Home » Archived » AMW » SVN Repository.
| SVN Repository. [message #468653] |
Wed, 19 November 2008 04:32  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi everybody, I'm trying to use AMW for the first time, and I'm trying
to find the sources for it.
I've seen the plugins zip bundles, but as the only way I found to get
AM3 was from sources, and I read somewhere that if you pick sources for
one of the three projects (ATL, AMW, AM3) you should pick sources for
all (in order to avoid versions incompatibilities), I need AMW sources.
Would you be so kind to point me towards the new SVN repository, please?.
Best regards,
Juan Pedro
|
|
|
| Re: SVN Repository. [message #468655 is a reply to message #468653] |
Wed, 19 November 2008 05:05  |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi Juan,
AMW passed through an IP cleaning recently, but the new sources have not
been committed yet.
Regards,
Marcos.
Juan Pedro Silva wrote:
> Hi everybody, I'm trying to use AMW for the first time, and I'm trying
> to find the sources for it.
> I've seen the plugins zip bundles, but as the only way I found to get
> AM3 was from sources, and I read somewhere that if you pick sources for
> one of the three projects (ATL, AMW, AM3) you should pick sources for
> all (in order to avoid versions incompatibilities), I need AMW sources.
> Would you be so kind to point me towards the new SVN repository, please?.
> Best regards,
> Juan Pedro
|
|
| |
| Re: SVN Repository. [message #468659 is a reply to message #468655] |
Wed, 19 November 2008 07:27 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Thank you, Marcos.
I was wondering, as I see little activity in the newsgroup and sources
areas, are efforts being reassigned to other projects like, for
instance, Kermeta?.
Which are the plans for AMW in the future?.
Thank you very much and best regards.
Marcos Didonet Del Fabro escribió:
> Hi Juan,
>
> AMW passed through an IP cleaning recently, but the new sources have
> not been committed yet.
>
> Regards,
>
> Marcos.
>
> Juan Pedro Silva wrote:
>> Hi everybody, I'm trying to use AMW for the first time, and I'm
>> trying to find the sources for it.
>> I've seen the plugins zip bundles, but as the only way I found to get
>> AM3 was from sources, and I read somewhere that if you pick sources
>> for one of the three projects (ATL, AMW, AM3) you should pick sources
>> for all (in order to avoid versions incompatibilities), I need AMW
>> sources.
>> Would you be so kind to point me towards the new SVN repository,
>> please?.
>> Best regards,
>> Juan Pedro
|
|
| |
| Re: SVN Repository. [message #468670 is a reply to message #468659] |
Wed, 19 November 2008 11:51 |
| Eclipse User |
|
|
|
Hi.
We are maintaining AMW as usual. However, I am working only part of my
time on it now, so the evolutions/changes will take more time than usual...
Regards,
Marcos.
Juan Pedro Silva wrote:
> Thank you, Marcos.
> I was wondering, as I see little activity in the newsgroup and sources
> areas, are efforts being reassigned to other projects like, for
> instance, Kermeta?.
> Which are the plans for AMW in the future?.
> Thank you very much and best regards.
>
> Marcos Didonet Del Fabro escribió:
>> Hi Juan,
>>
>> AMW passed through an IP cleaning recently, but the new sources have
>> not been committed yet.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Marcos.
>>
>> Juan Pedro Silva wrote:
>>> Hi everybody, I'm trying to use AMW for the first time, and I'm
>>> trying to find the sources for it.
>>> I've seen the plugins zip bundles, but as the only way I found to get
>>> AM3 was from sources, and I read somewhere that if you pick sources
>>> for one of the three projects (ATL, AMW, AM3) you should pick sources
>>> for all (in order to avoid versions incompatibilities), I need AMW
>>> sources.
>>> Would you be so kind to point me towards the new SVN repository,
>>> please?.
>>> Best regards,
>>> Juan Pedro
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Apr 30 00:50:15 EDT 2025
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03709 seconds |
Home