Home » Eclipse Projects » Dali » Dali integration into WTP Plan?
| |
Re: Dali integration into WTP Plan? [message #434280 is a reply to message #434044] |
Fri, 24 November 2006 16:26 |
Ali Murtaza Manji Messages: 11 Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
thx Neil, just saw WTP 2.0 M3 driver, Dali stuff still seems omitted?
Any updates?
Neil Hauge wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Is it safe to assume the Dali stuff didn't make it into WTP 2.0 M2?
>
> That's correct. There isn't any Dali code in the WTP 2.0 M2.
>
>> Any ideas what the latest plan is for Dali integration into WTP?
>
> I made a recent change to our 1.0 milestone plan
> (http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Dali_1.0_planning) that added WTP 2.0
> M3 as our target for WTP build integration. I have to mention though
> that we are re-architecting Dali currently in order to support the
> orm.xml descriptor, as well as achieve greater extensibility, including
> the use of Facets and the new DTP project for DB connectivity.
> So, in short, the Dali code is going through a lot of changes and
> therefore the functionality in the M3 build will be somewhat limited.
> The functionality will be broader and more integrated, but will not yet
> have a lot of the functionality from the 0.5 release. All of this is
> part of an effort to have a more complete set of features, in addition
> to an extensible base from which to build off of for our 1.0 (WTP 2.0)
> release.
> Neil
>
>
>
> Ali Manji wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>
>> Is it safe to assume the Dali stuff didn't make it into WTP 2.0 M2?
>> Any ideas what the latest plan is for Dali integration into WTP?
>
>
|
|
|
Re: Dali integration into WTP Plan? [message #434281 is a reply to message #434280] |
Mon, 27 November 2006 22:36 |
Neil Hauge Messages: 475 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Ali,
For M3, our plugins are not actually located in the driver, but are built
along with the driver (in the same build), but as a distribution that is
downloaded separately. For M3, if you scroll to the bottom of the
download page -
http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/S- 2.0M3-200611170109/
- you will see the JPA download section.
Our plugins will eventually be merged with the main driver, probably in
the January or February timeframe. So we are now a part of the WTP 2.0
build, but our output is simply available as a separate download.
Also note that the WTP 2.0 M3 driver only includes the Dali 1.0 core
(model) plugins, but not the UI or test plugins. We managed to get the
core successfully into the M3 build, but were unable to get the entire set
of plugins in by the necessary date. The full set of plugins will be
available in M4.
Neil
Ali Manji wrote:
> thx Neil, just saw WTP 2.0 M3 driver, Dali stuff still seems omitted?
> Any updates?
> Neil Hauge wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Is it safe to assume the Dali stuff didn't make it into WTP 2.0 M2?
>>
>> That's correct. There isn't any Dali code in the WTP 2.0 M2.
>>
>>> Any ideas what the latest plan is for Dali integration into WTP?
>>
>> I made a recent change to our 1.0 milestone plan
>> (http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Dali_1.0_planning) that added WTP 2.0
>> M3 as our target for WTP build integration. I have to mention though
>> that we are re-architecting Dali currently in order to support the
>> orm.xml descriptor, as well as achieve greater extensibility, including
>> the use of Facets and the new DTP project for DB connectivity.
>> So, in short, the Dali code is going through a lot of changes and
>> therefore the functionality in the M3 build will be somewhat limited.
>> The functionality will be broader and more integrated, but will not yet
>> have a lot of the functionality from the 0.5 release. All of this is
>> part of an effort to have a more complete set of features, in addition
>> to an extensible base from which to build off of for our 1.0 (WTP 2.0)
>> release.
>> Neil
>>
>>
>>
>> Ali Manji wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Folks,
>>
>>> Is it safe to assume the Dali stuff didn't make it into WTP 2.0 M2?
>>> Any ideas what the latest plan is for Dali integration into WTP?
>>
>>
|
|
| |
Re: Dali integration into WTP Plan? [message #591026 is a reply to message #434044] |
Fri, 24 November 2006 16:26 |
Ali Murtaza Manji Messages: 11 Registered: July 2009 |
Junior Member |
|
|
thx Neil, just saw WTP 2.0 M3 driver, Dali stuff still seems omitted?
Any updates?
Neil Hauge wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Is it safe to assume the Dali stuff didn't make it into WTP 2.0 M2?
>
> That's correct. There isn't any Dali code in the WTP 2.0 M2.
>
>> Any ideas what the latest plan is for Dali integration into WTP?
>
> I made a recent change to our 1.0 milestone plan
> (http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Dali_1.0_planning) that added WTP 2.0
> M3 as our target for WTP build integration. I have to mention though
> that we are re-architecting Dali currently in order to support the
> orm.xml descriptor, as well as achieve greater extensibility, including
> the use of Facets and the new DTP project for DB connectivity.
> So, in short, the Dali code is going through a lot of changes and
> therefore the functionality in the M3 build will be somewhat limited.
> The functionality will be broader and more integrated, but will not yet
> have a lot of the functionality from the 0.5 release. All of this is
> part of an effort to have a more complete set of features, in addition
> to an extensible base from which to build off of for our 1.0 (WTP 2.0)
> release.
> Neil
>
>
>
> Ali Manji wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>
>> Is it safe to assume the Dali stuff didn't make it into WTP 2.0 M2?
>> Any ideas what the latest plan is for Dali integration into WTP?
>
>
|
|
|
Re: Dali integration into WTP Plan? [message #591033 is a reply to message #434280] |
Mon, 27 November 2006 22:36 |
Neil Hauge Messages: 475 Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Ali,
For M3, our plugins are not actually located in the driver, but are built
along with the driver (in the same build), but as a distribution that is
downloaded separately. For M3, if you scroll to the bottom of the
download page -
http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/downloads/drops/R2.0/S- 2.0M3-200611170109/
- you will see the JPA download section.
Our plugins will eventually be merged with the main driver, probably in
the January or February timeframe. So we are now a part of the WTP 2.0
build, but our output is simply available as a separate download.
Also note that the WTP 2.0 M3 driver only includes the Dali 1.0 core
(model) plugins, but not the UI or test plugins. We managed to get the
core successfully into the M3 build, but were unable to get the entire set
of plugins in by the necessary date. The full set of plugins will be
available in M4.
Neil
Ali Manji wrote:
> thx Neil, just saw WTP 2.0 M3 driver, Dali stuff still seems omitted?
> Any updates?
> Neil Hauge wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Is it safe to assume the Dali stuff didn't make it into WTP 2.0 M2?
>>
>> That's correct. There isn't any Dali code in the WTP 2.0 M2.
>>
>>> Any ideas what the latest plan is for Dali integration into WTP?
>>
>> I made a recent change to our 1.0 milestone plan
>> (http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Dali_1.0_planning) that added WTP 2.0
>> M3 as our target for WTP build integration. I have to mention though
>> that we are re-architecting Dali currently in order to support the
>> orm.xml descriptor, as well as achieve greater extensibility, including
>> the use of Facets and the new DTP project for DB connectivity.
>> So, in short, the Dali code is going through a lot of changes and
>> therefore the functionality in the M3 build will be somewhat limited.
>> The functionality will be broader and more integrated, but will not yet
>> have a lot of the functionality from the 0.5 release. All of this is
>> part of an effort to have a more complete set of features, in addition
>> to an extensible base from which to build off of for our 1.0 (WTP 2.0)
>> release.
>> Neil
>>
>>
>>
>> Ali Manji wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Folks,
>>
>>> Is it safe to assume the Dali stuff didn't make it into WTP 2.0 M2?
>>> Any ideas what the latest plan is for Dali integration into WTP?
>>
>>
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Apr 26 08:13:44 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.03993 seconds
|