Home » Modeling » EMF » DynamicEObjectImpl.basicSet?
| |
| Re: DynamicEObjectImpl.basicSet? [message #428002 is a reply to message #428000] |
Mon, 09 March 2009 16:11   |
 Martin Taal
Messages: 5468
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Ed,
Yes I see the basicSetAuthor, but which method on DynamicEObjectImpl would correspond to it?
Some background: I am only using DynamicEObjectImpl's and I am converting a structure of non-eobjects to
DynamicEObjectImpl. This conversion is easier if there are no bidirectional things happening, i.e. the conversion takes
care of setting both sides of a bidirectional association.
Would DynamicEObjectImpl.dynamicSet be a good choice in this case?
As all the feature's are dynamic I guess that eClass.getFeatureId(feature) will give the dynamicfeatureid?
gr. Martin
Ed Merks wrote:
> Martin,
>
> InternalEObject.eInverseAdd/eInverseRemove do the 1/2 updates on the one
> side. See how the generated eInverseAdd/eInverseRemove call
> basicSetAuthor?
>
>
> Martin Taal wrote:
>> Hi Ed,
>> Does DynamicEObjectImpl have something like a basicSet method which
>> does not update the inverse of an association?
>> (for example in the Library example, the BookImpl.basicSetAuthor method)
>>
>>
--
With Regards, Martin Taal
Springsite/Elver.org
Office: Hardwareweg 4, 3821 BV Amersfoort
Postal: Nassaulaan 7, 3941 EC Doorn
The Netherlands
Cell: +31 (0)6 288 48 943
Tel: +31 (0)84 420 2397
Fax: +31 (0)84 225 9307
Mail: mtaal@springsite.com - mtaal@elver.org
Web: www.springsite.com - www.elver.org
|
|
|
| Re: DynamicEObjectImpl.basicSet? [message #428006 is a reply to message #428002] |
Mon, 09 March 2009 16:39 |
Ed Merks
Messages: 33218
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Martin,
Comments below.
Martin Taal wrote:
> Hi Ed,
> Yes I see the basicSetAuthor, but which method on DynamicEObjectImpl
> would correspond to it?
You should never assume any specific Impl will be used, though we do
expect any impl to extend BasicEObjectImpl.
> Some background: I am only using DynamicEObjectImpl's and I am
> converting a structure of non-eobjects to DynamicEObjectImpl. This
> conversion is easier if there are no bidirectional things happening,
> i.e. the conversion takes care of setting both sides of a
> bidirectional association.
>
> Would DynamicEObjectImpl.dynamicSet be a good choice in this case?
No.
> As all the feature's are dynamic I guess that
> eClass.getFeatureId(feature) will give the dynamicfeatureid?
How come you didn't like my eInverseAdd/eInverseRemove answer? I'm
going to stick with that for now. :-P Whatever the answer, it needs to
be in an interface implemented by all modeled objects...
>
> gr. Martin
>
> Ed Merks wrote:
>> Martin,
>>
>> InternalEObject.eInverseAdd/eInverseRemove do the 1/2 updates on the
>> one side. See how the generated eInverseAdd/eInverseRemove call
>> basicSetAuthor?
>>
>>
>> Martin Taal wrote:
>>> Hi Ed,
>>> Does DynamicEObjectImpl have something like a basicSet method which
>>> does not update the inverse of an association?
>>> (for example in the Library example, the BookImpl.basicSetAuthor
>>> method)
>>>
>>>
>
>
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
| Re: DynamicEObjectImpl.basicSet? [message #428010 is a reply to message #428006] |
Mon, 09 March 2009 16:53 |
Martin Taal
Messages: 5468
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Ed,
Ha okay (finally listening to you I think :-), inverseAdd is basically the same as basicSet for a single ereference,
one final question the featureid for this call should be obtained like this:
eClass.getFeatureId(feature)
correct?
or is it feature.getFeatureId() in this case?
gr. Martin
Ed Merks wrote:
> Martin,
>
> Comments below.
>
>
> Martin Taal wrote:
>> Hi Ed,
>> Yes I see the basicSetAuthor, but which method on DynamicEObjectImpl
>> would correspond to it?
> You should never assume any specific Impl will be used, though we do
> expect any impl to extend BasicEObjectImpl.
>> Some background: I am only using DynamicEObjectImpl's and I am
>> converting a structure of non-eobjects to DynamicEObjectImpl. This
>> conversion is easier if there are no bidirectional things happening,
>> i.e. the conversion takes care of setting both sides of a
>> bidirectional association.
>>
>> Would DynamicEObjectImpl.dynamicSet be a good choice in this case?
> No.
>> As all the feature's are dynamic I guess that
>> eClass.getFeatureId(feature) will give the dynamicfeatureid?
> How come you didn't like my eInverseAdd/eInverseRemove answer? I'm
> going to stick with that for now. :-P Whatever the answer, it needs to
> be in an interface implemented by all modeled objects...
>>
>> gr. Martin
>>
>> Ed Merks wrote:
>>> Martin,
>>>
>>> InternalEObject.eInverseAdd/eInverseRemove do the 1/2 updates on the
>>> one side. See how the generated eInverseAdd/eInverseRemove call
>>> basicSetAuthor?
>>>
>>>
>>> Martin Taal wrote:
>>>> Hi Ed,
>>>> Does DynamicEObjectImpl have something like a basicSet method which
>>>> does not update the inverse of an association?
>>>> (for example in the Library example, the BookImpl.basicSetAuthor
>>>> method)
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
--
With Regards, Martin Taal
Springsite/Elver.org
Office: Hardwareweg 4, 3821 BV Amersfoort
Postal: Nassaulaan 7, 3941 EC Doorn
The Netherlands
Cell: +31 (0)6 288 48 943
Tel: +31 (0)84 420 2397
Fax: +31 (0)84 225 9307
Mail: mtaal@springsite.com - mtaal@elver.org
Web: www.springsite.com - www.elver.org
|
|
|
| Re: DynamicEObjectImpl.basicSet? [message #428017 is a reply to message #428010] |
Mon, 09 March 2009 18:08 |
Ed Merks
Messages: 33218
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Martin,
If you use the one specific to the actual class, then you can pass in
null for the other parameter.
Martin Taal wrote:
> Hi Ed,
> Ha okay (finally listening to you I think :-), inverseAdd is basically
> the same as basicSet for a single ereference,
> one final question the featureid for this call should be obtained like
> this:
> eClass.getFeatureId(feature)
>
> correct?
>
> or is it feature.getFeatureId() in this case?
>
> gr. Martin
>
> Ed Merks wrote:
>> Martin,
>>
>> Comments below.
>>
>>
>> Martin Taal wrote:
>>> Hi Ed,
>>> Yes I see the basicSetAuthor, but which method on DynamicEObjectImpl
>>> would correspond to it?
>> You should never assume any specific Impl will be used, though we do
>> expect any impl to extend BasicEObjectImpl.
>>> Some background: I am only using DynamicEObjectImpl's and I am
>>> converting a structure of non-eobjects to DynamicEObjectImpl. This
>>> conversion is easier if there are no bidirectional things happening,
>>> i.e. the conversion takes care of setting both sides of a
>>> bidirectional association.
>>>
>>> Would DynamicEObjectImpl.dynamicSet be a good choice in this case?
>> No.
>>> As all the feature's are dynamic I guess that
>>> eClass.getFeatureId(feature) will give the dynamicfeatureid?
>> How come you didn't like my eInverseAdd/eInverseRemove answer? I'm
>> going to stick with that for now. :-P Whatever the answer, it needs
>> to be in an interface implemented by all modeled objects...
>>>
>>> gr. Martin
>>>
>>> Ed Merks wrote:
>>>> Martin,
>>>>
>>>> InternalEObject.eInverseAdd/eInverseRemove do the 1/2 updates on
>>>> the one side. See how the generated eInverseAdd/eInverseRemove
>>>> call basicSetAuthor?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Martin Taal wrote:
>>>>> Hi Ed,
>>>>> Does DynamicEObjectImpl have something like a basicSet method
>>>>> which does not update the inverse of an association?
>>>>> (for example in the Library example, the BookImpl.basicSetAuthor
>>>>> method)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
| Re: DynamicEObjectImpl.basicSet? [message #428080 is a reply to message #428017] |
Mon, 09 March 2009 18:12 |
Martin Taal
Messages: 5468
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Hmm, I try to match your answer with my question but I do not see a relation... :-)
Which other parameter do you mean?
gr. Martin
Ed Merks wrote:
> Martin,
>
> If you use the one specific to the actual class, then you can pass in
> null for the other parameter.
>
>
> Martin Taal wrote:
>> Hi Ed,
>> Ha okay (finally listening to you I think :-), inverseAdd is basically
>> the same as basicSet for a single ereference,
>> one final question the featureid for this call should be obtained like
>> this:
>> eClass.getFeatureId(feature)
>>
>> correct?
>>
>> or is it feature.getFeatureId() in this case?
>>
>> gr. Martin
>>
>> Ed Merks wrote:
>>> Martin,
>>>
>>> Comments below.
>>>
>>>
>>> Martin Taal wrote:
>>>> Hi Ed,
>>>> Yes I see the basicSetAuthor, but which method on DynamicEObjectImpl
>>>> would correspond to it?
>>> You should never assume any specific Impl will be used, though we do
>>> expect any impl to extend BasicEObjectImpl.
>>>> Some background: I am only using DynamicEObjectImpl's and I am
>>>> converting a structure of non-eobjects to DynamicEObjectImpl. This
>>>> conversion is easier if there are no bidirectional things happening,
>>>> i.e. the conversion takes care of setting both sides of a
>>>> bidirectional association.
>>>>
>>>> Would DynamicEObjectImpl.dynamicSet be a good choice in this case?
>>> No.
>>>> As all the feature's are dynamic I guess that
>>>> eClass.getFeatureId(feature) will give the dynamicfeatureid?
>>> How come you didn't like my eInverseAdd/eInverseRemove answer? I'm
>>> going to stick with that for now. :-P Whatever the answer, it needs
>>> to be in an interface implemented by all modeled objects...
>>>>
>>>> gr. Martin
>>>>
>>>> Ed Merks wrote:
>>>>> Martin,
>>>>>
>>>>> InternalEObject.eInverseAdd/eInverseRemove do the 1/2 updates on
>>>>> the one side. See how the generated eInverseAdd/eInverseRemove
>>>>> call basicSetAuthor?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Martin Taal wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Ed,
>>>>>> Does DynamicEObjectImpl have something like a basicSet method
>>>>>> which does not update the inverse of an association?
>>>>>> (for example in the Library example, the BookImpl.basicSetAuthor
>>>>>> method)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
--
With Regards, Martin Taal
Springsite/Elver.org
Office: Hardwareweg 4, 3821 BV Amersfoort
Postal: Nassaulaan 7, 3941 EC Doorn
The Netherlands
Cell: +31 (0)6 288 48 943
Tel: +31 (0)84 420 2397
Fax: +31 (0)84 225 9307
Mail: mtaal@springsite.com - mtaal@elver.org
Web: www.springsite.com - www.elver.org
|
|
|
| Re: DynamicEObjectImpl.basicSet? [message #428082 is a reply to message #428080] |
Mon, 09 March 2009 18:14 |
Ed Merks
Messages: 33218
Registered: July 2009 |
Senior Member |
|
|
Martin,
Sorry.
The baseClass can just be null if the featureID (so yes, use the feature
ID computed by the actual EClass) doesn't need offset correction.
Martin Taal wrote:
> Hmm, I try to match your answer with my question but I do not see a
> relation... :-)
>
> Which other parameter do you mean?
>
> gr. Martin
>
> Ed Merks wrote:
>> Martin,
>>
>> If you use the one specific to the actual class, then you can pass in
>> null for the other parameter.
>>
>>
>> Martin Taal wrote:
>>> Hi Ed,
>>> Ha okay (finally listening to you I think :-), inverseAdd is
>>> basically the same as basicSet for a single ereference,
>>> one final question the featureid for this call should be obtained
>>> like this:
>>> eClass.getFeatureId(feature)
>>>
>>> correct?
>>>
>>> or is it feature.getFeatureId() in this case?
>>>
>>> gr. Martin
>>>
>>> Ed Merks wrote:
>>>> Martin,
>>>>
>>>> Comments below.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Martin Taal wrote:
>>>>> Hi Ed,
>>>>> Yes I see the basicSetAuthor, but which method on
>>>>> DynamicEObjectImpl would correspond to it?
>>>> You should never assume any specific Impl will be used, though we
>>>> do expect any impl to extend BasicEObjectImpl.
>>>>> Some background: I am only using DynamicEObjectImpl's and I am
>>>>> converting a structure of non-eobjects to DynamicEObjectImpl. This
>>>>> conversion is easier if there are no bidirectional things
>>>>> happening, i.e. the conversion takes care of setting both sides of
>>>>> a bidirectional association.
>>>>>
>>>>> Would DynamicEObjectImpl.dynamicSet be a good choice in this case?
>>>> No.
>>>>> As all the feature's are dynamic I guess that
>>>>> eClass.getFeatureId(feature) will give the dynamicfeatureid?
>>>> How come you didn't like my eInverseAdd/eInverseRemove answer? I'm
>>>> going to stick with that for now. :-P Whatever the answer, it
>>>> needs to be in an interface implemented by all modeled objects...
>>>>>
>>>>> gr. Martin
>>>>>
>>>>> Ed Merks wrote:
>>>>>> Martin,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> InternalEObject.eInverseAdd/eInverseRemove do the 1/2 updates on
>>>>>> the one side. See how the generated eInverseAdd/eInverseRemove
>>>>>> call basicSetAuthor?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Martin Taal wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Ed,
>>>>>>> Does DynamicEObjectImpl have something like a basicSet method
>>>>>>> which does not update the inverse of an association?
>>>>>>> (for example in the Library example, the BookImpl.basicSetAuthor
>>>>>>> method)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
Ed Merks
Professional Support: https://www.macromodeling.com/
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Sep 26 07:59:36 GMT 2024
Powered by FUDForum. Page generated in 0.05588 seconds |
] 
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
