replied with instructions on how to install a
> pre-built Papyrus from his company's web site.
[...]
> More recently I saw a note saying the the sources were moving to
> svn+ssh://dev.eclipse.org/svnroot/modeling/org.eclipse.mdt.p apyrus
> but it doesn't look like http access is enabled for that repository
> making it impossible for those without accounts on eclipse.org to access
> (unless I'm missing something).
>
> Can someone post the correct SVN url and a .psf file or a couple of
> sentences worth of instructions?
Since no one would reply here, I sent email directly to the Eclipse
webmaster.
HTTP access is now enabled and the sources can be accessed at
http://dev.eclipse.org/svnroot/modeling/org.eclipse.mdt.papy rus.
I also had Papyrus added to the ViewCVS config to make it easier to find
from the web site.
I hope this keeps the next person from having to waste as much time as I
did. I'll post build directions separately.
Tom
|
|
|
| Re: Current available CVS for Papyrus [message #573034 is a reply to message #468973] |
Fri, 31 October 2008 13:35 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi,
Thanks for the link.
Can you please clarify what is the configuration (branch, head) of
Eclipse against which you develop papyrus?
-- Nicolas.
Sébastien Gérard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the Papyrus team is currently working very hard to produce the first bundle
> of code for Papyrus. We should be able to deliver this bundle to the Eclipse
> IP review process early November, this year of course ;-)
>
> For whose who are very impatiant to have a look, please look at here:
> https://speedy.supelec.fr/Papyrus/svn/Papyrus/core/experimen t/papyrus-gmf/
>
> And do not hesitate to send us bugs/bug fiixes and other new features if you
> want.
>
> Regards,
>
> --Séb.
>
>
|
|
| |
| Re: Current available CVS for Papyrus [message #573122 is a reply to message #468994] |
Sat, 01 November 2008 01:25 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Indeed, that's what it looks like which might be a bit of a problem
because support for the UML 2.2 API would require the UML 3.0 component
which has been built against EMF 2.5 which in turn requires Eclipse 3.5.
So, is the papyrus component really committed to the UML 2.1.2 metamodel
without any reasonable option to use the UML 2.2 metamodel?
For me, the distinction matters because the Executable UML metamodel is
aligned to UML 2.2 instead of UML 2.1.2
-- Nicolas.
Kenn Hussey wrote:
> I believe it's being done against Ganymede at this point...
>
> Kenn
>
> "Nicolas Rouquette" <nicolas.rouquette@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote in message
> news:geffi3$cg4$1@build.eclipse.org...
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for the link.
>>
>> Can you please clarify what is the configuration (branch, head) of Eclipse
>> against which you develop papyrus?
>>
>>
>> -- Nicolas.
>>
>> Sébastien Gérard wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the Papyrus team is currently working very hard to produce the first
>>> bundle of code for Papyrus. We should be able to deliver this bundle to
>>> the Eclipse IP review process early November, this year of course ;-)
>>>
>>> For whose who are very impatiant to have a look, please look at here:
>>> https://speedy.supelec.fr/Papyrus/svn/Papyrus/core/experimen t/papyrus-gmf/
>>>
>>> And do not hesitate to send us bugs/bug fiixes and other new features if
>>> you want.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> --Séb.
>
>
|
|
| |
| Re: Current available CVS for Papyrus [message #573185 is a reply to message #468996] |
Mon, 03 November 2008 12:16 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Nicolas,
I'm sure the Papyrus team will retarget the code for Galileo once the
initial contribution is made and the code is in CVS...
Kenn
"Nicolas Rouquette" <nicolas.rouquette@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote in message
news:490BE860.8020500@jpl.nasa.gov...
> Indeed, that's what it looks like which might be a bit of a problem
> because support for the UML 2.2 API would require the UML 3.0 component
> which has been built against EMF 2.5 which in turn requires Eclipse 3.5.
>
> So, is the papyrus component really committed to the UML 2.1.2 metamodel
> without any reasonable option to use the UML 2.2 metamodel?
>
> For me, the distinction matters because the Executable UML metamodel is
> aligned to UML 2.2 instead of UML 2.1.2
>
> -- Nicolas.
>
> Kenn Hussey wrote:
>> I believe it's being done against Ganymede at this point...
>>
>> Kenn
>>
>> "Nicolas Rouquette" <nicolas.rouquette@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote in message
>> news:geffi3$cg4$1@build.eclipse.org...
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the link.
>>>
>>> Can you please clarify what is the configuration (branch, head) of
>>> Eclipse against which you develop papyrus?
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Nicolas.
>>>
>>> S
|
|
| |
| Re: Building papyrus. [message #573229 is a reply to message #469004] |
Wed, 12 November 2008 09:32 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Nicolas,
Sorry for the delay. We can found a Papyrus build on the Obeo site. We
have published two Update site:
* The first site contains all plugins selected for the IPZilla (Papyrus
Core and the GMF diagrams : EMFTree, Class, Activity, Sequence and
UseCase diagrams)
- it required this :
- Eclipse Ganymede
- EMF Runtime and Tools 2.4.1
- GMF Runtime 1.1.2
- UML2 End Users 2.2.1
- OCL 2.0 End Users 1.2.2
- EMF Model Query Runtime 1.2.0
- This Update-Site is here :
http://www.obeo.fr/download/papyrus/incubation
* The second site contains all plugins in development/experimentation
(all IPZIlla plugins and several integration plugins kind like Papyrus I
diagrams, UMl2tools clazz diagram integration, Java reverse ...)
- it required additionnal plugins :
- EMFT EcoreTools Runtime 0.8.0
- MDT UML2Tools Runtime 0.8.1
- This Update-Site is here :
http://www.obeo.fr/download/papyrus/all
Regards,
Jérôme.
--
Obeo, Model Driven Company
--
"Code is a model, Show me the model!"
http://www.benois.fr
Le mercredi 05 novembre 2008 à 12:56 +0100, S?bastien G?rard a écrit :
> Bonjour Nicolas,
>
> yes, we are going to do that. Rmi and Jerome are going to setup an update
> site that will enable you to download Papyrus in your eclipse. They will
> provide you that facilities at last for tomorrow. They will post the
> information as soon it is ready.
>
> Cheers,
> Sbastien.
>
> "Nicolas Rouquette" <nicolas.rouquette@jpl.nasa.gov> a crit dans le message
> de news: geicb5$v5f$1@build.eclipse.org...
> > Could someone post instructions for building the papyrus component?
> >
> > -- Nicolas.
|
|
|
| Re: Building papyrus. [message #581477 is a reply to message #469005] |
Thu, 22 January 2009 12:32 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Jerome BENOIS wrote:
> Sorry for the delay. We can found a Papyrus build on the Obeo site. We
> have published two Update site:
....
> - This Update-Site is here :
> http://www.obeo.fr/download/papyrus/incubation
How does the version (0.7.0 currently) on this commercial site relate to
the version on the papyrusuml.org site (1.11.0 currently)?
Which is later and/or preferred?
Tom
|
|
| |
| Re: Building papyrus. [message #581493 is a reply to message #469246] |
Thu, 22 January 2009 17:36 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Version 1.11.0 available on the www.papyrusuml.org website is the original
version of Papyrus and the most advanced current version of the tool. But
this version is relying on pure GEF and on EMF.
The new version of Papyrus (resulting from the merging of two other existing
UML modeler, one of the TopCASED project and on eof the oskitt project) has
been acceptedd as an eclipse project under the umbrella of MDT. In this
context, being in its incubation phace is numbering as to be 0.x.y.
Finally, as we only go through the ipzilla process of Eclipse, we had not
the eclipse svn service, so we used our previous svn service but it was
notpossible there to propose rcp. For that resaon, there were momentally
available on the obeo web site whoch one of the participants of the project.
Now, we have the svn provided from Eclipse and other facilities, so
everything sould be available soon in a transparent manner on the
www.eclipse.org/mdt web site uder the Papyrus component.
S
|
|
|
| Re: Building papyrus. [message #581503 is a reply to message #469253] |
Mon, 26 January 2009 14:34 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply Sébastien. So, to summarize on the status of the
kits, 0.7.0 is later than 1.11.0, but has a lower number because of
Eclipse numbering rules. However, 1.11.0, although older, is currently
still the preferred version because it is more capable.
Any feedback on what SVN URL we should be using to build from source?
I looked on the MDT web site and checked the wiki, but didn't see
anything relevant.
Tom
Sébastien Gérard wrote:
> Version 1.11.0 available on the www.papyrusuml.org website is the original
> version of Papyrus and the most advanced current version of the tool. But
> this version is relying on pure GEF and on EMF.
>
> The new version of Papyrus (resulting from the merging of two other existing
> UML modeler, one of the TopCASED project and on eof the oskitt project) has
> been acceptedd as an eclipse project under the umbrella of MDT. In this
> context, being in its incubation phace is numbering as to be 0.x.y.
> Finally, as we only go through the ipzilla process of Eclipse, we had not
> the eclipse svn service, so we used our previous svn service but it was
> notpossible there to propose rcp. For that resaon, there were momentally
> available on the obeo web site whoch one of the participants of the project.
> Now, we have the svn provided from Eclipse and other facilities, so
> everything sould be available soon in a transparent manner on the
> www.eclipse.org/mdt web site uder the Papyrus component.
>
> Sébastien.
>
>
> "Tom Morris" <tfmorris@gmail.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
> glaaj2$9c2$1@build.eclipse.org...
>> Jerome BENOIS wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry for the delay. We can found a Papyrus build on the Obeo site. We
>>> have published two Update site:
>> ...
>>> - This Update-Site is here :
>>> http://www.obeo.fr/download/papyrus/incubation
>> How does the version (0.7.0 currently) on this commercial site relate to
>> the version on the papyrusuml.org site (1.11.0 currently)?
>>
>> Which is later and/or preferred?
>>
>> Tom
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Building papyrus. [message #581685 is a reply to message #469250] |
Mon, 09 February 2009 11:27 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Tom Morris wrote:
> Nicolas Rouquette asked:
>
>> Could someone post instructions for building the papyrus component?
>
> To which Jerome Benois replied with instructions on how to install a
> pre-built Papyrus from his company's web site.
[...]
> More recently I saw a note saying the the sources were moving to
> svn+ssh://dev.eclipse.org/svnroot/modeling/org.eclipse.mdt.p apyrus
> but it doesn't look like http access is enabled for that repository
> making it impossible for those without accounts on eclipse.org to access
> (unless I'm missing something).
>
> Can someone post the correct SVN url and a .psf file or a couple of
> sentences worth of instructions?
Since no one would reply here, I sent email directly to the Eclipse
webmaster.
HTTP access is now enabled and the sources can be accessed at
http://dev.eclipse.org/svnroot/modeling/org.eclipse.mdt.papy rus
I also had Papyrus added to the ViewCVS config to make it easier to find
from the web site.
I hope this keeps the next person from having to waste as much time as I
did. I'll post build directions separately.
Tom
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Jul 05 03:28:40 EDT 2025
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.08240 seconds |
Home