|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Standalone SWT/JFace application packaging, essential jars [message #449275 is a reply to message #449222] |
Wed, 19 January 2005 20:07  |
Eclipse User |
|
|
|
"SWT/JFace in Action". I just ran into the point where the authors add
osgi.jar. I will follow your recomendation though and update the README
in my app and the variables in the eclipse project.
Thanks
-H
Chris wrote:
> boot.jar is empty now. Adding workbench.jar won't hurt you but is not
> necessary.
>
> The lack of the osgi.jar should be problematic. Its possible you just
> haven't any JFace that references the osgiclasses. I don't know what book
> you are using but it may be referring to 2.1 not 3.0.
>
> -Chris
>
> "Hugo A. Garcia" <hugo.a.garcia@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:cslegs$pko$1@www.eclipse.org...
>
>>Interesting. I am learning from a book and it uses the following:
>>
>>swt.jar
>>runtime.jar
>>boot.jar
>>workbench.jar
>>
>>Both list work. Why?
>>
>>-H
>>
>>Chris wrote:
>>
>>>Now:
>>>swt.jar
>>>jface.jar
>>>runtime.jar
>>>osgi.jar
>>>
>>>If 49497 comes to fruition it would be:
>>>swt.jar
>>>jface.jar
>>>utility.jar
>>>
>>>-Chris
>>>
>>>"Hugo A. Garcia" <hugo.a.garcia@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:cshoeh$8ru$1@www.eclipse.org...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi
>>>>
>>>>I came accross https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=49497 and it
>>>>is a work in progress I am interested in. But until that work in progress
>>>>is complete, I really need to now the essential jars that are needed in
>>>>order to package an independent app that uses SWT/JFace. These jars would
>>>>reside in the /lib of the app I would like to distribute. This way once
>>>>the above mentioned work is complete then I can just update the /lib.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks
>>>>
>>>>-H
>>>
>>>
>
|
|
|
Powered by
FUDForum. Page generated in 0.41348 seconds