Home » Eclipse Projects » Standard Widget Toolkit (SWT) » pocket pc, J9 - Tree
| pocket pc, J9 - Tree [message #449983] |
Wed, 02 February 2005 22:19  |
 No real name
Messages: 92
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
I'm trying to get a tree control working in J9. I just used one of the
snippets from the site and modified it slightly, but I just can't get it to
run. I'm running loads of other widgets and I am gradually building up my
application, but for the life of me I cannot get Tree or Scale controls to
load in J9.
I did manage to get the tree code running under Creme, but not J9 as yet.
255#"\Program
Files\J9\PPRO10\bin\j9w.exe" -jcl:ppro10:loadlibrary=swt-win32-3063 -cp "\My
Documents\testjava\testtree.jar;\Program Files\j9\ppro10\lib\3063\swt.jar"
TestTree
I've also tried build 3116 but to no avail.
Also - it would be nice to have some output from J9 as to what is happening.
Creme provides a simple log file of standard output, can J9 do the same? I
am using Eclipse as my IDE, but have not tried any of the tools or the IDE
in the WSDD kit. Maybe there is a debug tool for monitoring J9 from the
desktop?
thanks,
Andy
here is the code i was testing...
public static void main (String [] args) {
Display display = new Display ();
Shell shell = new Shell (display,SWT.CLOSE);
shell.setLayout(new FillLayout());
Tree tree = new Tree (shell,SWT.SINGLE);
for (int i=0; i<4; i++) {
TreeItem iItem = new TreeItem (tree, 0);
iItem.setText ("TreeItem (0) -" + i);
for (int j=0; j<4; j++) {
TreeItem jItem = new TreeItem (iItem, 0);
jItem.setText ("TreeItem (1) -" + j);
}
}
shell.open ();
while (!shell.isDisposed()) {
if (!display.readAndDispatch ()) display.sleep ();
}
display.dispose ();
}
|
|
| | |
| Re: pocket pc, J9 - Tree [message #450016 is a reply to message #450004] |
Fri, 04 February 2005 13:48  |
Stef van Dijk
Messages: 31
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
"Christophe Cornu" <christophe_cornu@ca.ibm.com> wrote in message
news:ctu808$ppu$1@www.eclipse.org...
> One gratuitous guess: maybe you are catching another swt.jar from one jcl
> profile which does not contain the Tree widget. But paste back the output
of
> the console if things are still confusing.
Good guess I'd say. PersonalProfile contains a subset of SWT classes which
does not include the Tree widget. By using the jcl:ppro10 tag, you have put
the PPro jar (containing the SWT classes) in the bootclasspath ahead of the
SWT jar you added to the classpath. Thus, that jar will go largely, if not
totally, unused.
So one question is, are you really trying to use PersonalProfile (ie, AWT)
as well as SWT? If not, then try using Foundation instead (jcl:foun10). If
you are, well this is probably going to be a very problematic (and
unsupported) arrangement.
Stef
|
|
| |
| Re: pocket pc, J9 - Tree [message #450027 is a reply to message #450016] |
Sun, 06 February 2005 16:14 |
No real name
Messages: 92
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
thanks for that Stef.
Most of the stuff I've read so far is considering either CDC or CLDC, but
within CDC I had not considered the impact of either Personal vs Foundation
profiles. Looking at my reference book you are right and since SWT is the
GUI I have no need for AWT.
I've just got the default install of "personal profile" from the WEME. Can't
see the foundation profile and I'm getting an error. I'll have a dig around
and try to work out where I can obtain the foundation profile - the choices
I had from the WEME installer were either MIDP 2.0 or Personal Profile 1.0.
I'm guessing all I need is another dll file, maybe jclfoun10_22.dll or
something like that?
Andy
"Stef van Dijk" <not-me@not-here.com> wrote in message
news:ctvufh$8i9$1@www.eclipse.org...
> "Christophe Cornu" <christophe_cornu@ca.ibm.com> wrote in message
> news:ctu808$ppu$1@www.eclipse.org...
> > One gratuitous guess: maybe you are catching another swt.jar from one
jcl
> > profile which does not contain the Tree widget. But paste back the
output
> of
> > the console if things are still confusing.
>
> Good guess I'd say. PersonalProfile contains a subset of SWT classes which
> does not include the Tree widget. By using the jcl:ppro10 tag, you have
put
> the PPro jar (containing the SWT classes) in the bootclasspath ahead of
the
> SWT jar you added to the classpath. Thus, that jar will go largely, if not
> totally, unused.
> So one question is, are you really trying to use PersonalProfile (ie, AWT)
> as well as SWT? If not, then try using Foundation instead (jcl:foun10). If
> you are, well this is probably going to be a very problematic (and
> unsupported) arrangement.
>
> Stef
>
>
|
|
| | |
| Re: pocket pc, J9 - Tree [message #450275 is a reply to message #450064] |
Wed, 09 February 2005 11:16 |
No real name
Messages: 92
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
Thanks for your help Stef. I posted the question on the DeviceDeveloper
newsgroup a few days ago, but it doesn't seem to be very active.
I'm surprised nobody else has found this problem, so maybe I have missed
something, I'm not sure. I might just delete the swt class files from the
ppro-ui.jar. It's a bit of a hack but that might work. I don't know why IBM
don't ship SWT packages with J9 in their original format, at least that way
you can upgrade them easily.
Andy
"Stef van Dijk" <not-me@not-here.com> wrote in message
news:cu7ski$cc5$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Foundation is most certainly available for PPC2003. I had always thought
it
> was "pre-installed" with WEME (on your development machine under an
> ive/runtimes directory or somethign like that) but I'm not as familiar
with
> the tooling side. Your best bet is to probably ask this over on the
> DeviceDeveloper newsgroup. You can find it on server news.software.ibm.com
> as ibm.software.websphere.studio.device-developer. They should be able to
> tell you how to get Foundation installed.
>
> Stef
>
> "Andy Harrison" <andyh@agaricus.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:cu5lj2$9na$1@www.eclipse.org...
> > I've done some digging around and it looks like my j9 setup is a little
> > different to other (older?) versions that I've seen discussed elsewhere.
> See
> > attached file. I've got the latest 5.7.1 version from the IBM site.
> >
> > I installed both MIDP 2.0 and PPRO 1.0, but have only been using ppro10.
> If
> > I try the -jcl:foun10 switch, then there should be a folder called
> jclfoun10
> > under the lib directory maybe?
> >
> > There seems to be very little info on this. The only think I can think
of
> is
> > to drop the org.eclipse.swt packages from the ppro-ui.jar file, so maybe
> > then my swt.jar will be used as intended? The installation notes only
say
> > this:
> >
> > The possible library arguments are:
> > -jcl:foun10 (jclFoundation10 class library)
> > -jcl:ppro10 (jclPPro10 class library)
> > -jcl:midp20 (jclMidp2.0 class library)
> > -jcl:max (jclMax class library)
> > -jcl:rm (jclRM class library)
> > Note: Not all these options are available for all platforms.
> >
> > Not available on mine it would seem (PPC2003, dell axim) any insights?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Andy
> >
> >
> > > I've just got the default install of "personal profile" from the WEME.
> > Can't
> > > see the foundation profile and I'm getting an error. I'll have a dig
> > around
> > > and try to work out where I can obtain the foundation profile - the
> > choices
> > > I had from the WEME installer were either MIDP 2.0 or Personal Profile
> > 1.0.
> > > I'm guessing all I need is another dll file, maybe jclfoun10_22.dll or
> > > something like that?
> >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: pocket pc, J9 - Tree [message #450278 is a reply to message #450275] |
Wed, 09 February 2005 14:10 |
Stef van Dijk
Messages: 31
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
Yeah, I saw your post and I'm surprised no one responded. We're usually
fairly helpful over there. ;-)
Let me see if I can dig up an installable and figure out where Foundation is
for you.
Rather than hack the PPro jar (since you don't need AWT either), try
overriding the bootclasspath by using the following:
-Xbootclasspath={pathToPPro}/classes.zip;{pathToPPro}/locale .zip;{pathToL
ib}/charconv.zip
This will do all the same things as the -jcl:ppro10 setting except include
the ppro-ui.jar. You'll still want to use the -jcl:ppro10 option though so
the VM doesn't try to default you to something else, though again, the
override should get you the right jars.
While this gets you something very close to Foundation, it's obviously not
the best answer. But it should get you going until I can figure out where
you can find Foundation.
Stef
"Andy Harrison" <andyh@agaricus.co.uk> wrote in message
news:cucs5j$2n4$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Thanks for your help Stef. I posted the question on the DeviceDeveloper
> newsgroup a few days ago, but it doesn't seem to be very active.
>
> I'm surprised nobody else has found this problem, so maybe I have missed
> something, I'm not sure. I might just delete the swt class files from the
> ppro-ui.jar. It's a bit of a hack but that might work. I don't know why
IBM
> don't ship SWT packages with J9 in their original format, at least that
way
> you can upgrade them easily.
>
> Andy
>
>
> "Stef van Dijk" <not-me@not-here.com> wrote in message
> news:cu7ski$cc5$1@www.eclipse.org...
> > Foundation is most certainly available for PPC2003. I had always thought
> it
> > was "pre-installed" with WEME (on your development machine under an
> > ive/runtimes directory or somethign like that) but I'm not as familiar
> with
> > the tooling side. Your best bet is to probably ask this over on the
> > DeviceDeveloper newsgroup. You can find it on server
news.software.ibm.com
> > as ibm.software.websphere.studio.device-developer. They should be able
to
> > tell you how to get Foundation installed.
> >
> > Stef
> >
> > "Andy Harrison" <andyh@agaricus.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:cu5lj2$9na$1@www.eclipse.org...
> > > I've done some digging around and it looks like my j9 setup is a
little
> > > different to other (older?) versions that I've seen discussed
elsewhere.
> > See
> > > attached file. I've got the latest 5.7.1 version from the IBM site.
> > >
> > > I installed both MIDP 2.0 and PPRO 1.0, but have only been using
ppro10.
> > If
> > > I try the -jcl:foun10 switch, then there should be a folder called
> > jclfoun10
> > > under the lib directory maybe?
> > >
> > > There seems to be very little info on this. The only think I can think
> of
> > is
> > > to drop the org.eclipse.swt packages from the ppro-ui.jar file, so
maybe
> > > then my swt.jar will be used as intended? The installation notes only
> say
> > > this:
> > >
> > > The possible library arguments are:
> > > -jcl:foun10 (jclFoundation10 class library)
> > > -jcl:ppro10 (jclPPro10 class library)
> > > -jcl:midp20 (jclMidp2.0 class library)
> > > -jcl:max (jclMax class library)
> > > -jcl:rm (jclRM class library)
> > > Note: Not all these options are available for all platforms.
> > >
> > > Not available on mine it would seem (PPC2003, dell axim) any insights?
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > Andy
> > >
> > >
> > > > I've just got the default install of "personal profile" from the
WEME.
> > > Can't
> > > > see the foundation profile and I'm getting an error. I'll have a dig
> > > around
> > > > and try to work out where I can obtain the foundation profile - the
> > > choices
> > > > I had from the WEME installer were either MIDP 2.0 or Personal
Profile
> > > 1.0.
> > > > I'm guessing all I need is another dll file, maybe jclfoun10_22.dll
or
> > > > something like that?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: pocket pc, J9 - Tree [message #450279 is a reply to message #450278] |
Wed, 09 February 2005 14:14 |
Stef van Dijk
Messages: 31
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
BTW, you can point at where you got WEME from? I may as well get exactly
what you got or we might continue going round and round on this. Did you
maybe only get the LPPs (runtimes) and not the dev environment? It's
probably true that there's no Foundation LPP.
Stef
"Stef van Dijk" <not-me@not-here.com> wrote in message
news:cud5lh$egg$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Yeah, I saw your post and I'm surprised no one responded. We're usually
> fairly helpful over there. ;-)
> Let me see if I can dig up an installable and figure out where Foundation
is
> for you.
> Rather than hack the PPro jar (since you don't need AWT either), try
> overriding the bootclasspath by using the following:
> -Xbootclasspath={pathToPPro}/classes.zip;{pathToPPro}/locale .zip;{pathT
oL
> ib}/charconv.zip
> This will do all the same things as the -jcl:ppro10 setting except include
> the ppro-ui.jar. You'll still want to use the -jcl:ppro10 option though so
> the VM doesn't try to default you to something else, though again, the
> override should get you the right jars.
> While this gets you something very close to Foundation, it's obviously not
> the best answer. But it should get you going until I can figure out where
> you can find Foundation.
>
> Stef
>
> "Andy Harrison" <andyh@agaricus.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:cucs5j$2n4$1@www.eclipse.org...
> > Thanks for your help Stef. I posted the question on the DeviceDeveloper
> > newsgroup a few days ago, but it doesn't seem to be very active.
> >
> > I'm surprised nobody else has found this problem, so maybe I have missed
> > something, I'm not sure. I might just delete the swt class files from
the
> > ppro-ui.jar. It's a bit of a hack but that might work. I don't know why
> IBM
> > don't ship SWT packages with J9 in their original format, at least that
> way
> > you can upgrade them easily.
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
> > "Stef van Dijk" <not-me@not-here.com> wrote in message
> > news:cu7ski$cc5$1@www.eclipse.org...
> > > Foundation is most certainly available for PPC2003. I had always
thought
> > it
> > > was "pre-installed" with WEME (on your development machine under an
> > > ive/runtimes directory or somethign like that) but I'm not as familiar
> > with
> > > the tooling side. Your best bet is to probably ask this over on the
> > > DeviceDeveloper newsgroup. You can find it on server
> news.software.ibm.com
> > > as ibm.software.websphere.studio.device-developer. They should be able
> to
> > > tell you how to get Foundation installed.
> > >
> > > Stef
> > >
> > > "Andy Harrison" <andyh@agaricus.co.uk> wrote in message
> > > news:cu5lj2$9na$1@www.eclipse.org...
> > > > I've done some digging around and it looks like my j9 setup is a
> little
> > > > different to other (older?) versions that I've seen discussed
> elsewhere.
> > > See
> > > > attached file. I've got the latest 5.7.1 version from the IBM site.
> > > >
> > > > I installed both MIDP 2.0 and PPRO 1.0, but have only been using
> ppro10.
> > > If
> > > > I try the -jcl:foun10 switch, then there should be a folder called
> > > jclfoun10
> > > > under the lib directory maybe?
> > > >
> > > > There seems to be very little info on this. The only think I can
think
> > of
> > > is
> > > > to drop the org.eclipse.swt packages from the ppro-ui.jar file, so
> maybe
> > > > then my swt.jar will be used as intended? The installation notes
only
> > say
> > > > this:
> > > >
> > > > The possible library arguments are:
> > > > -jcl:foun10 (jclFoundation10 class library)
> > > > -jcl:ppro10 (jclPPro10 class library)
> > > > -jcl:midp20 (jclMidp2.0 class library)
> > > > -jcl:max (jclMax class library)
> > > > -jcl:rm (jclRM class library)
> > > > Note: Not all these options are available for all platforms.
> > > >
> > > > Not available on mine it would seem (PPC2003, dell axim) any
insights?
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > > Andy
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I've just got the default install of "personal profile" from the
> WEME.
> > > > Can't
> > > > > see the foundation profile and I'm getting an error. I'll have a
dig
> > > > around
> > > > > and try to work out where I can obtain the foundation profile -
the
> > > > choices
> > > > > I had from the WEME installer were either MIDP 2.0 or Personal
> Profile
> > > > 1.0.
> > > > > I'm guessing all I need is another dll file, maybe
jclfoun10_22.dll
> or
> > > > > something like that?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
| | |
| Re: pocket pc, J9 - Tree [message #450289 is a reply to message #450285] |
Wed, 09 February 2005 16:51 |
Stef van Dijk
Messages: 31
Registered: July 2009 |
Member |
|
|
Actually, you're going to have to shorten that. Shortcuts can't exceed 255
(or 256?) characters in length. The problem you're having now is probably
because the command was truncated and it never saw your -jcl option.
Of course the only way to shorten it is to redo the directory structure
where you have the j9 libs. :-(
Stef
"Andy Harrison" <andyh@agaricus.co.uk> wrote in message
news:cuda8f$60v$1@www.eclipse.org...
> -Xbootclasspath stuff
> Didn't work for me, but the arguments you told me to supply seemed to
cause
> J9 to look for the foundation module...
>
> (W)J9VM0011 Unable to load jclfoun10_22: The specified module could not be
> found.
>
> (E)EXEX0013 Internal VM error: Failed to create Java VM
>
> (I)EXEX0014 Run \Program Files\J9\PPRO10\bin\j9.exe -help for usage
>
> So it didn't load, but we did manage to create one of the longest
> "shortcuts" ever written...
>
> 347#"\Program Files\J9\PPRO10\bin\j9.exe" -Xbootclasspath="\Program
> Files\J9\PPRO10\lib\jclPPro10\classes.zip;\Program
> Files\J9\PPRO10\lib\jclPPro10\locale.zip;\Program
>
Files\J9\PPRO10\lib\jclPPro10\ext\charconv_en.zip" -jcl:ppro10:loadlibrary=s
> wt-win32-3063 -cp "\My Documents\testjava\testtree.jar;\Program
> Files\j9\ppro10\lib\3063\swt.jar" TestTree
>
> can any readers beat this?
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> "Andy Harrison" <andyh@agaricus.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:cud883$r3c$1@www.eclipse.org...
> > I got J9 on a CDROM image, it came as a zip file rather than an iso
> > called:
> >
> > "IBM Workplace Client Technology, Micro Edition"
> >
> > I just chose the link ...
> >
> > "Install Websphere Everyplace Micro Environment Personal Profile 1.0 for
> > Windows Mobile 2003"
> >
> > ... when the cd launches.
> >
> > Version is 5.7.1
> >
>
http://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/download/product.jsp?s= p&id=DVDE-634P22
> >
> > try that!
> >
> > Maybe I have to install the full WSDD to get access to the foundation
> > profile? I'm sure WSDD is great, but I'm just getting along fine with
> > Eclipse.
> >
> > Meantime, I'll try those changes to the bootstrap.
> >
> > thanks for your help!
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
> >
> > "Stef van Dijk" <not-me@not-here.com> wrote in message
> > news:cud5sn$fk4$1@www.eclipse.org...
> > > BTW, you can point at where you got WEME from? I may as well get
exactly
> > > what you got or we might continue going round and round on this. Did
you
> > > maybe only get the LPPs (runtimes) and not the dev environment? It's
> > > probably true that there's no Foundation LPP.
> > >
> > > Stef
> > >
>
>
|
|
| | |
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri May 03 22:55:03 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.04001 seconds |
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
