Skip to main content


Eclipse Community Forums
Forum Search:

Search      Help    Register    Login    Home
Home » Eclipse Projects » Standard Widget Toolkit (SWT) » Standalone SWT/JFace application packaging, essential jars
Standalone SWT/JFace application packaging, essential jars [message #449080] Tue, 18 January 2005 01:22 Go to next message
Hugo A. Garcia is currently offline Hugo A. GarciaFriend
Messages: 258
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Hi

I came accross https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=49497 and
it is a work in progress I am interested in. But until that work in
progress is complete, I really need to now the essential jars that are
needed in order to package an independent app that uses SWT/JFace. These
jars would reside in the /lib of the app I would like to distribute.
This way once the above mentioned work is complete then I can just
update the /lib.

Thanks

-H
Re: Standalone SWT/JFace application packaging, essential jars [message #449101 is a reply to message #449080] Tue, 18 January 2005 14:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Chris Gross is currently offline Chris GrossFriend
Messages: 471
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Now:
swt.jar
jface.jar
runtime.jar
osgi.jar

If 49497 comes to fruition it would be:
swt.jar
jface.jar
utility.jar

-Chris

"Hugo A. Garcia" <hugo.a.garcia@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cshoeh$8ru$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Hi
>
> I came accross https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=49497 and it
> is a work in progress I am interested in. But until that work in progress
> is complete, I really need to now the essential jars that are needed in
> order to package an independent app that uses SWT/JFace. These jars would
> reside in the /lib of the app I would like to distribute. This way once
> the above mentioned work is complete then I can just update the /lib.
>
> Thanks
>
> -H
Re: Standalone SWT/JFace application packaging, essential jars [message #449200 is a reply to message #449101] Wed, 19 January 2005 10:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Hugo A. Garcia is currently offline Hugo A. GarciaFriend
Messages: 258
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Interesting. I am learning from a book and it uses the following:

swt.jar
runtime.jar
boot.jar
workbench.jar

Both list work. Why?

-H

Chris wrote:
> Now:
> swt.jar
> jface.jar
> runtime.jar
> osgi.jar
>
> If 49497 comes to fruition it would be:
> swt.jar
> jface.jar
> utility.jar
>
> -Chris
>
> "Hugo A. Garcia" <hugo.a.garcia@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:cshoeh$8ru$1@www.eclipse.org...
>
>>Hi
>>
>>I came accross https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=49497 and it
>>is a work in progress I am interested in. But until that work in progress
>>is complete, I really need to now the essential jars that are needed in
>>order to package an independent app that uses SWT/JFace. These jars would
>>reside in the /lib of the app I would like to distribute. This way once
>>the above mentioned work is complete then I can just update the /lib.
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>-H
>
>
>
Re: Standalone SWT/JFace application packaging, essential jars [message #449201 is a reply to message #449101] Wed, 19 January 2005 11:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Benjamin Pasero is currently offline Benjamin PaseroFriend
Messages: 337
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Chris wrote:
> Now:
> swt.jar
> jface.jar
> runtime.jar
> osgi.jar
>
> If 49497 comes to fruition it would be:
> swt.jar
> jface.jar
> utility.jar

Hi Chris,

once you have finnished work on that issue, will it be possible to download
JFace and Utility from Eclipse.org download section?

Regards,
Ben

>
> -Chris
>
> "Hugo A. Garcia" <hugo.a.garcia@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:cshoeh$8ru$1@www.eclipse.org...
>
>>Hi
>>
>>I came accross https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=49497 and it
>>is a work in progress I am interested in. But until that work in progress
>>is complete, I really need to now the essential jars that are needed in
>>order to package an independent app that uses SWT/JFace. These jars would
>>reside in the /lib of the app I would like to distribute. This way once
>>the above mentioned work is complete then I can just update the /lib.
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>-H
>
>
>
Re: Standalone SWT/JFace application packaging, essential jars [message #449222 is a reply to message #449200] Wed, 19 January 2005 20:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Chris Gross is currently offline Chris GrossFriend
Messages: 471
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
boot.jar is empty now. Adding workbench.jar won't hurt you but is not
necessary.

The lack of the osgi.jar should be problematic. Its possible you just
haven't any JFace that references the osgiclasses. I don't know what book
you are using but it may be referring to 2.1 not 3.0.

-Chris

"Hugo A. Garcia" <hugo.a.garcia@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cslegs$pko$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Interesting. I am learning from a book and it uses the following:
>
> swt.jar
> runtime.jar
> boot.jar
> workbench.jar
>
> Both list work. Why?
>
> -H
>
> Chris wrote:
>> Now:
>> swt.jar
>> jface.jar
>> runtime.jar
>> osgi.jar
>>
>> If 49497 comes to fruition it would be:
>> swt.jar
>> jface.jar
>> utility.jar
>>
>> -Chris
>>
>> "Hugo A. Garcia" <hugo.a.garcia@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:cshoeh$8ru$1@www.eclipse.org...
>>
>>>Hi
>>>
>>>I came accross https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=49497 and it
>>>is a work in progress I am interested in. But until that work in progress
>>>is complete, I really need to now the essential jars that are needed in
>>>order to package an independent app that uses SWT/JFace. These jars would
>>>reside in the /lib of the app I would like to distribute. This way once
>>>the above mentioned work is complete then I can just update the /lib.
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>
>>>-H
>>
>>
Re: Standalone SWT/JFace application packaging, essential jars [message #449223 is a reply to message #449201] Wed, 19 January 2005 20:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Chris Gross is currently offline Chris GrossFriend
Messages: 471
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
I don't know. There is some discussion of that in the bugzilla issue.
Thats basically out of my control. I'm just the extra help, submitting
patches.

I could send you the versions I created and tested with if you were
interested.

-Chris

"Benjamin Pasero" <bpasero@rssowl.org> wrote in message
news:cslets$qm6$1@www.eclipse.org...
> Chris wrote:
>> Now:
>> swt.jar
>> jface.jar
>> runtime.jar
>> osgi.jar
>>
>> If 49497 comes to fruition it would be:
>> swt.jar
>> jface.jar
>> utility.jar
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> once you have finnished work on that issue, will it be possible to
> download JFace and Utility from Eclipse.org download section?
>
> Regards,
> Ben
>
>>
>> -Chris
>>
>> "Hugo A. Garcia" <hugo.a.garcia@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:cshoeh$8ru$1@www.eclipse.org...
>>
>>>Hi
>>>
>>>I came accross https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=49497 and it
>>>is a work in progress I am interested in. But until that work in progress
>>>is complete, I really need to now the essential jars that are needed in
>>>order to package an independent app that uses SWT/JFace. These jars would
>>>reside in the /lib of the app I would like to distribute. This way once
>>>the above mentioned work is complete then I can just update the /lib.
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>
>>>-H
>>
>>
Re: Standalone SWT/JFace application packaging, essential jars [message #449267 is a reply to message #449223] Wed, 19 January 2005 21:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Benjamin Pasero is currently offline Benjamin PaseroFriend
Messages: 337
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Thanks, but currently I am not having any time testing / using JFace due to my
studies. In mid februar I will download a version (or ask you for one via mail)
and have a look. Good work :)

Regards,
Ben


> I don't know. There is some discussion of that in the bugzilla issue.
> Thats basically out of my control. I'm just the extra help, submitting
> patches.
>
> I could send you the versions I created and tested with if you were
> interested.
>
> -Chris
>
> "Benjamin Pasero" <bpasero@rssowl.org> wrote in message
> news:cslets$qm6$1@www.eclipse.org...
>
>>Chris wrote:
>>
>>>Now:
>>>swt.jar
>>>jface.jar
>>>runtime.jar
>>>osgi.jar
>>>
>>>If 49497 comes to fruition it would be:
>>>swt.jar
>>>jface.jar
>>>utility.jar
>>
>>Hi Chris,
>>
>>once you have finnished work on that issue, will it be possible to
>>download JFace and Utility from Eclipse.org download section?
>>
>>Regards,
>>Ben
>>
>>
>>>-Chris
>>>
>>>"Hugo A. Garcia" <hugo.a.garcia@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:cshoeh$8ru$1@www.eclipse.org...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi
>>>>
>>>>I came accross https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=49497 and it
>>>>is a work in progress I am interested in. But until that work in progress
>>>>is complete, I really need to now the essential jars that are needed in
>>>>order to package an independent app that uses SWT/JFace. These jars would
>>>>reside in the /lib of the app I would like to distribute. This way once
>>>>the above mentioned work is complete then I can just update the /lib.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks
>>>>
>>>>-H
>>>
>>>
>
Re: Standalone SWT/JFace application packaging, essential jars [message #449275 is a reply to message #449222] Thu, 20 January 2005 01:07 Go to previous message
Hugo A. Garcia is currently offline Hugo A. GarciaFriend
Messages: 258
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
"SWT/JFace in Action". I just ran into the point where the authors add
osgi.jar. I will follow your recomendation though and update the README
in my app and the variables in the eclipse project.

Thanks

-H

Chris wrote:
> boot.jar is empty now. Adding workbench.jar won't hurt you but is not
> necessary.
>
> The lack of the osgi.jar should be problematic. Its possible you just
> haven't any JFace that references the osgiclasses. I don't know what book
> you are using but it may be referring to 2.1 not 3.0.
>
> -Chris
>
> "Hugo A. Garcia" <hugo.a.garcia@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:cslegs$pko$1@www.eclipse.org...
>
>>Interesting. I am learning from a book and it uses the following:
>>
>>swt.jar
>>runtime.jar
>>boot.jar
>>workbench.jar
>>
>>Both list work. Why?
>>
>>-H
>>
>>Chris wrote:
>>
>>>Now:
>>>swt.jar
>>>jface.jar
>>>runtime.jar
>>>osgi.jar
>>>
>>>If 49497 comes to fruition it would be:
>>>swt.jar
>>>jface.jar
>>>utility.jar
>>>
>>>-Chris
>>>
>>>"Hugo A. Garcia" <hugo.a.garcia@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:cshoeh$8ru$1@www.eclipse.org...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi
>>>>
>>>>I came accross https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=49497 and it
>>>>is a work in progress I am interested in. But until that work in progress
>>>>is complete, I really need to now the essential jars that are needed in
>>>>order to package an independent app that uses SWT/JFace. These jars would
>>>>reside in the /lib of the app I would like to distribute. This way once
>>>>the above mentioned work is complete then I can just update the /lib.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks
>>>>
>>>>-H
>>>
>>>
>
Previous Topic:Table margins always white???
Next Topic:Jvm is always crashed when I get the property of a activex using swt.
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Nov 16 21:44:10 GMT 2019

Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.01692 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.2.
Copyright ©2001-2010 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software

Back to the top